Why is it that the hardest thing for me to do with Bryce is the very thing that it was created to do, mimic the natural world with landscapes? Most of the best nature images produced seem to be a combination of Bryce and a lot of postwork in a paint program (Hobbit's work is a good example of what I mean - it's unbeatable but it looks postworked to me), Dryfly is the only Bryce artist I'm aware of who doesn't appear to postwork his nature images - how does he do that? I'm not adverse to postwork to improve an image, but some are. So the subject title is a question I'd like to put to the members: Nature Images are Hard! Why?!!

This is not my "second childhood". I'm not finished with the first one yet.

Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana.

"I'd like to die peacefully in my sleep like my grandfather....not screaming in terror like the passengers on his bus." - Jack Handy