Forum: Bryce


Subject: Hot 20 replacement?

AgentSmith opened this issue on Jul 14, 2006 · 64 posts


AgentSmith posted Fri, 14 July 2006 at 2:36 AM

My bad...I forgot to announce the new Renderosity "Art Charts". Check'em out, & voice yer opinion!  ;o)

LINK

Contact Me | Gallery | Freestuff | IMDB Credits | Personal Site
"I want to be what I was when I wanted to be what I am now"


Cyba_Storm posted Fri, 14 July 2006 at 3:39 AM

40 out of 50 pix POSER CRAP. Top 50 Artist POSER LOSERS. Top 50 merchants people selling crap to POSER LOSERS. I can see how things have improved. NOT.


AgentSmith posted Fri, 14 July 2006 at 4:41 AM

Okay...

Contact Me | Gallery | Freestuff | IMDB Credits | Personal Site
"I want to be what I was when I wanted to be what I am now"


Mahray posted Fri, 14 July 2006 at 5:12 AM

Cyba_Storm: Be honest mate, don't let anyone stop you from letting your true feelings be known!

Come visit us at RenderGods.

Ignore the shooty dog thing.


RodsArt posted Fri, 14 July 2006 at 5:55 AM

OY...I feel my Drac blood count rising, but I won't go there. Bottom line: whatever keeps this site alive is OK.

(cherishing my "yin-yang")grin

ICM

___
Ockham's razor- It's that simple


rj001 posted Fri, 14 July 2006 at 6:56 AM

well i used to get an occasional placing in the Bryce only chart but i guess i'll fade away when its a whole site gig or did i miss something, never mind maybe i should do more T&A.or even better a Fractal T&A.

Experience is no substitute for blind faith.

http://avalon2000.livejournal.com/ - My Art Blog

http://jeferies.jalbum.net/Richard%20Jeferies%20Future%20Perfect/


AgentSmith posted Fri, 14 July 2006 at 7:37 AM

"per" gallery art charts would be good, otherwise like it or not, Poser will dominate over everything.

Contact Me | Gallery | Freestuff | IMDB Credits | Personal Site
"I want to be what I was when I wanted to be what I am now"


vangogh posted Fri, 14 July 2006 at 9:13 AM

Cyba_Storm does make a point. Most Poser art is unbelievably pathetic. Mostly it's the overabundance of zombie stares that tend to zone out my brain, but when you add in all the glowing and light filled nostrols, greatly exaggerated breasts and excrusiatingly bad poses....well then....you do have the sum total of crap produced by losers. This is not to say that all Poser images are crap, cause I have seen some truly creative and very well done images produced in Poser. Images that are just as good as anything seen in the galleries of cgtalk that were produced in programs that are alot more highend than lowly Poser. But the majority of images done in Poser, at least on this site, are nothing more than people playing with dolls, or little adolesent boys getting their kicks by overexaggerating the size of Vicks breasts. rj001...you and I are in the same boat. The Art Charts is nothing more than the Hot 20 morphing into the Hot 50 with now everyone playing in the same backyard.


Gog posted Fri, 14 July 2006 at 11:07 AM

Hmmm, how do I put this:

I agree: there is a lot of poser produced rubbish, I would like to see the charts available filtered for application.

I disagree: Some poser artists are genuinely that artist producing good stuff, and there is actually some good stuff in the chart.....

So I'm holding the middle line......

----------

Toolset: Blender, GIMP, Indigo Render, LuxRender, TopMod, Knotplot, Ivy Gen, Plant Studio.


tjohn posted Fri, 14 July 2006 at 12:03 PM

Lists that are based on the number of fav artists and fav images that people get in a week (like the new art charts) seem like most of the best art of the week will be left out.

IS there a fair way of doing this? I doubt it.

If it's based on votes, views, ratings, comments, whatever, someone will find a way to skew the results.

I'll just depend on getting ebots for MY favs, and do some occasional gallery surfing.

And we thought the old Hot20 was bad. 👎

This is not my "second childhood". I'm not finished with the first one yet.

Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana.

