Forum: Vue


Subject: Is it just me or is the quality of artists slowly thinning out here at Renderosi

Tablesaw opened this issue on Feb 02, 2008 · 68 posts


Tablesaw posted Sat, 02 February 2008 at 5:42 PM

You may or may not agree with my view on this thread but as I browse the images I'm a bit disappointed at the quality of work  I view these days? Are people just getting lazy and not  taking pride in there work?


smallspace posted Sat, 02 February 2008 at 6:27 PM

Just too busy to create anything lately.

I'd rather stay in my lane than lay in my stain!


AboranTouristCouncil posted Sat, 02 February 2008 at 6:48 PM

You may be getting bored with the images you see. There are only so many variations of a theme you can see before it loses its charm. If you have any favorite images from when you first joined Renderosity (2004), look at those and see if they are still as good as you remember them.
Probably not.
Also, the artists may not feel challenged here anymore and have either changed their interests and are now doing something else or decided to post elsewhere.
As each revision of software (including Vue) improves, an image that once took weeks to sweat into shape now only takes a single afternoon of effort. But this enhancement in programs does not make a better artist. If the artist doesn't have the eye for his concept, then you get some pretty amazing junk.

The prolifieration of models has also added to the morass. Its easy now to pick out the model that was used, and know instantly where it has been used before. Many (including me) lack the ability to create our own models, and must rely on the creativeness of others to help shape our images. (You have some great models by the way- thanks) Look at some of the popular  models offered only a short time ago, and you can see that they are really overused, and seem out of date now. No longer cutting edge. And some models, although very interesting seem limited in their scope, and can be greatly misused. (what's with the "See no Evil" model by Aery Soul? I must be too old as I don't understand it. Very talented artist(s) incredible work, but not my cup of tea.)

I was a lurker for the longest time (using a different name), admiring the occasional piece that caught my fancy, before I dared to attempt to post anything. I admit I am not a great artist, maybe not even a good artist as my images gets few hits, and even fewer reviews. Perhaps its because I get wrapped up in my 'art' and get pretty excited to show off my latest creation, only to shudder  when I go back and look at it some weeks later. Looks nothing like I remember it, and the flaws become glaringly evident. (case in point. caution: adult advisory)
Also, by looking under the 'What's Popular" section shows definite trends in who is looking and what they like to see. You'll see the same names and reviews under very similar images, or images posted by the same person. A downside of the 'Favorite Artist'. Get an email telling you that new image by your favorite artist is online, and go see it, leave feedback, and click elsewhere. Don't get me wrong, I love it when I get 'favorited' but it encourages me to do better, as I do not want to dissappoint a potential fan. I know how I feel when I an artist I favorited for a picture then produces what I think is junk. I don't leave feedback, although perhaps I should.
Still, this is a great place, and I think I can put up with the junk to see the occasional great image.

Mike

...Insert some witty or thought provoking comment here...


smallspace posted Sat, 02 February 2008 at 9:25 PM

I also have to say that it's hard to be motivated to post to the renderosity galleries when you know the work will be bumped off the first page in under 30 minutes. I don't know about other people, but it takes me a long time to do something good, and if I'm going to go to that sort of effort, I don't want to post it to a place where I know it will be instantly buried.  

I'd rather stay in my lane than lay in my stain!


Tablesaw posted Sat, 02 February 2008 at 9:36 PM

There was  a time when you clicked on " most commented " or "most viewed"and you'd sit back in awe of some amazing art, the author would explain the process and you learned from that. Now you get someone with a whole lot of worthless comments and a whole lot of  nothing to say! Being an artist, I thrive on creativity and thats what motivates me to greater heights. How do I get excited about two static figures gazing into poserland with crossed eyes and bad skin? Maybe its time to leave Renderosity?


AboranTouristCouncil posted Sat, 02 February 2008 at 9:44 PM

Yeah, that does bite. I've tried posting during less busy periods, but there is a reason that time is less busy, because nobody is there! Catch-22. Also hurts when someone posts right after you and gets a gazillion comments, and you look at it, and think, WTF?

Quote - I also have to say that it's hard to be motivated to post to the renderosity galleries when you know the work will be bumped off the first page in under 30 minutes. I don't know about other people, but it takes me a long time to do something good, and if I'm going to go to that sort of effort, I don't want to post it to a place where I know it will be instantly buried.  

