Forum: Photography


Subject: Noise reduction software.

HeadlessBill opened this issue on Aug 07, 2006 · 7 posts


HeadlessBill posted Mon, 07 August 2006 at 12:12 AM

I'm interested in purchasing some noise reduction software and I'm kind of torn between Noise Ninja and Neat Image. I've tried the demos of both. I like the results from Neat Image slightly more, but I've been informed by someone that a friend of hers had his Mac trashed when he installed Neat Image. I've also been told by someone that Noise Ninja can get some excellent results but I would have to play with the settings and the manual is rather vague about what the settings control. Anyone have any recommendations? Personal experience? Samples?


Zacko posted Mon, 07 August 2006 at 12:22 AM

I´ve only tried out the demo-version of Noise Ninja, but i gotta say i definitly prefered NeatImage. My computer has never crashed because of it, but i´m not on a Mac either. But one thing that i find a bit annoying with NeatImage, is that ever so often when i use it as a plug-in from Photoshop.....it deletes all my palettes as it ships the picture back to PS. Not a biggie since i can just restore palettes, but still quite annoying at times. Good luck with your decision. 😄

How come we say 'It's colder than hell outside' when isn't it realistically always colder than hell since hell is supposed to be fire and brimstone?
____________________

Andreas

Mystic Pic


gwfa posted Mon, 07 August 2006 at 1:11 AM

Attached Link: Example

I'm totally content with NoiseNinja (used mainly as plugin-in PaintShop on Windows);


Gerald



girsempa posted Mon, 07 August 2006 at 3:43 AM

http://photography.about.com/od/noisereduction/ Just in case you need some additional information, the above link may help you make your decision...


We do not see things as they are. ǝɹɐ ǝʍ sɐ sƃuıɥʇ ǝǝs ǝʍ
 


TwoPynts posted Mon, 07 August 2006 at 9:48 AM

I've been using Neat Image for a while now and have to say I like the results I got better than what I got using a Noise Ninja demo, though it is a decent program as well. Also, I am on a Mac (a couple actually) and none of mine had problems with it.

Kort Kramer - Kramer Kreations


HeadlessBill posted Mon, 07 August 2006 at 11:20 PM

Thanks for the input guys. Zacko - Since I'm pretty new to using Photoshop, to problem with the custom palettes won't be much of an issue for me know, but thanks for the heads up when I start using them. gwfa - I love your Nina images. It's hard to tell that you had to de-noise the image. I may have some other questions for you about how you shoot. As you can tell by my most recent galley postings, I'm starting to do some similiar type photography. girsempa - Thanks for the link and the reviews were an interesting read. TwoPynts - Thanks. Good to know that Neat Image has not caused problems on the Mac. Still is going to be a hard decision.


TwoPynts posted Tue, 08 August 2006 at 9:28 AM

This may help...if you keep the images under 1024 for web use, the free version of Neat Image works just fine. I used to do that before I sprang for the full version. Whichever way you go, good luck! ~Kort

Kort Kramer - Kramer Kreations