N.B. Repruduced from September **Glamour** in acordance to Fair Use provisions pertaining to educational , critical and journalistic use.

Ms. Tyler seems to have some sort of collar bend issues.

Hehehe we all do the same with our Vickys in the renderosity gallery ;-) Mazak

Message edited on: 08/21/2005 10:04

Google+ Bodo Nittel 

Who made this character? ;-). Is it available here? gg

LOL @ Singular3D Weird I think she's beautious in the original images as well.

They missed the glowing nostrils :o) :] Fish

"They missed the glowing nostrils :o) :] Fish" Firefly render. :D

Coppula eam se non posit acceptera jocularum.

My Store

My Gallery

Where's her sword?

And why does she have her clothes still on ? And where's the temple ??

---

Outdated gallery over at DeviantArt

Fics at FanFiction.net and Archive of Our Own (AO3)

LOL. The funny thing is, she's much prettier unretouched, imho. The retouched pictures are too "Michael Jackson," they go too far, she doesn't even look like herself. bB <-- who has bad retouch pet peeve

She is much sexier in her natural state. I have to touch up my DAZ figures to make them more realworld and to get some sexyness from these digital fashion maniquins. The liquid tool in Photoshop does wonder for giving curves, pudge, gravitationaly reflective breasts, and facial asymetry. I am not making freeks, just normal looking woman images. Works for me. It is amazing what realism you get by adjusting for slightly different sized or placed eyes and breasts that are not perfectly the same size. The expand and contract brushes in the liquid tool work wonders.

"LOL. The funny thing is, she's much prettier unretouched, imho. The retouched pictures are too "Michael Jackson," they go too far, she doesn't even look like herself." I had the same thought myself. I definately prefer the "before" image.

I would prefer her live next to me ;-))