astro66 opened this issue on Nov 20, 2007 · 12 posts
astro66 posted Tue, 20 November 2007 at 1:28 PM
Just posted an image to the gallery but shot info says the shutter speed was 5368709/536870912 when it should read 1/100? Any ideas as to what is going on here? 
www.natural-photo.co.uk
"Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God
made in establishing tonal relationships. ~Ansel
Adams"
TomDart posted Tue, 20 November 2007 at 8:50 PM
I geneerally just type mine in when I want to do that.. Sorry, cannot help with the glich.
gradient posted Tue, 20 November 2007 at 11:08 PM
Actually, 5368709/536870912 is so darn close to 1/100 ( Actually, 0.0099999998 sec)
I wouldn't worry about it...but I see what you mean...LOL!...must be a rendo glitch.
When I checked my EXIF viewer...your image showed 1/100 sec.
In youth, we learn....with age, we understand.
astro66 posted Wed, 21 November 2007 at 12:54 AM
I did think it must be a RR thing so I'm not worried, lol... however I did wonder if it might be a Nikon thing as I notice pretty much everyone else has it shown correctly. Although everyone else seems to be using Canon, lol. 
www.natural-photo.co.uk
"Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God
made in establishing tonal relationships. ~Ansel
Adams"
gradient posted Wed, 21 November 2007 at 1:14 AM
Maybe the Nikon is more precise than the Canon....
In youth, we learn....with age, we understand.
inshaala posted Wed, 21 November 2007 at 5:40 AM
I have noticed this in the past - but i have seen it more in photos which look like they have been taken with compact cameras and i just thought it was something to do with that. You know, 6mm lenses and all that jazz 
"In every colour, there's the light.
In every stone sleeps a crystal.
Remember the Shaman, when he used to say:
Man is the dream of the Dolphin"
Rich Meadows Photography
Radlafx posted Thu, 22 November 2007 at 7:05 PM
Yup, it's definitely Nikons fault It might be a problem with R'osity reading the exif info. I think there was a thread about this before (i could be wrong though).
Question the question. Answer the question. Question the
answer...
I wish I knew what I was gonna say :oP
astro66 posted Thu, 22 November 2007 at 11:48 PM
The mighty Nikon at fault? Never! :ohmy:
No to worry though, I guess the RR gremlins strike again :lol:
www.natural-photo.co.uk
"Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God
made in establishing tonal relationships. ~Ansel
Adams"
Celtic_Lass posted Mon, 26 November 2007 at 5:31 PM
ok so it's not just me haha
noticed on my upload today that the shutter speed seemed way weird
3125/1000000 it says here yet on my photoblog site it read at 3125/100
it's a nikon d300....... it must be the camera LOL
gradient posted Mon, 26 November 2007 at 6:41 PM
@Celtic Lass.....Yes, it is your camera!!!
Your D300 has a serious problem!
However, to help you out.....I would be willing to trade you my fully functional D70 for your defective D300....LOL
In youth, we learn....with age, we understand.
Celtic_Lass posted Mon, 26 November 2007 at 6:52 PM
Quote - @Celtic Lass.....Yes, it is your camera!!!
Your D300 has a serious problem!
However, to help you out.....I would be willing to trade you my fully functional D70 for your defective D300....LOL
HEHE ;-)
Radlafx posted Mon, 26 November 2007 at 11:23 PM
Quote - "@Celtic Lass.....Yes, it is your camera!!! Your D300 has a serious problem! However, to help you out.....I would be willing to trade you my fully functional D70 for your defective D300....LOL" :lol: Hahaha :lol:
Question the question. Answer the question. Question the
answer...
I wish I knew what I was gonna say :oP