EricofSD opened this issue on Feb 21, 2003 ยท 7 posts
EricofSD posted Fri, 21 February 2003 at 1:14 AM
File size was set to 100k for the dialup users. I've noticed that images which are 800x600 tend to degrade a lot below 100k. If we went to 120k, that fixes a lot of concern in this area. So what do the dialup members think about this? Is 120k too much? Should we allow larger? Was 100k too much? Should we go to 640x480 and 100k to avoid the degredation? I'm inclined to go with 800x600 max and 120k max, but would love to hear from the phone modem folks.
pokeydots posted Fri, 21 February 2003 at 1:20 AM
I'm on dial up and I have no problem with 800X600 or 120K file size :)
Poser 9 SR3 and 8 sr3
=================
Processor Type: AMD Phenom II 830 Quad-Core
2.80GHz, 4000MHz System Bus, 2MB L2 Cache + 6MB Shared L3 Cache
Hard Drive Size: 1TB
Processor - Clock Speed: 2.8 GHz
Operating System: Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit
Graphics Type: ATI Radeon HD 4200
•ATI Radeon HD 4200 integrated graphics
System Ram: 8GB
EricofSD posted Fri, 21 February 2003 at 1:35 AM
Would 150k be ok? I have a 100 Mbps dsl so I can't tell. How large a size is bothersome?
Tashar59 posted Fri, 21 February 2003 at 2:32 AM
Is this about how long it takes to see all the images? I would go 800x600 at 150k or the same as posting here which is 200k I think. I'm on a slow dailup, but I hate pixilated renders even more.
eirian posted Fri, 21 February 2003 at 7:37 AM
Well, I use a cable modem but the speed is capped at 64k (don't ask!). Slightly better than dial up, but not by much. 150K doesn't take too long to d/l...I also prefer the slow download over poor image quality.
geoegress posted Fri, 21 February 2003 at 9:24 AM
I probably have the worst dial up speed on 'osity- and I don't have any problem with gallery images that are under the 500 k limit. Often too much detail is lost at 800600, I perfer 1024768 myself, but what do I know :) lol- 2.6 kb/sec is a good connection for me :( god I hate being out in the sticks Geo
RHaseltine posted Fri, 21 February 2003 at 1:11 PM
I find that if a thread has more than fifteen or so biggish images the download times out for the later ones, so I should think 150K would be fine.