BryceHoro posted at 5:01 AM Sun, 19 March 2023 - #4459029

I do not argue with your insights, gabrierikdesign and I fully agree that Daz 3D is completely ignorant of Bryce, it does not even accept new assets (my second last was declined within 35 seconds (!) and the last one I tried took less than 2 minutes to be declined). Interestingly enough, I have 59 sets for Bryce in the Daz store and they still sell enough for Daz 3D to keep me as a PA.

Nevertheless, I still run Bryce 4, 5, 5.5, 6.0, 6.1, 6.3, 7.0 and 7.1 on a Windows 2000, an XP, 2 Win 7 and 2 Win 10 and even use Network Rendering (though not very often).

Bryce has its limitations, no doubt, but it is versatile. You can do abstracts, landscapes, space scenes or under water scenes, objects, vegetation, ... I find it difficult to use it successfully for characters, particularly close-up faces. Renders can take long, even on my i9 16 core CPU Win 10. Raytracing always takes more time than pathtracing because it makes less shortcuts.

The memory limitation of 2 GB (or about 3.5 GB with LAA) is a severe limitation. Compressing a final scene to save on disk is probably the worst "advantage" that was introduced with Bryce 6 because it is done in memory and thus limits it even more.

I can not comment on animation. I had tried it a long time ago and realised that I am a complete nut doing movies.

The last update to Bryce was made in 2011, and this is - as far as computer programs are concerned - an eternity. Looking on the bright side: no new bugs were introduced and meanwhile I know a lot of them and found ways around them.

So for me, Bryce is not dead.

Maybe I use Bryce in the wrong way. I love this program, very intuitive, friendly interface, and without limits for imagination... but, for example, I finished an image in three months, dedicating an average of 8-10 hours of rendering daily in that period. I used an ASUS GL753VD laptop, with an Intel i7 7700HQ CPU and 8gb of RAM (now 16Ggb). Yes, I made the image at a resolution of 4000x2250 pixels with antialiasing options, but reducing the rays per pixel to 9. And yes, it turned out very nice, but the time invested seemed excessive to me.

Here I leave this image at low resolution, but you can appreciate the amount of work it took me:

Bryce allows me to do things like this image, what kills me is the excessive render time and the 3.5gb ceiling of the program. If only DAZ would devote some attention to this program...

Thanks for your reply. It encourages me a little bit to not leave Bryce aside.

Greetings to all!! My name is Gabriel, and I apologize if I combine first message I write here.

I found this thread through a Google search, and I just want to comment that I started with Bryce 2 for PC, then I moved to 5 and finally I bought Bryce 7.1 PRO, which I use on two PCs. one with Windows 7 and the other, an Asus laptop with Windows 10.

For me, Bryce has hit the ceiling as it is. It is unstable on Windows 7 and 10. I use it with L.A.A. but their limit on RAM is absurd. Its rendering slowness is excessive, and that I only limit myself to making static images. It doesn't even cross my mind to make short animations.

I worked for an artist in New York, as a 3D designer, to create 3D images that reflected his style and his art, and in that time period I got to know a lot of things about Bryce, but also his limitations. Even he himself told me that, talking to other artists, when he commented that I was working for him with Bryce, they told him "what is wrong with you?"

The result: a few months ago I stopped working for him, because I no longer provide him with what he wants, because of the program. Now I still use Bryce for my ideas as an artist, but already without much illusion, knowing that I use a program that is out of the labor market in 2023. I have installed Blender 3.4, and I will start learning other software again, since DAZ is not interested in keeping Bryce alive in the least.

It's very sad for me to say it, but Bryce is dead. At least that's the feeling I have.
Greetings to all.