"I'd like to die peacefully in my sleep like my grandfather....not screaming in terror like the passengers on his bus." - Jack Handy


Flak posted Fri, 14 July 2006 at 8:54 PM

To do with the list of top images in the chart...

 

The current setup as I understand it simply favours the big galleries... which means byrce images would have a much better chance than say Lightwave of making the chart, but poser images would have the bext chance to make the chart (more images get posted to the poser gallery which means more people are viewing the images in that gallery, which means that more people will comment/fav the images than they would for a similar quality image in a smaller less viewed gallery).

 

I'd be curious to know what the list would look like if you normalized the numbers of favourites for an image against the number of images posted to that gallery, thus elliminating to some degree the inherent bias towards the more heavily posted to galleries.

 

But then... what would I know lol

Dreams are just nightmares on prozac...
Digital WasteLanD


Dann-O posted Fri, 14 July 2006 at 9:07 PM

        I do think it will end up being skewed. I can see rainbow pictures with rings of people who favorite them. There is no consideration for just plain number of views.People can come up with 10 freinds who will add images to their favorites and then they get in the top 50 easy as pie to rig it and it will be.

       There are more metrics to view pics on so that is kind of cool so there is a small improvement in some areas. I share Cyba Storms view of poser  but I also realize that is where Rosity's bread is buttered so it is a moot point.

   Maybe once ther ecan be art charts for different packages and even different Genres then that might get interesting.

The wit of a misplaced ex-patriot.
I cheated on my metaphysics exam by looking into the soul of the person next to me.


bikermouse posted Fri, 14 July 2006 at 10:04 PM

Speak of the devil ... it is rumoured that there are those who don't need Poser to create characters. In the slumbering  proliferation of Poser characters these mighty magicians have been forgotten in the top twenty and lo scorned by those of lesser talents who deem Poser as the Be all and end all of characer creation. But buried deep in the bowels of a Bryce terrain work those who know the mysteries that soon will be revealed to and honered by all with unwashed minds. Until that day ....

sholan-tru,
-TJ(Mouse who rides a motorcycle - not mouse from BiKor provence) 

 


Cyba_Storm posted Sat, 15 July 2006 at 4:11 AM

We need a change of culture in Rosity. We need people to rate any image they have a feeling about.  If you like it give it a top rating, but if you hate it nail it to the wall.  If POOR Poser images annoy you then rate them as crap. If Bryce images of WATER AND REFLECTIVE SPHERES get your back up, same deal.

We need it set up so you don't need to comment, just rate.

Don't use number of views, but peoples rating of the image. Change the rating system from 1-5 to 1-10. The top 50 images bases on average (After a minimum number of ratings.20??. ) then make the list.

Same with ARTISTS. An artist must have posted a minimum number of images. The artists with the top 50 averages make the list.

For the 3rd colomn remove Merchant, and highlight a different each month. STYLE. Sci-fi, Glamour, Military, etc.  This will encourage people to try that style, and possibly make the top 50.

Poser may tend to still dominate, but  ANY image with a high average has a chance of making the cut. A great photo, an interesting abstract, or a fantastic fractal with enough support can make the grade.

PS. I DON"T hate Poser. My FAVORITES contains Poser images. There are people who can make that program sing.  My gripe is with the lack of imagination, and skill level of the average user. I know it is hard to create props, and clothing. But you cannot take other peoples props, clothing and poses and expect the same rating as someone creating ALL of there own image. A lot of Poser users do.

 

 


RobertJ posted Sat, 15 July 2006 at 6:32 AM

Well the H50 is even more than the H20 a showcase of a popularity poll. Wich is good in my opinion, you people should go out to the galleries and admire the true talent and hard work that can be found there. As usual 90% of everything is crap, its that other 10% that makes it all worth it.

How about a rating ranging from -5 to 5?

Robert van der Veeke Basugasubasubasu Basugasubakuhaku Gasubakuhakuhaku!! "Better is the enemy of good enough." Dr. Mikoyan of the Mikoyan Gurevich Design Bureau.


PJF posted Sat, 15 July 2006 at 6:51 AM

"Top 50 Artist POSER LOSERS."

