When you write copy, you have the right to copyright the copy you write, if the copy is right. If however, your copy falls over, you must right your copy. If you write religious services you write rite, and have the right to copyright the rite you write. Very conservative people write right copy, and have the right to copyright the right copy they write. A right wing cleric would write right rite, and has the right to copyright the right rite he has the right to write. His editor has the job of making the right rite copy right before the copyright can be right. Should Thom Wright decide to write right rite, then Wright would write right rite, which Wright has the right to copyright. Duplicating that rite would copy Wright's right rite, and violate copyright, which Wright would have the right to right. Right?

groan Can I quote this in the Mod area?

Quote on. :)

P.S. credit goes to that great author Anonymous.

P.s.s. Unless someone recognizes it and can put a name to it, that is.

and that's all she wrote..;)

I wish I'd said that.. The Staircase Wit

anahl nathrak uth vas betude doth yel dyenvey..;)

But is it right to copy a copied piece in the copyright forum if you aren't sure who the copyrighted piece has been copied from?

But what about that copy of a left leaflet I left in the lift?

Leaving lifted leaflets lets lefties lead lingering lives.

loose listserves sink servers..;)

I wish I'd said that.. The Staircase Wit

anahl nathrak uth vas betude doth yel dyenvey..;)