DarkElegance opened this issue on Sep 14, 2003 ยท 10 posts
DarkElegance posted Sun, 14 September 2003 at 11:08 AM
I was looking through progs gallery{go look specially if you like red heads} and noticed he has some wonderful breasts. very nice and natural looking. so I asked him..How? he noted the narrow sternum dial ..but that is for V3 yes I have v3 but do not use her as well waiting a half hour for her to render is just ...gah. anyway is there such a morph {custom or what ever} that does the same in V2?
https://www.darkelegance.co.uk/
randym77 posted Sun, 14 September 2003 at 2:16 PM
Attached Link: voluptuous vicky
Nice, maybe, but "natural" isn't quite the word I'd use. :-)It looks like he's using Daz' Sarah Spriteling morph set for at least some of his images. There are morph packs for Vicky 1 & 2 that do similar things. Check out Voluptuous Vicki and/or Supermodel Vicki in the MP.
DarkElegance posted Sun, 14 September 2003 at 3:11 PM
I dont need all that..juuuuuust to tweek out the sternum so it doesnt look like her breast are a mile apart
https://www.darkelegance.co.uk/
Jaager posted Sun, 14 September 2003 at 3:24 PM
V2 comes with BrstCleavage and BrstRotateIn - there are a couple on my site I named br-hrse-shoe that affect upper part of the gap.
DarkElegance posted Sun, 14 September 2003 at 5:28 PM
yes I have tried those too and it makes them looked smooshed..it was nice for when her arms were together or such .I need to correct that ...mile wide sternum. I tried that taper deal but that just ACK.
https://www.darkelegance.co.uk/
DarkElegance posted Sun, 14 September 2003 at 5:28 PM
yes I have tried those too and it makes them looked smooshed..it was nice for when her arms were together or such .I need to correct that ...mile wide sternum. I tried that taper deal but that just ACK.
https://www.darkelegance.co.uk/
DarkElegance posted Sun, 14 September 2003 at 5:28 PM
yes I have tried those too and it makes them looked smooshed..it was nice for when her arms were together or such .I need to correct that ...mile wide sternum. I tried that taper deal but that just ACK.
https://www.darkelegance.co.uk/
hauksdottir posted Mon, 15 September 2003 at 7:26 AM
Natural breasts ARE spaced out. There is a flat area on the sternum. If a woman has silicone implants, they can float anywhere, and a sure way to tell falsies used to be by the fact that "you can't slide a credit card between them" to quote from a British mystery. Carolly
lucstef posted Mon, 15 September 2003 at 6:55 PM
Well, uhm, Hauksdottir...I hace to disagree with you :-)
At least, natural breasts aren't THAT spaced in the upper area as V2/V3 shows, they looks like a plastic surgeon mistake in placing her sylicon implants.
Even assuming they're correctly spaced, I have to complain with the too rough internal edges ("flat area on the sternum" as you said...well, it isn't THAT flat) and with the attaching upper point shifted too much toward the shoulders.
I think I'm having some bad days with Vicky, her/its flaws are driving me nuts in trying to correct them...or is it me???
DarkElegance posted Mon, 15 September 2003 at 10:01 PM
~looks down ther her own and knows they are not silicone~ erm...mine are not a mile apart. I just want to tweek it abit as they look like they are near under her arms. and actually falsies are usually now put under the chest wall so not only do the break sit more naturally but that the implants do not move..how did this morph to a falsy convo... anyway....great now I will be looking through all my glamours and cosmos looking at the models and judgeing sternums
https://www.darkelegance.co.uk/