MoonGoat opened this issue on Nov 17, 2004 ยท 12 posts
MoonGoat posted Wed, 17 November 2004 at 9:18 PM
I think it's about time for me to find out once and for all. :)
TheBryster posted Wed, 17 November 2004 at 9:44 PM Forum Moderator
Apparently it's to inform us that the thumbnail is not the entire image but only an interesting part of it......
Available on Amazon for the Kindle E-Reader
All the Woes of a World by Jonathan Icknield aka The Bryster
And in my final hours - I would cling rather to the tattooed hand of kindness - than the unblemished hand of hate...
FuzzyShadows posted Wed, 17 November 2004 at 10:55 PM
It's a marketing ploy! The curious love it.
vasquez posted Thu, 18 November 2004 at 2:10 AM
agree totally with fuzzyshadows... it is just a marketing ploy, just to get curiosity coming out from the browser.
draculaz posted Thu, 18 November 2004 at 5:20 AM
i always thought it was a copyright thing. I mean you never know, someone might take a 200x200 pixel image, stretch it to 1000x1000, and say it's his =) drac
tjohn posted Thu, 18 November 2004 at 8:41 AM
I do this quite a bit. If there's a bit of fun in the image, it is best not to reveal the gag in the thumb. Many people won't bother to view the large image if you do. Sometimes I just don't want to give away the whole idea in the thumbnail. And since there are many people who would just look at the thumb and think it was all the image had to offer, I add the word "Detail" so they know there's more to it. For some images, the thumbnail just can't do the image justice. Other times, using the whole image as the thumb just seems to be better. It just depends on the image and one's personal taste. John To bring up a related topic, does anyone look at images that have no thumbnails? Maybe I should be ashamed to admit it, but I don't believe I've ever looked at one. I think it makes me a bit leery. I've been burned by thumbnails that inadequately represented the image. Stuff that I really didn't want to see that went places I didn't really want to go, if you know what I mean.
This is not my "second childhood". I'm not finished with the first one yet.
Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana.
"I'd like to die peacefully in my sleep like my grandfather....not screaming in terror like the passengers on his bus." - Jack Handy
drawbridgep posted Thu, 18 November 2004 at 9:38 AM
I don't tend to look at thumbnailless pictures, unless there are a few comments already. And thumbnails that have nothing to do with the true image bug me also. Should be a law against it. Or maybe I'm just in a bad mood.
Swade posted Thu, 18 November 2004 at 10:05 AM
I have never really known the why behind the "DETAIL" on the thumbs either... I like your reasoning about it Tjohn. As for images with no thumbnails.... Like you Phil...I almost never look at them... unless there are a few comments.
There are 10 kinds of people: Those who know binary, and those who don't.
A whiner is about as useful as a one-legged man at an arse kicking contest.
pakled posted Thu, 18 November 2004 at 3:20 PM
I thought it meant the render had been obsessively cleaned..;) or maybe it's just a new version of 'wash me'?..;)
I wish I'd said that.. The Staircase Wit
anahl nathrak uth vas betude doth yel dyenvey..;)
TheBryster posted Thu, 18 November 2004 at 4:59 PM Forum Moderator
Sorry! No thumb-no view. Or at least it better have a very intriguing title. Full pic thumbs are often clear enough to allow me to decide if I want to view the whole thing or not.. and then I can winno-out the shinny spheres over water etc.
Available on Amazon for the Kindle E-Reader
All the Woes of a World by Jonathan Icknield aka The Bryster
And in my final hours - I would cling rather to the tattooed hand of kindness - than the unblemished hand of hate...
MoonGoat posted Thu, 18 November 2004 at 6:00 PM
Hey, I look at thumb-less ones sometimes, and I've found quite a few gems, some are even on my favorite images list I believe.
IndigoSplash posted Fri, 19 November 2004 at 12:08 AM
I use the detail method for one of two reasons...either the full image at 200x200 looks like crap from the loss of detail (sometimes the details of an image are more important to me, personally, than the overall subject). Or, I have nudity in the image but want to tone down how much is in the thumbnail because I don't necessarily want to get only nudity-driven views. As mentioned, focusing on a portion of the image without indicating it, might lead the viewer to assume there's nothing more to the image...therefore, I put "detail" on the thumbnail in case they were interested enough in the detail to see the whole version. It's not meant to be a tease on my part. Just trying to give the best representation of the work inside.