tvernuccio opened this issue on Jul 01, 2005 ยท 24 posts
tvernuccio posted Fri, 01 July 2005 at 11:50 AM
tvernuccio posted Fri, 01 July 2005 at 11:56 AM
tvernuccio posted Fri, 01 July 2005 at 11:58 AM
tibet2004uk posted Fri, 01 July 2005 at 12:36 PM
I defenitely prefer the original so far!! That u cut the top of her head isn't a distraction to me and I don't think u should worry about that but that's just my humble opinion! The sepia and B&W are too "white" for my taste! Lots of the details on their skin is lost there! So yea, I do prefer the original!
tibet2004uk posted Fri, 01 July 2005 at 12:47 PM
tibet2004uk posted Fri, 01 July 2005 at 12:50 PM
azy posted Fri, 01 July 2005 at 12:57 PM
Eggiwegs! I would like... to smash them!
ryno posted Fri, 01 July 2005 at 12:59 PM
I like the B&W version for the same reason Pascale dose not. It's my experience that people don't have a realistic impression of what they look like. The more you soften the image and features the better response you'll get. As for cropping the top of her head I think it's perfect compo. I see pro head shots all the time that are much tighter than this. All offered IMHO:}
TwoPynts posted Fri, 01 July 2005 at 1:01 PM
A cross between 2,3 and 8 is my best guess. I like the softness of 2, but feel some detail and contrast needs to be worked back in.
Kort Kramer - Kramer Kreations
DHolman posted Fri, 01 July 2005 at 1:07 PM
Remember ... there are no real rules in photography, just guidelines. Cutting off the head like this is very acceptable in a portrait like this. It's in close and personal ... don't sweat that.
I think the problem with the sepia and b&w one is you're coming from a fairly low contrast image to begin with (was it overcast that day?). Monochrome does not suffer flatness gladly.
Get our contrast up a bit on the original (without clipping the highlights) and it should work better for you. Message edited on: 07/01/2005 13:08
tvernuccio posted Fri, 01 July 2005 at 1:50 PM
Thanks everybody! I appreciate your input and for taking the time to comment and also play with the portrait. i have tried to keep it simple...to do a simple b/w conversion, but i really don't like it 'cause it looks so flat as Donald said. Pascale, i really don't like the orginal. just my tastes maybe. Pam doesn't like the original either. yes, Pascale, i agree with you...think my versions are too white! Jim...what you said about softening...yes...i've found that to be the case...they like it soft. Pam does. Yes, people see themselves differently. my brother, my dad...they have these say skin tones...lots of red...native American. I have it too but have more olive complexion like my mom. anyway, sometimes you can really see my red tones and i don't like it. Donald, i did try increasing the contrast and i thought maybe it was too much. i thought it brought out too much of the dark roots in Pam's hair (she dyes her hair) and kinda made Sandra's head blend into the background. that's why i didn't increase the contrast. I'd like your thoughts on this. i do like what you've done the best, Donald, because it's not flat. Will you tell me how you did it. i don't have PS. did you convert to b/w, colorize, and then increase the contrast? silly question...how do i get the contrast up without clipping the highlights? should i use curves? again, Thank you all for playing with the pic to show me what could be done and also for your feedback!!!! Glad cutting off her head wasn't a big no-no!!! i thought i really messed it up! You guys are awesome!!! :)
Damia posted Fri, 01 July 2005 at 1:57 PM
~Damia~ LeviathanPhotography
tvernuccio posted Fri, 01 July 2005 at 2:19 PM
hi Damia, Thanks for taking the time to play with my image and try to give it a different look. Pam didn't like the color version that i took. i don't think they would care for this one either since the red tones in their skin is enhanced. i think they would prefer an image where their skin tones are de-emphasized. but i sure do appreciate you taking the time to do this! thanks!!!! yeah, i think you're right that they'll appreciate my efforts. since it's my family, well ya know...i wanna be sure to do an extra special job...to do my absolute best to please them!!! :)
Onslow posted Fri, 01 July 2005 at 2:43 PM
And every one said, 'If we only live,
We too will go to sea in a Sieve,---
To the hills of the Chankly Bore!'
Far and few, far and few, Are the lands where the Jumblies
live;
Their heads are green, and their hands are blue, And they went to
sea in a Sieve.