To observational and/or numerical incompetence you add logical incoherence.

"We need a change of culture in Rosity."

Not enough, apparently, for you to campaign for it in the location AgentSmith linked to. For the fastest change to your Renderosity cultural experience I recommend you duplicate your first post there.

 


Dann-O posted Sat, 15 July 2006 at 8:07 AM

       Thanks Bikermouse. Yeah I have been working my character modeling quite a bit latley. (much to the chagrin of those who like my airplane pics)

       Well took a quick look at the top 10. 2 photos 1 terragen piece 6 pieces of softcore poser porn and 1poser beaver shot. Hmmmm. I tend to agree with cyba storm.

      There generally is no appreaciation for the creative process and this is one of the reasons the people who actually are good are leaving. You certainly don't see the top people at CG talk posting here. Many did at one time but the cult of mediocrity drove them away. No respect for the creative process. The attitude of hitting your instant poser make people button is the same as building them up polygon by polygon.

   Personally I think there has been a change in culture here. It has gone from a general 3D site to a softcore porn station. (don't beleive me look at that top 50) Generally porn does not bother me but when I come to a 3D site I don't expect to get a barrage of it so I can't peruse the galleries without nudie thumbs and the like I have a family here I just want to look at airplanes and spaceships and cartoons. I think it is too much to ask.

The wit of a misplaced ex-patriot.
I cheated on my metaphysics exam by looking into the soul of the person next to me.


Cyba_Storm posted Sat, 15 July 2006 at 8:59 AM

@PJF: Getting the words POSER and CRAP in the same sentence on any link that links to the front page does not happen. I know. I've tried.

Like his name sake Agent Smith is a little less zealous than his masters where the Poser god is concerned. A fair hearing is possible here.


PJF posted Sat, 15 July 2006 at 9:40 AM

What, you mean to say you can't describe artists' work as "crap" and call them "losers" on the front page? How desperately unfair.
Thank God we're so much more tolerant in here.

 


PJF posted Sat, 15 July 2006 at 10:23 AM

"Well took a quick look at the top 10. 2 photos 1 terragen piece 6 pieces of softcore poser porn and 1poser beaver shot."

Softcore pornography:
http://www.renderosity.com/mod/gallery/index.php?image_id=1248072

Softcore pornography:
http://www.renderosity.com/mod/gallery/index.php?image_id=1248441

Softcore pornography:
http://www.renderosity.com/mod/gallery/index.php?image_id=1250498

Softcore pornography:
http://www.renderosity.com/mod/gallery/index.php?image_id=1251723

Here's a thought for you, Dann-O:
http://forums.cgsociety.org/showthread.php?t=188071

 


Dann-O posted Sat, 15 July 2006 at 7:57 PM

PJF From someone who has no gallery and no favorites you certainly like to stir the pot. I look at those things to determine how much I should value your opinion. Well you can guess how much I value yours.

You are probably a person who can't see a difference between making a poser pic and buiding up a character polygon by polygon. Sad thing is it a bit more difficult to pose people with clothes on then making nudie pics.

I probably should not have said softcore porn but nudie pics. I think there is so much more that can be done than what is done.  Remember this is supposed to be the best of the best.  You go to other 3D sites and look what is their best. What we have seems cheap and tawdry in comparison.

The wit of a misplaced ex-patriot.
I cheated on my metaphysics exam by looking into the soul of the person next to me.


IO4 posted Sat, 15 July 2006 at 11:55 PM

Rather than having one art chart, why not have (as well as or instead of ) seperate charts  for each gallery. The links to the gallery charts could be on one page headed 'Art Charts' (and perhaps just have  thumbnail or link of the current top image from each gallery on this page). That way there would be some appreciation of the great images that are produced by the less popular (ie less well known) apps. That's the one thing I did like about the Hot 20 - I could choose which gallery category to look at and quite often it introduced me to artist's work that I had never come across before.

There will always be someone that is not happy with whatever set up there is, but maybe this would be one way to go.

What about a new monthly feature on the front page looking at  the other various applications 2d/3d that make up the gallery headings or the people that use them (perhaps professional artists), and the things you can do with them to give an insight in to what else is out there apart from Poser?

