Michelle A. opened this issue on Mar 27, 2004 ยท 18 posts
Michelle A. posted Sat, 27 March 2004 at 11:48 PM
I am, therefore I create.......
--- michelleamarante.com
dampeoples posted Sun, 28 March 2004 at 12:32 AM
I recently picked up one of the Holga's, but no shop around here processes 120. I'm moving in a few weeks, so I can get started then. It'll be interesting to see your creations before I get around to starting mine.
DHolman posted Sun, 28 March 2004 at 5:32 AM
I've got a Holga sitting on my shelf. I am actually going to convert it to a pinhole camera when I get some free time. Already built a weighted bracket that attaches to the bottom and will allow me to mount it on a tripod. The shims I'm looking at will give me an f-stop of either f/126 or f/158. -=>Donald
firestorm posted Sun, 28 March 2004 at 6:51 AM
oohh..cool. cant wait for the new pics. i got an old italian camera that uses 120 film. i've shot half a roll, may go back to it soon. was thinking of turning it into a pinhole as well. it doesn't have much control and anyway, it was cheap on ebay.
Pictures appear to me, I shoot them. Elliot Erwitt
DrmzRmyne posted Sun, 28 March 2004 at 8:01 AM
Well I'm an idiot on this one...never heard of it...must be ancient. lol. I do look forward to seeing what you create with your mind and eye....congrats!
Syncopate posted Sun, 28 March 2004 at 10:43 AM
Not long ago I purchased a Polaroid Land Camera 215 on eBay. I believe it was manufactured around 1968 (?) or therabouts. Yes, I've been trying it out, and playing around with it. It takes surprisingly good shot. My digital is still my favorite camera, though. :c)
Michelle A. posted Sun, 28 March 2004 at 10:46 AM
Where did you get batteries for it Syncopate? I have two that I bought from ebay a 420 and a 450.... and I'd like to be able to use them.
I am, therefore I create.......
--- michelleamarante.com
AntoniaTiger posted Sun, 28 March 2004 at 12:26 PM
I remember the Polaroid cameras from that era, and I don't think they used batteries. The flash used a bulb, and I don't recall and exposure meter, just match the weather-symbol. And then you pulled the film out between two rollers that broke the chemical packets and spread them out, and waited. Messy but magical.
Michelle A. posted Sun, 28 March 2004 at 1:40 PM
I am, therefore I create.......
--- michelleamarante.com
Michelle A. posted Sun, 28 March 2004 at 1:41 PM
I am, therefore I create.......
--- michelleamarante.com
AntoniaTiger posted Sun, 28 March 2004 at 2:02 PM
Which, alas, shows why so many cameras will be useless now. I've been shooting with a Russian Fed-2 recently, and not a battery in sight. The real trouble are the cameras which used a mercury cell -- there are workarounds but you cannot get the original-spec battery. For 120 I have a Russian Lubitel somewhere, a very basic TLR, but there is a local lab which can handle the film.
DHolman posted Sun, 28 March 2004 at 6:35 PM
Attached Link: http://www.photobattery.com/index.html
@Michelle - Ahh ... the old Polaroids. That battery is a 532 (think it was also called a PX24). Go to the above link and do a CTRL-F (Find on this page) for 532. Don't use their SEARCH option on the page as it will just take you back to the same page without pinpointing where it is on the page. I use these guys when I'm trying to find batteries and stuff for my old cameras (and for computers and other batteries, I use www.batteries.com). -=>DonaldMichelle A. posted Sun, 28 March 2004 at 7:02 PM
Ooooo Donald I owe you extra smootchies for this one! Yes they have them! Thank you, thank you, thank you. :~*
I am, therefore I create.......
--- michelleamarante.com
Tedz posted Sun, 28 March 2004 at 10:01 PM
All this talk of Batteries is getting Me excited :]
AntoniaTiger posted Wed, 31 March 2004 at 9:57 AM
Tedz posted Wed, 31 March 2004 at 10:59 AM
How can You be sooooooo cruel....I like getting excited...sigh....how old are You ....to have such antique equipment.....a wee Hugz for thinking of Me...sigh
Michelle A. posted Wed, 31 March 2004 at 11:14 AM
Looks like a sweet camera you have there....! :~) Love the leather case.... and no batteries.... ahhh those were the days!
I am, therefore I create.......
--- michelleamarante.com
AntoniaTiger posted Tue, 11 May 2004 at 2:50 PM
Just to revive things... The camera is a Russian Fed-2, one of the earlier variants, manufactured about 1957, the the 50/f3.5 collapsible lens, while the meter is a Weston Master III of broadly similar age. The Fed-2 is sometimes described as a Leica copy, but is arguably a better design than the screw-mount Leica cameras of the same period. The Russians did copy the Leica, and the Kiev was a post-war copy of the Contax. In the fifties, they started improving things. The screw thread Leica design is a bastard to load film. You need to cut a longer leader, and it's a slow job, since only the baseplate of the camera opens and you have to thread the film in. It also has the rangefinder and the viewfinder with seperate eyepieces. The Fed-2 has a Contax-style combined rangefinder/viewfinder, and the base/back of the camera remove to load film; still a bit slow, but much easier than the Leica design. Anyhow, this morning a parcel arrived from Russia, and I have a different lens I can use, coming from the Contax/Zeiss line of development which the Russians cheerfully moveed over to the Fed and Zorki Leica-style cameras. A Jupiter-3, which is a 50mm/f1.5, and I am itching to get some prints shot and processed. OK, so the extra aperture isn't going to make any difference to the viewfinder image. This isn't an SLR. And the coupling between lens and rangefinder is rather important at f1.5 -- will things be in focus or not? But the extra aperture makes a big difference to the usable range of light levels, for shooting hand-held indoors without flash. Now, should I get a wide-angle or a telephoto next?