marvlin opened this issue on Jul 09, 2006 · 16 posts
marvlin posted Sun, 09 July 2006 at 2:38 PM
Hi Guys, time to pick your collective brains again.
I have been rendering my final images using the full default firefly settings.
However having done a search and read some of the posts I found it appears some of you feel these are really not the way to go.
I realise it is very much "Horses for courses" so I have enclosed below the settings I am currently using and a sample picture which is typical of the sort of thing I am rendering.
Could you please advise me on the best settings to achieve the most realistic image.
I am not concerned about time or resources as I have modified my poser.exe to enable the use of RAM over 2 GIG.
Many Thanks
Marv
i7 5930K 3.60Ghz | ASUS X99-S Motherboard | Crucial Ballistix Sport 32GB DDR4 2400MHz RAM | NVIDIA TitanX | Antec 1000w Power supply | Windows 10 x64 Home
marvlin posted Sun, 09 July 2006 at 2:43 PM
i7 5930K 3.60Ghz | ASUS X99-S Motherboard | Crucial Ballistix Sport 32GB DDR4 2400MHz RAM | NVIDIA TitanX | Antec 1000w Power supply | Windows 10 x64 Home
marvlin posted Sun, 09 July 2006 at 2:44 PM
i7 5930K 3.60Ghz | ASUS X99-S Motherboard | Crucial Ballistix Sport 32GB DDR4 2400MHz RAM | NVIDIA TitanX | Antec 1000w Power supply | Windows 10 x64 Home
vxg139 posted Sun, 09 July 2006 at 2:58 PM
On a separate topic, Can you please advise how you reconfigured Poser to take advantage of additional RAM. I have 4 GB RAM and would love to use it with Poser....
FYI, I am using windows XP home edition...
relating to your post, I use Poser 4 rendering option in P6 and am afraid can't be much help... :c(
Thank you
vxg139
marvlin posted Sun, 09 July 2006 at 3:37 PM
Hi mate, with regards to the Memory mod, if you go here:
http://www.stewreo.de/poser/3gb.html
It tells you all about it.
Regards
Marv
i7 5930K 3.60Ghz | ASUS X99-S Motherboard | Crucial Ballistix Sport 32GB DDR4 2400MHz RAM | NVIDIA TitanX | Antec 1000w Power supply | Windows 10 x64 Home
Miss Nancy posted Sun, 09 July 2006 at 3:39 PM
render looks very good to me, excepting the ambient is too low and cold, shadows too harsh, artifacts on curtain, et al.
marvlin posted Sun, 09 July 2006 at 4:10 PM
Thanks Miss Nancy, I agree with you on all counts and I appreciate you taking the time to help :o)
However I am really looking for advise on render settings as regards the options in the firefly settings window ;o)
i7 5930K 3.60Ghz | ASUS X99-S Motherboard | Crucial Ballistix Sport 32GB DDR4 2400MHz RAM | NVIDIA TitanX | Antec 1000w Power supply | Windows 10 x64 Home
thefixer posted Sun, 09 July 2006 at 5:04 PM
For that sort of scene I wouldn't go above 2048 for texture size, my bucket would be set for 32, displacement ticked if using, raytrace bounce at 3, Minumum shading rate at 0.5, Pixel samples at 5, Post filter at 1 and box! Shadows and raytracing ticked.
That would be my settings for that type of scene!
Injustice will be avenged.
Cofiwch Dryweryn.
raven posted Sun, 09 July 2006 at 5:32 PM
marvlin posted Sun, 09 July 2006 at 5:48 PM
Thanks Guys, much appreciated, I'll give them a go ;o)
i7 5930K 3.60Ghz | ASUS X99-S Motherboard | Crucial Ballistix Sport 32GB DDR4 2400MHz RAM | NVIDIA TitanX | Antec 1000w Power supply | Windows 10 x64 Home
modus0 posted Sun, 09 July 2006 at 9:06 PM
You can probably turn off Raytracing if there's nothing in the scene that doesn't take advantage of it, that might speed things up a bit as well.
________________________________________________________________
If you're joking that's just cruel, but if you're being sarcastic, that's even worse.
marvlin posted Mon, 10 July 2006 at 12:33 AM
Hehe, I'm not trying to speed things up guys, just want to get the best possible quality render settings :op
i7 5930K 3.60Ghz | ASUS X99-S Motherboard | Crucial Ballistix Sport 32GB DDR4 2400MHz RAM | NVIDIA TitanX | Antec 1000w Power supply | Windows 10 x64 Home
modus0 posted Mon, 10 July 2006 at 1:29 AM
Still, if you don't have anything that requires it, Raytracing isn't going to make things better, AFAIK.
________________________________________________________________
If you're joking that's just cruel, but if you're being sarcastic, that's even worse.
marvlin posted Mon, 10 July 2006 at 6:32 AM
Quote - Still, if you don't have anything that requires it, Raytracing isn't going to make things better, AFAIK.
Indeed, no argument there ;o)
i7 5930K 3.60Ghz | ASUS X99-S Motherboard | Crucial Ballistix Sport 32GB DDR4 2400MHz RAM | NVIDIA TitanX | Antec 1000w Power supply | Windows 10 x64 Home
Miss Nancy posted Mon, 10 July 2006 at 2:20 PM
ray-tracing will actually make things look better, unless there are no objects or lighting in the scene, or it's a toon render. in addition, cutting back on ray-trace bounces is also a bad idea. they added ray- tracing and alotta other features to poser precisely because P4 renders were the laughing stock of the 3D community.
unzipped posted Mon, 10 July 2006 at 3:46 PM
Attached Link: Thread I started discussing render settings
Hi, here's a thread I put up a couple of months ago that's related. I don't know if you caught this one, or if it would help any, but I think it might have some info/insight from the people who chimed in that you might find useful.