Beginners tutorials for Bryce

Bryce Arena


striving posted Sun, 16 July 2006 at 12:47 AM

There is nothing that can be done. It will always have to be based on something. And that something is always going to be effected by the artists amount of friends on the site. I just see this as another pointless addition for the artists on the site, and a grand addition to promote sales of products on R. Can't blame em. But I dont have to like it. haahaa.


striving posted Sun, 16 July 2006 at 12:49 AM

Quote - "Well took a quick look at the top 10. 2 photos 1 terragen piece 6 pieces of softcore poser porn and 1poser beaver shot."

Softcore pornography:
http://www.renderosity.com/mod/gallery/index.php?image_id=1248072

Softcore pornography:
http://www.renderosity.com/mod/gallery/index.php?image_id=1248441

Softcore pornography:
http://www.renderosity.com/mod/gallery/index.php?image_id=1250498

Softcore pornography:
http://www.renderosity.com/mod/gallery/index.php?image_id=1251723

Here's a thought for you, Dann-O:
http://forums.cgsociety.org/showthread.php?t=188071

 

LOL.. you have a couple Portraits in there marked as Softcore Porn! WTF? I wouldn't go that far.


PJF posted Sun, 16 July 2006 at 10:27 AM

"I probably should not have said softcore porn but nudie pics."

Yes, that would have been better, for it would have confirmed that you either hadn't even looked at the top ten image favourites or you were clinically blind. The same possible problems appear to have inflicted your examination of my repost, for despite direct links to the full images you failed to see that three of top ten favourites you labelled "softcore porn" are not nude - two are head portraits that don't even go below the shoulder! Try the link I provided to the illustrious CGI Talk gallery image and have a careful look at what they show there.

** **

"PJF From someone who has no gallery and no favorites..."

Boring. The observation that I have no Renderosity gallery or favourites (I'm also wearing odd socks at the moment) has no bearing on the fact that what you said was demonstrably untrue. That's not a question of opinion, that's simply observable fact.

Also a demonstrable fact is that this website used to be called "Poser Forum Online". It did not start off as a general 3D site; it went from being a Poser user's website to a being a general online art community. Despite expanding to having forums for thirty-three CG programs as well as traditional arts, photography and writing (plus galleries for all those), it still retains its Poser momentum (especially in the store).

Also a demonstrable fact is that Renderosity has become less tolerant of sexually based images over time, along with being more restrictive of member expression in the forums (disneyfication is what the process is nicknamed). As for people leaving, PoserPros started in part because of the restrictions not for the lack of them.

 

It's quite amusing that you should accuse me of stirring the pot when you are openly bemoaning the progress of Renderosity with arguments based on untruths. Even more amusing is that your untruths are so easily exposed by anyone who can be bothered to look.

**
"You go to other 3D sites and look what is their best. What we have seems cheap and tawdry in comparison."**

Oh well, if it's so bad there's always the Bryce forum at CG Talk.

 

Oh, wait...


PJF posted Sun, 16 July 2006 at 10:31 AM

"LOL.. you have a couple Portraits in there marked as Softcore Porn! WTF?"

Not I, stiving. But yeah, WTF?


CrazyDawg posted Sun, 16 July 2006 at 1:54 PM

i said it once and i'll say it again....this site has gone to the dogs

I have opinions of my own -- strong opinions -- but I don't always agree with them.


 



tjohn posted Sun, 16 July 2006 at 2:18 PM

Arf. 😄

This is not my "second childhood". I'm not finished with the first one yet.

Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana.

"I'd like to die peacefully in my sleep like my grandfather....not screaming in terror like the passengers on his bus." - Jack Handy


catlin_mc posted Sun, 16 July 2006 at 4:49 PM

Oh the fun to be had at this site is overwhelming at times. rolf 8D

PJF you are still one of my favourite Brycers even if you don't have a pic in your gallery. 8)

The hot one doesn't bother me 'cos I've only ever had 1 image sent there and that just happened to be a nude rendered in Bryce, maybe I should do another one, maybe I'll get int the hot one again. lol 8)

Cyba_Storm has said exactly what I used to feel about this site when I first started, that was until I got my hands on Poser and discovered I rather like it. But what was said is still mainly true, you've got about 90% total crap and another 10% good to excellent in Poser land but if you take a good look at all the galleries then you will see that it's about the same rating for every kind of software out there.

