nightfir opened this issue on Mar 04, 2005 ยท 25 posts
nightfir posted Fri, 04 March 2005 at 4:45 AM
nightfir posted Fri, 04 March 2005 at 4:46 AM
nightfir posted Fri, 04 March 2005 at 4:47 AM
nightfir posted Fri, 04 March 2005 at 4:48 AM
nightfir posted Fri, 04 March 2005 at 4:49 AM
Richard T posted Fri, 04 March 2005 at 6:47 AM
Looking good.
AntoniaTiger posted Fri, 04 March 2005 at 7:23 AM
Has a bit of a toonish look to it, but nicely done. People don't realise how strong glass can be under compression. Put different motors on, and it would look good in vacuum too.
Khai posted Fri, 04 March 2005 at 8:00 AM
nice for shallow water work :) say to about 200 meters then you really do need a thick hull ;)
ratscloset posted Fri, 04 March 2005 at 10:37 AM
I would not say toonish, but 1950ish Hollywood Special Effect Prop. The type of thing so you could see the big name star sitting in it while it was supposedly underwater.
ratscloset
aka John
XENOPHONZ posted Fri, 04 March 2005 at 10:43 AM
As I indicated in the other thread: it looks good to me. Unusual.
A deep sea squid, a giant octopus, or a large shark could provide some interest for the occupants.
See you in the marketplace soon.
Little_Dragon posted Fri, 04 March 2005 at 11:47 AM
I don't see any control surfaces. How do you achieve pitch and roll without dive planes? Trim tanks?
XENOPHONZ posted Fri, 04 March 2005 at 11:57 AM
How do you achieve pitch and roll without dive planes? Trim tanks?
Through the use of anti-gravity devices. And warp drive, too.
XENOPHONZ posted Fri, 04 March 2005 at 12:04 PM
It's a fantasy vehicle.
AntoniaTiger posted Fri, 04 March 2005 at 12:46 PM
nightfir posted Fri, 04 March 2005 at 8:49 PM
nightfir posted Fri, 04 March 2005 at 9:10 PM
I like the cat. Can I take it home. Yeah it looks a little toonish i have not got all the light and reflection settings etc set right just yet. Hmm trim planes argh! Something else to add. It's allways something. I'll have to add the dive plane to the rear support spar.
revric posted Sun, 06 March 2005 at 4:00 AM
Instead of a dive plane why not put props on the top, bottom, and sides of the engine nacelles. Put them on the front and rear pointing up, down and to the side. That way you can move the sub in all three planes with out having to move foward. Just take a look at any deep submersable to see what I mean. Just a thought, since you already made a prop it would be easier to clone the prop and move it around than to make the dive plane, position it and then make a rudder or two as well. Good looking sub, by the way. Keep up the good work.
nightfir posted Sun, 06 March 2005 at 8:50 PM
nightfir posted Sun, 06 March 2005 at 8:52 PM
nightfir posted Sun, 06 March 2005 at 8:54 PM
nightfir posted Sun, 06 March 2005 at 8:55 PM
nightfir posted Sun, 06 March 2005 at 8:59 PM
nightfir posted Sun, 06 March 2005 at 9:02 PM
nightfir posted Sun, 06 March 2005 at 9:04 PM
nightfir posted Sun, 06 March 2005 at 9:07 PM