begga opened this issue on May 16, 2003 ยท 7 posts
begga posted Fri, 16 May 2003 at 6:56 PM
begga posted Fri, 16 May 2003 at 6:57 PM
Axe_Gaijin posted Fri, 16 May 2003 at 7:53 PM
Not sure if I understand this but you want to make a Stonhendge scene with stonehendge as it was in it's glory days? In that case... you got it right there. Stonehendge as it is now, is in a much further state of colapse then pictured on that model. In fact the outer rings aren't upright anymore. Keep in mind Stonehendge (and many sites like it) have evolved over several hundereths of years, starting out from a simple circle of dirt (ditch). http://www.dreamandtravel.com/london/2.html http://www.dreamandtravel.com/london/3.html
begga posted Fri, 16 May 2003 at 8:06 PM
yeah u got it right.. thanks
Don posted Fri, 16 May 2003 at 10:58 PM
There is a Sonehenge 3D replica in Wahington (state) on the north shore of the mighty Columbia River. I don't recall the town or county. East of Portland. It is a scale model built outa concrete by some rich guy to honor the dead soldiers in WW One from Washington. Really cool! You can walk around in it for free and thus get an idea of the scale and some magnitude. Past just getting there, the original on the Salisbury Plain is not always accesible I hear and is in quite a state of decay. For those of you all in the USA, the one in Wash. is a reasonable alternative. Read the novel SARUM by Edward Rutherford. There is a lengthy section about the building of Stonehenge from a young mason's POV.
hauksdottir posted Sat, 17 May 2003 at 2:53 AM
Attached Link: http://www.roadsideamerica.com/set/OVERhenges.html
America has more than one Stonehenge alternative! We also have "Carhenge" and one at a university back east which keeps accurate time. www.roadsideamerica.com reviews places like this from the perspective of a weary traveler looking for a bit of amusement or inspiration. They also give travel directions and hints as to local food and manners. Back to the original queries... a fairly accurate model "as built" would be great. There were 2 types of stone used, so you'd need at least 2 textures. The 56 "aubrey holes" (usable to determine eclipses) shouldn't be filled in with anything but chalk. The heel stone ought to be a separate prop with instructions for placement in case people use their own landscapes... or you can build the land with moat and processional way all neat and tidy. You are also working with a couple of the archeoastrological books? They have nice top-down maps. CarollyHaiGan posted Sat, 17 May 2003 at 3:15 AM
If anyone actually wants photos of the original Stonehenge in its current state, I can pop down the road and take some, I live pretty close. It's not possible to get right up to the stones- they've got barriers up to keep people back in an attempt to stop them degenerating so fast- but if you know which road to sit on with a telephoto lens it's still possible to capture it from most angles. I can also do you a general 'in situ' shot so you can see how it fits into the surrounding landscape. There are several outlying mounds associated with the site that aren't usually included in photos. If you want a truly impressive stone circle, however, don't pick Stonehenge, pick Avebury. That place is so big there's a village in the middle of it!