kokabeel opened this issue on Nov 19, 2005 ยท 42 posts
kokabeel posted Sat, 19 November 2005 at 9:17 AM
You know I always wonder why people insist on posting nude vickies all the time. Not that there is anything wrong with it but it just seems that more and more of the art submitted is of bare chested vickies . As this is not to be an insult to those who do post only nude art I just question why people do it. I mean is it that people some how feel that if their art has "artistic" nudity(yes I do love some artistic nude renditions but the majority seems pornoish) in it it will score them more votes? Or is it that people often feel that since it's just 3D that it doesn't matter if she is nude or not.I have seen countless numbers of renditions,some good some bad. .For example,there is a certain artist whos work I love. He portrays women in artistic nudity which I do find to be "artistic". Then there are the infamous users who post big breasted vickies in every single image they create and it shows really no artistic value but more along the lines of perversion. Maybe it's just me,or has the 3D world gone from art to porn?