Bulldog opened this issue on Jan 23, 2001 ยท 6 posts
Bulldog posted Tue, 23 January 2001 at 11:09 AM
Has anyone had any problems running Poser on particular processors, (ie., pentium IIIs, Celerons, AMDs, Durons, Anthlons,etc.) or 3d graphic cards (eg. integrated - shared memory or separate cards like nVidia, ATI, etc.)? Any Windows Me problems?
bloodsong posted Tue, 23 January 2001 at 11:50 AM
heyas; i have a celeron, and no problems with poser. um, not chronic problems, anyway. i mean, i can get it to do all kinds of weird crashes, but for me, that's normal ;) i have weenies 98 and a blaster banshee agp card.
steveshanks posted Thu, 25 January 2001 at 2:44 PM
i had an amd 450mhz and rendereing took twice as long as my buddys pII celeron 350 clocked to 450 so i bought it off him :o)........Steve
lalverson posted Fri, 26 January 2001 at 3:47 PM
I'm running poser on a PIII 550 and a PII 400, memory 319MB and 128 mb, both on 100 Mhz FSB , video- Dmd 32mb ultra and a 4 mb stb. no real odd things happening OS win98 and win2K
Xena posted Mon, 29 January 2001 at 5:55 AM
I'm on a 566 celeron with integrated graphics card (up to 11Mb shared) and it sux! If I run Paint Shop Pro 6, Poser 4 and Frontpage (for doing tutorials) my system runs on about 50% resources. I'm buying a new motherboard so I can stick in my TNT2 graphics card :) Cheers, Xena
Bulldog posted Mon, 29 January 2001 at 7:54 AM
Thanks all. Sounds like I should stick with Intel with a separate graphics card and not shared graphics (I don't really like sharing anyway - never did, ever since I was two).