Anthony Appleyard opened this issue on Feb 01, 2003 ยท 9 posts
Anthony Appleyard posted Sat, 01 February 2003 at 10:03 AM
Attached Link: http://www.renderosity.com/messages.ez?Form.ShowMessage=1077765
Astride posted Sat, 01 February 2003 at 10:36 AM
I think there can be no models, including rubber ducks who can't be used for "inapropriate" purpose. I don't get sick seeing a foetus which is a very joyful thing, and a lot of models who have been purposely built for sick purposes are uploaded and downloaded every day. Maybe it will be useful for some medical pic, as DAZ muscle maps ? Nobody ever protested against them. So, if I were in your place, I would upload it. Pierre
pdxjims posted Sat, 01 February 2003 at 11:39 AM
All models get used for inappropriate uses (whatever that is). Someone will always object to something. Someone will consider this sick. Someone will be bothered by bad memories when seeing this. This said, the same holds true for everything loaded here. I think it's more likely to be used as an alien than an actual fetus, just because when you stretch it out it does look a lot like the aliens in Close Encounters (and a little like ET). I'm sure someone will morph him to make him closer to the movie aliens, or have him jumping out of Ragbash's belly.
geoegress posted Sat, 01 February 2003 at 1:01 PM
Yup- load it Can't please all the people all the time.- Don't even try!
Anthony Appleyard posted Sat, 01 February 2003 at 1:23 PM
Astride wrote: "including rubber ducks". There are two things called rubber ducks:- (1) A rubber model of the well-known flat-beaked bird that dredges for its food in shallow water. (2) Euphemistic for "rubber dick", and that is why a type of flexible short CB radio aerial is called a rubber duck.
Astride posted Sun, 02 February 2003 at 2:23 AM
Anthony, I didn't even know all this things. Excuse my English ! Shame on you ! :) Pierre
Anthony Appleyard posted Sun, 02 February 2003 at 4:14 AM
Sorry.
ronstuff posted Sun, 02 February 2003 at 4:12 PM
Anthony, I think this model would be a valuable asset to the community. Like many things, it can be viewed from any number of perspectives. I see it as a symbol for life itself, and as such must be considered to be beautiful. I for one recall the final scene of the film 2001 and think of that beautiful image when I see a fetus model, and to have a poseable one would be a good thing even if some people feel otherwise.
kromekat posted Mon, 03 February 2003 at 7:03 PM
Anthony! - I see no harm in it whatsoever - I was amazed at the fuss a few individuals made over my cover image, but was aware that some of the upset was more sour grapes than offence, but 'there's nowt as quear as folk'!' as the saying goes! ;) - btw, I didn't 'complain' that there wasn't a posable Foetus model, I was implying it would be useful for some applications! ;)
Adam Benton | www.kromekat.com