If I am not mistaken, a couple of years ago or last year, wasn't there a ruling by the supreme court regarding child pronography? And I am paraphrasing....something like "...it is not considered pornography because CGI is not real...", something like that right? If I am correct in my assumption this line in the EULA for AMG... "Likewise, any pornographic or otherwise degrading and/or demeaning material created using this product, along with her name, cannot be distributed without her written permission as well" This can't really matter, there is no pornography according to the supreme court cause it isn't real if it is CGI....right? Hope I asked this correctly....Sharen PS: this does not really pertain to AMG, it is a question I have been wondering for a while, I think of it because I read the EULA of AMG that is all, please don't read anything into this question.