TomDart opened this issue on Mar 20, 2006 ยท 22 posts
TomDart posted Mon, 20 March 2006 at 8:01 PM
I don't remember how I "aged" this modern photo. Do you have a new shot you would be willing to age a bit?
The process does not need plugins but that will speed stuff. If you desaturate a bit, add a sepia tone, perhaps a bit of blur and blend all together you have it done. The tone can be traditional orange/red sort of sepia or bluer to mimic some old metallic photos.
Do you want to give it a try? I want to try again on some suitable image...I believe I can do better now, perhaps.
I do think seeing old photos helps! The fading is part of the image..how and where the image goes more to an
"overexposed" look from fade and then just how old images did look and look today, whether metallic or on some early papers. We will see if anyone is interested! TomDArt. PS>this shot is more surreal about war than I would generally use to "age" a photo. Aged shots do have fade and this one does not. Then again..how would it look fresh and new at that time in history? Both are options..old or old technique.
Message edited on: 03/20/2006 20:04
TomDart posted Mon, 20 March 2006 at 9:07 PM
My shot is not so much "aged" as it is an interpretation of a time...the original would not look like this. Still, a surreal sort of age is given to reflect a mood. Go for it! Got one? If the thread fails..ok. That is stuff and whats of the moment. : )
UKmac posted Mon, 20 March 2006 at 10:30 PM
UKmac posted Mon, 20 March 2006 at 10:31 PM
TomDart posted Tue, 21 March 2006 at 7:55 AM
Your cemetery pic certainly takes on a different mood with the applied age. That "mood" change is what I see in postwork like this, if it suits the purpose. Thanks. Thanks for the original to compare. I can't find my original..alas and shame on me. I file better now than back then.
solrac_gi_2nd posted Tue, 21 March 2006 at 11:16 AM
Carlos.
P.S.- good idea and challenge !
TwoPynts posted Tue, 21 March 2006 at 1:26 PM
Kort Kramer - Kramer Kreations
Valerie-Ducom posted Tue, 21 March 2006 at 2:03 PM
solrac_gi_2nd posted Tue, 21 March 2006 at 4:46 PM
TomDart posted Tue, 21 March 2006 at 7:41 PM
Very neat and wonderful posts! Yeah! TomD'Art.
Dynazty posted Tue, 21 March 2006 at 7:45 PM
TomDart posted Tue, 21 March 2006 at 8:22 PM
I like the blues. Great shots and postwork here! I am amazed! Carlos, yours look like very old postcards, like some I have from my parents, long ago.
solrac_gi_2nd posted Tue, 21 March 2006 at 8:53 PM
Thanks Tom.
I've chosen very recent photos with 'themes' old enough to allow some 'photo ageing' via postwork.
There are excellent works here ... so far.
I would like to see more contributions !
Carlos.
TomDart posted Tue, 21 March 2006 at 9:11 PM
Carlos, I have one more to try for myself, a recent one. Thanks for feedback! Tom.
TomDart posted Tue, 21 March 2006 at 9:52 PM
TomDart posted Tue, 21 March 2006 at 9:54 PM
Dynazty, your shot takes this fellow back to the times of Jimi Hendrix.
solrac_gi_2nd posted Tue, 21 March 2006 at 9:58 PM
Tom,
Excellent old barn just as if it was photographed on the latest years of the XIXth century !
Carlos.
Dynazty posted Tue, 21 March 2006 at 10:07 PM
=) Thank-You ,,/_ love this, this was a cool idea and all excellent works so far...=)I copied the layer than I used the Reticulation Filter / than with the copy selected and in the layers palette I picked on color dodge to give it color from the lower layer....=)
girsempa posted Wed, 22 March 2006 at 11:39 AM
We do
not see things as they are. ǝɹɐ ǝʍ sɐ sƃuıɥʇ ǝǝs
ǝʍ
TomDart posted Wed, 22 March 2006 at 6:07 PM
girsempa, you got me on this one! Is it really old? Is is recent and "aged"? This certainly is aged. thanks!
girsempa posted Wed, 22 March 2006 at 6:33 PM
TomDart, it is recent (well, last year), shot in my living room at a birthday party for the girl on the right.
We do
not see things as they are. ǝɹɐ ǝʍ sɐ sƃuıɥʇ ǝǝs
ǝʍ
solrac_gi_2nd posted Wed, 22 March 2006 at 6:38 PM
Ecellent Geert !!!