Nuff said, I think I'll go render somethng, now which program should I use..............

Catlin


Rochr posted Sun, 16 July 2006 at 7:39 PM

Personally i don´t care about the new Art Charts, but this is not exactly an improvement from the Hot20, it´s actually worse.
Apart from Czarnyrobert, Beton and very few others, it´s pretty much naked flesh all the way. And somehow i doubt that will change... 😉

Rudolf Herczog
Digital Artist
www.rochr.com


deadgirl1 posted Sun, 16 July 2006 at 11:57 PM

OK, this is my very first post. I spent a lot of time viewing the charts. I DID see a typically very uncreative tendency (in the nudie-soft-porn or whatever images) that was repeated a lot.

It's that tired old, same-O same-O look on the women's faces. I think somebody called it a "zombie" look, which was very apt. This is something you see on real porn pics, and it makes me laugh! The women lack facial expressions, unless you wanna count the look that makes them resemble somebody who is either about to vomit, or already has.

You know that look -- mouth gaping open and slack-jawed, eyelids half-closed, glazed look to the eyes. All that's missing is the chunks and drool! I often wonder how that look ever came to be considered as "sexy." It's ridiculous and it's way past time for a change. Who is up for leading the way?

If people are gonna render what they hope to be sexy images, I certainly hope they will seriously consider giving the women's faces some LIFE, some CHARACTER. And why not have the women actually doing something other than standing or sitting there doing nothiing? And I am not talking about  X-rated activities.


Incarnadine posted Wed, 19 July 2006 at 2:10 PM

There is only one thing that I dislike intensly about poser (or at least the P4 I have) - the camera systems, each figure has it own camera. Whenever you try to create a multifigure group with interaction, switching from one to the next pops you around view-wise in a truly aggravating manner! Other than that, I find it a useful tool.
I don't think these art sheets are something I am really interested in.
Rendo is a general community now. That means rank amatures to seasoned pro's (and we do have a bunch (at least in the C4D forum)). Yes there are more over at CGTalk but that site is targetted at the professional user.

Pass no temptation lightly by, for one never knows when it may pass again!


pauljs75 posted Mon, 24 July 2006 at 10:13 PM

If artwork here should be judged, then why not use a +/- 5 rating system and use that to keep score. Then not only could there be a top 20, but a bottom 20 as well. It seems wrong, but curiousity would definitely get people (I know I would) to look at just how bad something must be to get the most -5 votes. Negative scoring could also balance out anything positive and vice versa, so the rating would probably be more fair.


Barbequed Pixels?

Your friendly neighborhood Wings3D nut.
Also feel free to browse my freebies at ShareCG.
There might be something worth downloading.


duo posted Tue, 25 July 2006 at 7:22 AM

As IO4 said on one of my post on this forum,  Brycers artists are often underrated,  and maybe Renderosity should do a category Merchant of the Month too, as well as an overall on, eg Bryce merchant of the month feature, or Vue merchant of the month feature etc.
The same it would have to be made on this  "new" Art Charts...
I have many Bryce stuff on sell on Renderosity and I earn some money selling in them , but also if I sell US $150 in a month (my top month sale during Christmas) I'm still around 350 in the top sellers chart (how much eran the people in the sellers top ten?).
I do my artworks ONLY because I like it and NOT because I want attention, but difficultly I will be the "Merchant Of the Month" or the "Artist Of the Month" with Bryce (and not even the others Brycers)
Perhaps the "quest for success" is only a (Poser?) "breast" matter... :(


duo posted Tue, 25 July 2006 at 7:46 AM

I add to my reply above something more: a copy of an email (from another thread) that CrazyDawg Renderosity member sent to the Renderosity admin after recieving their newsletter.. He don't expect to get a reply from them... I totally agree with CrazyDawg...

