I hop you don't think me petty but I was concerned by a particular pair of free items posted a few days ago. I won't name names. These items were tectures for another popular freebie. Whe I downloaded them I discovered they were the jpg tectures from the original freebie which had been tinted to different hues in a graphics pack. Each jpg still had the original creators copyright clearly on it. I know we are talking free here not purchased but surely this is a little cheeky from a moral point of view. The original creator did the work on this texture, which we could tint for our own purposes if we wanted I suppose. However the publisher of the 'new' freebies is kinda claiming credit for something he/she has not really done. What do you guys think? I am being silly or is this simply not cricket?