cynlee opened this issue on May 04, 2004 ยท 13 posts
cynlee posted Tue, 04 May 2004 at 11:57 AM
cynlee posted Tue, 04 May 2004 at 11:57 AM
Nilla posted Tue, 04 May 2004 at 12:03 PM
Gorgeous butterfly! And you should be pleased with this, it is awesome! :)
cynlee posted Tue, 04 May 2004 at 12:07 PM
thanks... i never quit shooting but i get stalled posting & appreciate the push :]
Michelle A. posted Tue, 04 May 2004 at 12:11 PM
Cindy... this is beautiful... will be looking forward to see what you do with it.... I'm amazed at the quality of your butterfly shots.... Like an old pro! :~)
I am, therefore I create.......
--- michelleamarante.com
cynlee posted Tue, 04 May 2004 at 12:16 PM
dances around i have more! :] hey... funny how this feedback works... now my engine is really purring! hope i can keep it going before it stalls again...
Lalani posted Tue, 04 May 2004 at 3:40 PM
:O Gorgeous shot, girlie! huggles
WiserAngel posted Tue, 04 May 2004 at 6:16 PM
magnificent, cynlee!!!!!!!!!!!
logiloglu posted Tue, 04 May 2004 at 7:21 PM
a fantastic entry, Cyn. !!!!!!!! #:O) !!!!!!!!!!
Tedz posted Tue, 04 May 2004 at 8:41 PM
Great Polka Dot Outfit....Dance some more :]
cynlee posted Wed, 05 May 2004 at 1:25 PM
Attached Link: http://www.renderosity.com/viewed.ez?galleryid=664154
postworked image now up in the gallery :] thank you
Misha883 posted Wed, 05 May 2004 at 7:53 PM
Very nice how a few carefully applied workflow steps make such a big difference!
jcv2 posted Fri, 14 May 2004 at 5:21 AM
Fantastic to see the original and the postprocessed version! I love the realistic approach but that doesn't mean that postwork would not be necessary. Our human eye perceives unlike the photocamera far more colors and on a computer we have to process the gamma before it comes near to our original perception. Scanning slides requires postwork, cropping, rotating, adjusting levels, but that should do it. Oh yes, brushing away the dust! A digital camera requires only to adjust levels a bit and I guess it is not realistic to expect that this would not be necessary. Look e.g. to the difference in you other Cactus shots. The detailed one has a brightness that is quite different from the one with the swimming pool in the front. When you're looking at it with your own eyes you do not perceive this in this way. But the camera does! It corrects automatically, and there's the problem, because it differs a little from our pupil reflex! My conclusion is that not allowing any postwork is trying too much to adapt our perception to that of the apparatus thus adoring the technology in this camera in stead of focusing on the impression of the photographer. ~ Jan-Carel ~