Hi, i'm sorry to send you this email but something needs saying on this
subject.

First of all i have noticed that like most other sites Renderosity is
showing more interest in anything for poser. What i mean by this is you go
to the site and the first thing you see is a page full of poser items, you
get a newsletter and what is it full of poser items that are on the market
place or free.

Now i'm not sure about you lot that run the site but i know there are more
than just "poser" or "Daz studio" users on your site.
Please correct me if i am incorrect on this but i believe Renderosity is a
community of people interested in the 3d graphics, this would then point out
that they are not just poser users but use other programs for the 3d
graphics they like doing.

It would be nice seeing things for these other programs on the newsletter
and the page you see when one first go to the site.
If it is your intention to highlight the fact you have a large interest in
poser then may i suggest you change the site name from Renderosity.com to
Renderposer.com.

Thank you.


CrazyDawg posted Tue, 25 July 2006 at 10:41 AM

Hence the reason i don't post images on this so called 3d community site nor do i say much on the forum. i might read things others say or look at images they have done but until the Staff at Renderosity turn this site back to a 3d artist community and not one for only those that use poser i'll continue only being a visitor here..

CrazyDawg

 

 

I have opinions of my own -- strong opinions -- but I don't always agree with them.


 



Cyba_Storm posted Wed, 26 July 2006 at 12:38 AM

Maybe they should change the name of the site to POSEROSITY. 


tjohn posted Wed, 26 July 2006 at 3:06 AM

As a sometime 2d artist, I use this opportunity to remind all that this is an Art site. All are welcome here. 😄

This is not my "second childhood". I'm not finished with the first one yet.

Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana.

"I'd like to die peacefully in my sleep like my grandfather....not screaming in terror like the passengers on his bus." - Jack Handy


duo posted Wed, 26 July 2006 at 4:00 AM

2d artists have the same problems her of the "NOT TOTALLY POSER" artists... perhaps more...


CrazyDawg posted Wed, 26 July 2006 at 5:17 AM

EBot dragged me back..must remember to untick box.

Ok, let me put something straight here and thank you to the two very kind IMs i had lastnight from two well known artist on this site.

I am not having a go at anyone that uses poser for their art work nor am i having a go at any of the many poser merchants for placing their items on the market. I don't mind looking at art done in poser/daz studio or anyother program no matter how good or bad it is, your art might just place an idea for something in my head which i can work on.

My beef is with the staff of this site which when i first joined it was a community for all forms of art done with 3d/2d programs, now all i see is art and merchants mainly to do with poser. I believe when they state the site is a community for 2d/3d artist then they should also advertise items on the newsletter and front page to do with all other 2d/3d programs...

CrazyDawg

I have opinions of my own -- strong opinions -- but I don't always agree with them.


 



duo posted Wed, 26 July 2006 at 4:46 PM

I usually use ALSO Poser in my art and as you I am not having a go at anyone that uses poser for their art or their market.
Again I think as CrazyDawg:

Quote: I believe when they state the site is a community for 2d/3d artist then they should also advertise items on the newsletter and front page to do with all other 2d/3d programs...


PJF posted Wed, 26 July 2006 at 5:16 PM

"My beef is with the staff of this site which when i first joined it was a community for all forms of art done with 3d/2d programs, now all i see is art and merchants mainly to do with poser."

LOL, CrazyDawg joined about eighteen months ago. Renderosity was as Poser dominated then as it is now; if anything more so.

This is like looking at a rant by someone complaining that the sky was better when it was green instead of the blue it is now.  If this was a serious subject it would be quite disturbing.

End universal suffrage now. ;-)

 


duo posted Wed, 26 July 2006 at 5:24 PM

Perhaps someone will invent a breast generetor for Bryce... will it be in Bryce 6?


dvlenk6 posted Wed, 26 July 2006 at 6:56 PM

Well, the top rated image in the gallery is a Bryce image. There are lots of 2D, photography, Vue, etc. images.

Doesn't really seem like Poser has any huge numbers of images in the top rated images.

It is a popular program though, so I'd kind of expect a lot of Poser images in general.

Friends don't let friends use booleans.


