ReBorneUK opened this issue on Mar 16, 2005 ยท 27 posts
ReBorneUK posted Wed, 16 March 2005 at 4:08 PM
ReBorneUK posted Wed, 16 March 2005 at 4:12 PM
Tedz posted Wed, 16 March 2005 at 4:25 PM
Are they the Red Devils Mike? Is that a Wessex? You did well Boyo...reminding Me of Farnborough...the Stunt Shot is a Bottler!
ReBorneUK posted Wed, 16 March 2005 at 4:29 PM
Sorry Tedz, got no idea if this was the Devils or not - it was 2 years back and the sound system at the show is baaaad. I think it's a Wessex.... I'm afraid planes aren't one of my strong points!! The shots of the Red Arrows were worse again... and someone kept sticking his head up when I tried getting the Harrier... pah. (",)
Tedz posted Wed, 16 March 2005 at 4:49 PM
I "had"...Photographs of the first seen Harriers...when they Debuted at Farnborough...perhaps 1973..I worked for The British Aeronautical Society...no..not as a Pilot...as a Clerk, organizing the Invites of Military Buyers to Farnbourgh. The Harriers were hidden among the Trees, then basically popped up out of the Forest....and strafed the Runway with Incendiary Bombs...very impressive..the highlight of the Show...My Photos have been Destroyed...I gotta say that.....and not mention what dosh I got from China :]
Michelle A. posted Wed, 16 March 2005 at 5:09 PM
I am, therefore I create.......
--- michelleamarante.com
Michelle A. posted Wed, 16 March 2005 at 5:12 PM
I am, therefore I create.......
--- michelleamarante.com
ReBorneUK posted Wed, 16 March 2005 at 5:13 PM
'Chelle, the photo is very similar to my screen here, if anything it's slightly.... well, greyer/overcast. The scan does it too much justice. I haven't made alterations, no.
(",) weehee, cross-posting! Now, y'see, that's what I want it to look more like, obviously without the grain. The crux of the problem now is where can I be going wrong to not get that sort of shot OUT OF THE CAMERA. We both know I can post edit, but I want to be good without having to ;-)
Message edited on: 03/16/2005 17:19
Tedz posted Wed, 16 March 2005 at 5:18 PM
sigh...I wish She would play around with My Curve Adjustment a bit...evil grin
tibet2004uk posted Wed, 16 March 2005 at 5:23 PM
Ohla!! The first one is....interesting!! LOL! Maybe u should have post this on the "shots we never show u" thread?? O_o ;P
ReBorneUK posted Wed, 16 March 2005 at 5:30 PM
LostPatrol posted Wed, 16 March 2005 at 5:40 PM
Ok so your timing is a little off, just by a split second. So what film/ISO and camera is it shot with? P&S/SLR? Looks awful grainy so assume a fast film? Exposure looks a bit off too. The thing that bothers me most is that you said you were gonna be serious, I hope this ailment doesnt last to long Lolouder.
