tjohn opened this issue on Jan 19, 2003 ยท 8 posts
tjohn posted Sun, 19 January 2003 at 8:35 AM
This is not my "second childhood". I'm not finished with the first one yet.
Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana.
"I'd like to die peacefully in my sleep like my grandfather....not screaming in terror like the passengers on his bus." - Jack Handy
airflamesred posted Sun, 19 January 2003 at 9:55 AM
the outline seems to be too sharp for my liking and the bryce starfield never looks right - nature of the beast.I found a way with an upended terrain and some wierd tex I d/L from somewhere (challenge entry).It's a classic pose though not to be barked at!.
Colette1 posted Sun, 19 January 2003 at 10:55 AM
Looks pretty good for using only the Bryce Starfield/moon. Mine have yet to come out that well. :)
Quest posted Sun, 19 January 2003 at 12:27 PM
Attached Link: http://www.renderosity.com/viewed.ez?galleryid=305568&Start=1&Artist=Quest&ByArtist=Yes
Tjohn, LOL...hmmmmmmm, yes, I see what you mean about being a clichimage. Anyway, I found that I had to subdue the lighting in such a way that the textures in the foreground were barely visible. The ferns just barely have color, the closest tree texture grain is barely discernable and the wolf's fur can hardly be made out. Because of the moonbeams and apparent brightness of the full moon, the glare from the fog wiped out all traces of the lunar features. You could post-work it so that the moon retains its surface features. I think that the stars are too pin pointed and IMHO need some stellar aberrations to give them that twinkling appearance. Overall, I know what you mean by it being a compelling image .tjohn posted Sun, 19 January 2003 at 12:52 PM
Quest: Your image is very, very, good, great render and composition. But that's a VERY bright moon. Are you sure that isn't the Bryce sun? :^) The moon in my pic was as bright as I could get it inside of Bryce 5. Check item 1 under my original post. I was trying my best to use native Bryce without postwork on the sky, to see how good that I could get that to work. I agree with everything you say, I was testing my skill with Bryce 5. Normally I would just create a starfield with the Universe plug-in in Photoshop Elements, and slap a moon texture on a sphere in Bryce. But that would have been cheating under the rules I wrote myself to follow (I was trying to challenge myself. Nothing wrong with postwork, but I felt I wasn't learning the true limits of the program itself.) Thanks to all for your comments! Tjohn
This is not my "second childhood". I'm not finished with the first one yet.
Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana.
"I'd like to die peacefully in my sleep like my grandfather....not screaming in terror like the passengers on his bus." - Jack Handy
Quest posted Sun, 19 January 2003 at 1:42 PM
Well, yes, that's my point that, like you, in my attempt to bring the brightness of a moonlit night scene, all my lunar features were washed out. And yes, I could have post-worked it so that the moon would show the features but, also like you, I decided to leave it as is, maybe in some future rework. LOL...and yes, the sky lab did show it to be the Bryce moon. I'm in agreement that it's difficult and challenging jugling a nightscene with its shadows and nocturnal glow. I find that Bryce, as great a program as it is, is sometimes limited and would not allow for the finer adjustments that sometimes have to be done outside the package using other software.
Zhann posted Mon, 20 January 2003 at 12:20 AM
tjohn, maybe if the moon is more,hmmm,towards the yellow end might help...as for the lighting I have some photos of things in moonlight and the fur on the back of your wolf would be lit but anything facing away from the direct light will be in shadow, as moonlight in essence is reflected light after all (after standing out in sub zero weather, in full moonlight, to photograph an elk herd, my eyes never adjusted to the degree where you can make out that kind of detail on an animal)...but with Bryce you did an excellent job...
Bryce Forum Coordinator....
Vision is the Art of seeing things invisible...
tjohn posted Mon, 20 January 2003 at 5:59 AM
Under the right conditions, there can be more diffuse light (a slight cloudiness for example), but for most conditions you are correct. Bryce is thankfully, more versatile than a camera. As with painting, the artist can create images with impossible lighting in order to highlight those things he/she wishes to (like the fur texture of a wolf, fur instance :^) ) A yellow moon would warm the pic too much for me. I wanted it to feel cold, a bit lonesome (thus the blue fog/clouds), I wanted the viewer to "hear" the wolf howl. A limited success, but I do like the results.
This is not my "second childhood". I'm not finished with the first one yet.
Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana.
"I'd like to die peacefully in my sleep like my grandfather....not screaming in terror like the passengers on his bus." - Jack Handy