CrazyDawg posted Wed, 26 July 2006 at 7:29 PM

**"LOL, CrazyDawg joined about eighteen months ago. Renderosity was as Poser dominated then as it is now; if anything more so."**PJF, it was very clever of you to notice when i joined Renderosity, shame you weren't so clever at noticing everything in my post, i did state when i joined the site it was a 2d/3d community. Sorry but back when renderosity was mainly a poser site i wasn't around computers, born, or into 3d graphics.

I have opinions of my own -- strong opinions -- but I don't always agree with them.


 



catlin_mc posted Thu, 27 July 2006 at 1:36 AM

I always knew you were a big baby CrazyDawg. lol 8)


CrazyDawg posted Thu, 27 July 2006 at 5:12 AM

Quote - I always knew you were a big baby CrazyDawg. lol 8)

Why am i a baby, because i have the backbone to put my opinion forward instead of sitting back in the shadows..

Well if thats the case i'm sorry for speaking up, maybe i'll just sit in the shadows as well and watch what happens to this site..

CrazyDawg

I have opinions of my own -- strong opinions -- but I don't always agree with them.


 



bikermouse posted Thu, 27 July 2006 at 5:38 AM

OK so I'm riding my giant duck one day and this guy says get down off that horse . .. .


tjohn posted Thu, 27 July 2006 at 2:19 PM

You don't get down off a horse, you get down off a duck. 😄

This is not my "second childhood". I'm not finished with the first one yet.

Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana.

"I'd like to die peacefully in my sleep like my grandfather....not screaming in terror like the passengers on his bus." - Jack Handy


pakled posted Thu, 27 July 2006 at 9:49 PM

it's just a new way to ignore the hot 20, which I did on a regular basis..;)

I wish I'd said that.. The Staircase Wit

anahl nathrak uth vas betude doth yel dyenvey..;)


bikermouse posted Fri, 28 July 2006 at 2:16 AM

Oh horsefeathers!  you don't get down off a duck until you get down off the duck otherwise you might get downed by the duck.


Dash101 posted Fri, 28 July 2006 at 9:47 PM

Ok well...

Yeah I have to agree with ROCHR here... I dont think its an improvement. It seems to me that flesh (softcore, poser crap WHATEVER you wanna call it) will always dominate. There's no changing that.

I dont really care about the Hot 20 or the Art Charts... I post here because I enjoy sharing my work. I would hope thats why everyone does it...  EVerything else doesn't matter.

....  www.jumppoint.org


Stephen Ray posted Fri, 28 July 2006 at 10:23 PM

But can I summit my image of Victoria 4,  rendered in Bryce 6, then vote for my own image 50 or 60 times,

to get into the top rating?

Stephen Ray



bikermouse posted Fri, 28 July 2006 at 11:11 PM

got my vote - vote early! vote often!


Cyba_Storm posted Sat, 29 July 2006 at 1:02 AM

2 questions. Does this come under Fantasy, Pin-up or realism? And why haven't you posted credits? I cannot believe you created that pose and hair yourself.


dvlenk6 posted Sat, 29 July 2006 at 3:17 AM

Stephen Ray, it's so beautiful!!! I love that natural pose, it really shows off her glowing skin. Just beautiful. Great Work.

Friends don't let friends use booleans.


catlin_mc posted Sat, 29 July 2006 at 5:18 AM

Quote-

"Sorry but back when renderosity was mainly a poser site i wasn't around computers, born, or into 3d graphics".

I wasn't having a go at you CrazyDawg, I just thought you must be very young going on what you said. 8)


Hythshade posted Tue, 08 August 2006 at 2:48 AM

@ rochr Your absoulutely right. To much emphasis is placed on the top 20. I understand why Brycers feel the need to be in the top 20. It's because there's just not that many places for us to show off what it can do. If you want your work seen though, the renderosity top 20 or top 50 whatever it's called, isn't gonna get you noticed. There's a whole big world out there. I use Bryce professionally. I have commissioned dozens of novels, and numerous magazine covers over the last year. I'll never get rich doing this but a few hundred dollars per Bryce pic isn't to shabby, and it's doing what I love to do. I didn't get there though by being concerned if my work shows up in the renderosity top 20.