Sylvaine posted Wed, 16 March 2005 at 5:42 PM
ReBorneUK posted Wed, 16 March 2005 at 5:47 PM
LP, technical stuff as follows: it was 35mm..... ;-) Damn, I knew my seriousness wouldn't last. Camera : Praktica SLR, your granny would recognise the model. 300mm lens. I think it was probably 400 film. So the exposure is off? What, I expose it before it's 'Use By' date or summik?!? ta. (",)
tibet2004uk posted Wed, 16 March 2005 at 5:56 PM
LMAO!! Oh well! At least, we're having fun! ;)
LostPatrol posted Wed, 16 March 2005 at 6:06 PM
I have got an old Practica SLR from the 70's great old cam. I meant that it looked under exposed as in not enough light for the shutter speed/f stop. Incorrect light metering etc. I usually spot meter off a mid tone for film (probably not possible with an old Practica or in that scene) and set my shutter/f stop manually. A fraction of a second later and you would have got the compo. Being heavily overcast may have added to the general situation. Some 400 film can be grainy and some can be quite smooth (dont know why) Different cameras seem to affect it too. In the third pic (half Seaking helicopter)I have had shots that have had that magenta cast in the cloud, but I dont know what causes it. Maybe someone else can shed some light (excuse the pun) on it
Michelle A. posted Wed, 16 March 2005 at 6:25 PM
What kind of a metering system does a Praktica have? I'm assuming it's centered weighted? Surely does not have matrix metering... hehehe.... still in looking at the histogram it's obvious that the image is all midtone....... no highlights and no blacks..... So your exposure was off. Here's what I think happened...... your meter (in fact all camera meters) are produced to find the normal exposure... normal being 18% grey..... now normal exposure is not necessarily the correct exposure..... So your meter read the sky.... ooopps too bright, it's not 18% grey.... and it gave you a reading that corresponded to what 18% is in essence a much faster shutter speed or aperture setting than what was really needed.... hence the dull underexposed sky.... This is also why so many snow pics look grey instead of white.... Doesn't matter if you're shooting digital, film, whatever.... meter off a grey card in the light that you are shooting in.... your meter will give you the correct exposure for 18% you can then be confident that all other tones from white to black will fall into place..... If you don't have a grey card...... meter off grey concrete, grass in open shade..... anything with in that tonal range and it will give you a proper reading....
I am, therefore I create.......
--- michelleamarante.com
tibet2004uk posted Wed, 16 March 2005 at 6:39 PM
What's a grey card Michelle! And how does it work??
Michelle A. posted Wed, 16 March 2005 at 6:55 PM
What it does is help your camera meter obtain the proper exposure for 18% grey.....
Let's say you are shooting white snow..... if you metered off the snow, your snow would look grey, dull.... not white. This is because your camera meter is giving you the exposure settings that would produce 18% grey....
Pretend you are shooting a black dog..... you meter off the dog.... your dog is not going to appear black but a duller shade of grey.....
These example are far easier to see, if one is shooting BW film but it also applies to color film and digital...
To take it one step further, if you don't have a grey card and meter off the snow you should open up 1-2 stops more then what your meter says in order to obtain white.... in other words a longer shutter speed or bigger aperture opening. The meter will tell you it's going to be over-exposed but really it won't be.
Or if metering off the dog, and you want the black dog to look black, you should stop down 1-2 stops .... or a faster shutter speed or smaller aperture opening. In this case the meter will tell you you are underexposing, but you won't be.
Make any sense or totally confused now? :~)
Message edited on: 03/16/2005 18:57
I am, therefore I create.......
--- michelleamarante.com
Tedz posted Wed, 16 March 2005 at 7:13 PM
Has any Body got a spare Green Card?
Michelle A. posted Wed, 16 March 2005 at 8:05 PM
I am, therefore I create.......
--- michelleamarante.com
tibet2004uk posted Wed, 16 March 2005 at 8:26 PM
Erm...I'm afraid, confused! :( Great PS on that green card!! ;)
tvernuccio posted Wed, 16 March 2005 at 10:18 PM
so why didn't you submit that to the National Enquirer?? think about it! bet you can make some money!
Tedz posted Wed, 16 March 2005 at 10:18 PM
I don't get it much either...flutter flutter....but, I know what a Green Card is.... salute
ReBorneUK posted Thu, 17 March 2005 at 3:33 AM
Wonderful, Michelle, now I'm totally confuddlified. I'll post tonight at home, there's something I want to try which may acutally be useful as the bones for a beginners tut.... (",)
Michelle A. posted Thu, 17 March 2005 at 9:45 AM
Working on something right now, that will get the concept/idea across better! Be back in a little while!
I am, therefore I create.......
--- michelleamarante.com
cynlee posted Fri, 18 March 2005 at 2:49 AM
oh, planes! red ones too now i understand why the tut 'chelle... runnin a bit late... hehe, gotta luv the green card! :]