Solo22 opened this issue on Sep 07, 2000 ยท 12 posts
Solo22 posted Thu, 07 September 2000 at 4:20 PM
pa902 posted Thu, 07 September 2000 at 4:58 PM
There seems to be enough distance fade without the blur. I like it better not blurred
ClintH posted Thu, 07 September 2000 at 5:19 PM
WOW! Excellent! I like the blurred image better - the one on the right. Clint
Clint Hawkins
MarketPlace Manager/Copyright Agent
All my life I've been over the top ... I don't know what I'm doing
... All I know is I don't wana stop!
(Zakk Wylde (2007))
Curfew posted Thu, 07 September 2000 at 5:57 PM
the one on the right looks more natural
shadownet posted Thu, 07 September 2000 at 6:13 PM
The one on the right is right. :o)
ColtCentaur posted Thu, 07 September 2000 at 6:15 PM
Tone down the blurr just a bit :) =Colt
Ghostofmacbeth posted Thu, 07 September 2000 at 7:47 PM
Right ...Though it possibly could be toned down just a bit ...
Mason posted Thu, 07 September 2000 at 8:12 PM
I think there should be more bikini girls in the background, you know, to give it a frame of reference. I like the blurred better but maybe only 50% of what it is now. Also, you could try a little more value degration. The light beach kind of pops forward.
pa902 posted Thu, 07 September 2000 at 8:32 PM
Hey how did you do that hair?
Solo22 posted Thu, 07 September 2000 at 8:35 PM
The hair is real hair filtered over in post. about at 50%
Solo22 posted Thu, 07 September 2000 at 8:38 PM
I posted the large version in the gallery. But I is probably to blured...I will try to tone it down sometime tonight. you can go see the larger version at: http://www.renderosity.com/viewed.ez?galleryid=19092
Kageboshi posted Fri, 08 September 2000 at 2:08 AM
Blurring looks fine to me, as does the rest of the picture. But, wouldn't that hurt her breasts?