Edward Lear
http://www.nonsenselit.org/Lear/ns/jumblies.html
Damia posted Fri, 01 July 2005 at 4:33 PM
~Damia~ LeviathanPhotography
DHolman posted Fri, 01 July 2005 at 7:05 PM
Whatever you use to change the contrast, just keep your eye on your histogram and on the image ... you should be able to see when the texture of the skin begins to blow out. If you still need contrast, you can keep going and then you can either use a clone stamp or some noise on an overlay layer to return some texture to the skin. As for the roots, yea ... if I really needed to do that, I would take care of that on a seperate layer, controlling the roots on their own so they don't go dark(er). And yup, I used curves and blending modes - a duplicate of the image blended with softlight and reduced opacity. -=>Donald
TomDart posted Fri, 01 July 2005 at 7:50 PM
I see this is an interesting thread...I have not tried to do any better than those images shown. The note is on the crop: Sheila, to me the crop is fine! Sure, the folks used to a snapshot might see something missing. Folks used to a better touch will like the crop. Go for it lady! God Bless in the hard times..or as a friend of mine at work would do, he would burn some sage for you. Tom.
danob posted Sat, 02 July 2005 at 6:57 AM
Danny O'Byrne http://www.digitalartzone.co.uk/
"All the technique in the world doesn't compensate for the inability to notice" Eliott Erwitt
tvernuccio posted Sat, 02 July 2005 at 8:28 AM
Danny, that looks GREAT! What kind of filter is that? Richard, thanks!!! i sure do like those tones, and i like how the details of their heads/hair are not lost in the background. for my tastes though, it's too flat. would work maybe if i added a glare filter to it? how did you do your postwork? Damia, you're so kind!!! i really do like that! i do use Virtual Photographer and did try some filters on it. which one did you use here, and did you use the standard settings or make your own adjustments? i don't think that's cheating!!!! :) it's still a bit too flat for my tastes, but perhaps a little glare filter on top of it!!! LOL!!!! thanks a bunch! :) Donald, i'll give it a whirl. Kemal's gonna help me try it. i've never used a histogram in postwork before. I know i did copy the image as a separate layer and tried some blending and just could never get it the way i wanted, but i haven't had much experience at doing that. i'll keep trying. Thanks!!! :) Tom, i didn't crop this one so i can't add back the top of her head if i wanted to. i was having a hard time seeing outside...i just asked them to lean their heads into each other's & i didn't realize i cut off part of Pam's head. Prayers and sage would be so much appreciated for my family!! thank you!!! :) ok guys, i will work on this one some more and see what i can do!!!! sure do appreciate all your help!!!!!! :)
Onslow posted Sat, 02 July 2005 at 10:31 AM
PSP - channel mixer = 35 35 33, clarify = 3, colorize = H 13 S 15, Levels = move top left slider in 10. Good luck with it I'm sure you will get the one you want in the end :)
And every one said, 'If we only live,
We too will go to sea in a Sieve,---
To the hills of the Chankly Bore!'
Far and few, far and few, Are the lands where the Jumblies
live;
Their heads are green, and their hands are blue, And they went to
sea in a Sieve.
Edward Lear
http://www.nonsenselit.org/Lear/ns/jumblies.html
Erlik posted Sat, 02 July 2005 at 1:27 PM
I really like what Donald did. OTOH, your BW version is quite similar.
-- erlik
tvernuccio posted Sun, 03 July 2005 at 8:18 AM
Richard...Thanks a bunch!!!! Vlatko...hmmm...didn't see that. i could bump up the contrast on it and see what happens. i'll have to see which one Pam likes! thanks guys!!!! :)
WiserAngel posted Wed, 06 July 2005 at 11:55 AM
I like #2 and #18 posts the best. They are both soft and flattering. I think I'm leaning towards the B & W #2 you did, Sheila.
tvernuccio posted Wed, 06 July 2005 at 6:39 PM
Hiya Rach!!!!!! nice seein' ya!!!! Thanks so much for your input!!!!!!!!! :) i haven't had time to work on this one anymore but i will. just lettin' it settle. sometimes i have to get away from an image for awhile, but i'll definitely begin working on it soon...maybe next week when my schedule will hopefully not be so crazy!!!!! :)