Forum: Photoshop


Subject: advice on processor for Photoshop & graphics use?

zescanner opened this issue on Mar 09, 2006 ยท 6 posts


zescanner posted Thu, 09 March 2006 at 12:56 AM

What processor type would you recommend for working with graphic-heavy software? I've had two people suggest to me that laptops are a bad idea for graphic use. One was a bit more specific in saying that frame-rate in games was too slow. I am interested in a laptop primarily for the benefit of being able to take it with me a do my computer art wherever I happen to be, rather than being tied to only doing it when I am at home (which explains why my gallery here is so small). With whatever computer I get I can upgrade the RAM and increase the HD size but I will be stuck with the processor that it comes with. What are the real performance differences between Pentium, Athlon, and Centrino? I was told that Centrino (in laptops) runs much cooler (a good thing) but that they were crappy for graphics. Is that so? In what way? I plan to use Photoshop, Painter, Bryce, DAZ-Studio & Poser. Maybe someday try Vue. And on the side I will also play games with it. If laptops are really at a noticably lower performance than a desktop then I will not go that route. Do any of you use a laptop for 3D rendering, 2D art (Photoshop & Painter), and graphic intensive gaming?


archdruid posted Thu, 09 March 2006 at 7:17 AM

For myself, I am an AMD fan, so I'd recommend an Athlon 64... the Duron isn't anywhere, nearly, good enough to use for graphics. Lou. Missed the last part.... I don't use a laptop, but there ARE some who do, and seem to be satisfied with it... Lou.

Message edited on: 03/09/2006 07:19

"..... and that was when things got interestiing."


tantarus posted Thu, 09 March 2006 at 8:00 AM

Laptop solution is posible for heavy duty. Some people work in Maya, 3DS and PS on laptop, but those are laptop beasts which are very expencive ;) Desktop solution would be much better, because for the average laptop money you can make custom high quallity desktop comp.. Take 1,5GB RAM or more, GeForce graphic card, Athlon at least 3000Mhz, HDD 200GB, CRT monitors are still better choice in my opinion, if you`ll use it for pro work ;) All of these cost even less than the average laptop ;) Hope this helps :) Tihomir




Open your mind and share the knowledge!


SeanE posted Thu, 09 March 2006 at 11:06 PM

I have an Acer Tavelmate 4200 with a 1.6 processor, 512Mb RAM and a 40Gb HDD and it works just fine running photoshop cs. Occasionally I get screen refesh burps and I have to pause for a moment while the computer catches up to what i want it to do but otherwise no hassles! but yes - RAM is the key - always get as much RAM as you can. 1Gb would be preferrable but you don't want anything less than 512Mb


zescanner posted Fri, 10 March 2006 at 11:43 AM

For anyone who is interested, I posted this same question in multiple forums looking for lots of suggestions. If you want to read the details look in the forums for Hardware/Technical, Adobe Photoshop, Painter, DAZ-Studio, Bryce, Vue and Poser. Thanx everyone for your great responses. This has been very helpful. There are varying preferences (as would be expected) but you all have given me much information and food-for-thought to help me make my selection. In a nutshell the consensus seems to be as follows: A desktop unit will be faster, better display, and cost less than a laptop. In that vein an Athlon AMD64 processor would be the top choice. Lotsa RAM for sure (1GB or better). DirectX 9+ and OpenGL 2+ is desirable. 256MB video memory. A laptop will cost more, be a bit less powerful and the display won't have the contrast range of a CRT. Having dual processors will compensate a lot by using one for the rendering and the other one for other tasks. As for processors: some said they are happy with Centrino. Andytw suggested the new Intel "Core" chips which replace Centrino will give similar performance to an AMD64. Actually using AMD chips will run hotter and battery life will be shorter. From what you tell me, in either case, COOLING is of EXTREME importance or whatever processor you have will not last so long. Now it comes down to this: I can spend less and get a machine that is rooted on one location, or I can spend more and get a machine that performs a bit slower and be able to take it with me from place to place. Still thinking on that. Will do some shopping and see what I can get. (Hardly anyone suggested prices! but I do know I won't be going the route of the $3000+ Alienware laptop!)


zescanner posted Fri, 10 March 2006 at 12:33 PM

Oh and by-the-way, I wanted to tell you what I currently have for a computer. I don't even remember how old this is. It is an HP Pavilion, 803Mhz Intel, running Windows 2000. A 32KB cache. 4x CDR. A couple of years ago I upgraded the video card, the RAM and added a hard drive. I now have NVIDIA GeForce 2 video, two HD's totaling about 140 GB and 390MB of RAM. It works but it is troublesome and tired.