I don't post here much anymore because it's just become to easy to get lost here in the sheer numbers of users. Renderosity is a great community for learning about Bryce, or chatting with your friends. Just don't expect to get anywhere here as an artist. That's the real reason why the truly great ones are all leaving. Even they started to get trampled by all the hobbyist poser people.


Rochr posted Wed, 09 August 2006 at 5:34 PM

Actually, i´m not so sure about the "not getting anywhere from here" part. Based on personal experience, you can very well get noticed by editors, recruiters etc. But naturally, the more places you post, the better your chances get. 
And although i agree with great art getting lost in the crowd, i think most of the larger communities/galleries suffer from the exact same thing. Nude characters generate more views regardless of where they´re posted. Unfortunatly. :glare:

Rudolf Herczog
Digital Artist
www.rochr.com


Conniekat8 posted Wed, 09 August 2006 at 7:24 PM

I was reading somewhere few months ago (I forget where, and I can't find a link now) that the cashflow in porno is significantly bigger then it is in mainstream hollywood movies (If those could be consiodered art, or at least artsy film entertainment).

If this is true, the prevalence of T&A in here is proportionate to the population at large, I suppose.

What I've learnd from some psych classes is that the drive for sexual fulfillment is typically much stronger then the drive for self efficacy and intellectual fulfilment (not to be confused with less important). When you try to mix the two, the stronger one is bound to prevail. When I look at what's hapenning here, my reaction is, hey, that stuff I learned way back, seem to fit.
Intellectual pursuits get more important after the sexual ones have been satisfied. Such is life.

So, it seems that if those whom prefer to come here for more intellectual and spiritual type pursuits would be better served if there was some sort of segregation between the genras (sp?). (I have no idea how I'd go about figuring out where to draw the line, that's yet another can of worms, better opened later.)

Don't tell me that most able bodied men (or women) in their prime and a loving partner will not set aside a book or a drawing or another piece of art for an, um, booty call when they're in the right mood... :m_tongue2:

One solution I see is to get guys to be more selective... um... nevermind, bad idea :P

Hi, my namez: "NO, Bad Kitteh, NO!"  Whaz yurs?
BadKittehCo Store  BadKittehCo Freebies and product support


PJF posted Wed, 09 August 2006 at 7:38 PM

"...the prevalence of T&A in here..."

True Ambience? ;-)

 


Hythshade posted Wed, 09 August 2006 at 8:42 PM

Yeah but Rudy you are the exception rather than the rule. You are gonna get your art noticed no matter where you post. That's not the case for alot of other people. I guess I really have it backwards what I said anyway. At least here at Rendo one of the only ways to get noticed for many Brycers is the top 20. I wasn't thinking of it like that when I wrote what I said. I guess what I am addressing are the artists that really have a strong desire to get their work seen. You know as well as I you just can't limit yourself to Renderosity and it's top 20. You might luck out and get an assignment if a recruiter or publisher happens to stumble upon your work. But in the galleries where it's just a free for all, then getting individual attention is extremely dificult.

I agree these top 20/voting things all have the same problems at any gallery that implements them. Even the juried galleries where they limit the uploaders all suffer from the same exact issues. Renderosity has been great for building my confidence levels in my abilities, and the sense of community is appealing as well. But, it hasn't yeilded many assignments, at least not for me. For that I have to rely on my own marketing skills.


Conniekat8 posted Wed, 09 August 2006 at 11:07 PM

***"...the prevalence of T&A in here..."
**True Ambience? ;-)
*Talented Artists!

Hi, my namez: "NO, Bad Kitteh, NO!"  Whaz yurs?
BadKittehCo Store  BadKittehCo Freebies and product support


Cyba_Storm posted Thu, 10 August 2006 at 6:12 AM

I thought T&A stood for talent and ambition. Or textures and animation.  I hope it doesn't mean Boobs and Bums. There is too much of that sort of thing in here.

Every second Poser image is a naked Vicki. They dominate the ART CHARTS. But this is probably not a good place to start an argument about the Hot 20 replacement.