...Insert some witty or thought provoking comment here...


AboranTouristCouncil posted Sat, 02 February 2008 at 10:14 PM

   It was those images that first attracted me to Renderosity early on, and I have learned a lot, even from the bad images (as in: I will never post anything that bad.)
   Perhaps there is a problem with sheer volume. There is too much to look at. Miss a week, and you will never know what you missed. Who has the time to pore over every picture? Keywords really don't seem to work.
    One of problems I see is that very few people are unwilling to critique an image, tell them that they need to work on this or that. One of my early images brought forth comments from a person I respect, and he was right. We emailed back and forth several times, and I fixed that picture (but have not posted it here) I think one of the reasons for the reluctance is that they could be perceived as an a-hole if they dare run counter to others opinions.
    That is one of the reasons I post my art here. I'm open to creative criticism. If you're going to tell me it sucks, tell me why it sucks. I may disagree, It may hurt my feelings, but thats the risk I take by posting an picture. Got to have a thick hide, and not have a mutual love fest (i.e. you praise my work, and I'll praise yours) Not everyone likes Mucha, nor does everyone like Norman Rockwell. (I'm neither by a long shot.)
    If you feel genuinely unhappy with Renderosity, what would you suggest to make it better?
Is there a better alternative? If so, where at?
    Perhaps there should be gallery moderators as well, who simply pick pictures and rate them base them solely on content, not the name of the submitter. They would have to be anonymous, and may even be a different person from week to week. Perhaps showcasing the best of that week in their gallery?I for one would like to see something along that venue.
    Before I started posting images here, I posted images over at the Daz art site when it first went online and was immensely disappointed by that experience. Turned out to be a spam fest, and what was with the head to head competition that they shoved down my throat?
   Maybe the comments should not be visible at all?
   Maybe its late and I'm just an old man rambling on about nothing.

Quote - There was  a time when you clicked on " most commented " or "most viewed"and you'd sit back in awe of some amazing art, the author would explain the process and you learned from that. Now you get someone with a whole lot of worthless comments and a whole lot of  nothing to say! Being an artist, I thrive on creativity and thats what motivates me to greater heights. How do I get excited about two static figures gazing into poserland with crossed eyes and bad skin? Maybe its time to leave Renderosity?

...Insert some witty or thought provoking comment here...


Tablesaw posted Sat, 02 February 2008 at 10:30 PM

What I don't get is why people feel so obligated to comment back on other images even when those images are not that interesting in the first place? Yet you read stuff like amazing, genius, awesome, fantastic...I sit here scratching my head many times asking...Am I not seeing it?


keenart posted Sat, 02 February 2008 at 11:46 PM

As a professional, you do not have to "get excited to get creative."  The passion never leaves you and you thrive on the thought of the next work, even when you do not know where it will take you.

No offense, but when you have to depend on others to stimulate you, you still have not become an artist.  And even when I see junk I still admire the work for the effort that went into its creation.  Models or not, it still takes "the person" to put it all together. 

I try not to grade other peoples work, just admire what they did, trite or not. 

As far a professinals go; you greet and move on.  It's our way of life, always trying to push to the next creative or talented level, and we often go in search of those who support that whereever it may take us.  You could say, just like children we outgrow our environment and relationships as we become more expoerienced. 

One should also remember that our curltural world is changing, and what was popular and or required a decade ago, no longer is.  I do not have collectors waiting at the door anymore, only a few who would buy a cheap print.  Times change.

jankeen.com


Tablesaw posted Sun, 03 February 2008 at 12:30 AM

No I don't need others to stimulate me (view my images) all were created from an artistic imaginative mind.  As an artist you are not right in your comment keenart...the passion does move in waves and there are times when you are floundering like a fish and then there are times when  you are riding the biggest wave. Art is gut wrenching at its best and if you put it out with ease then you are not an artist but a business man and a fraud.  There are artists and then there are set designers who believe themselves to be artists!


keenart posted Sun, 03 February 2008 at 1:31 AM

Art is to each, so I would not argue with you about your creative experience or how you obtain it. But, I have never had “artist block.” I love what I do, which always leaves me open to imagination and creativity. So I do not have to turn the emotional spicket on and off to get what I want.   That does not make art any less of art or fradulent by any means.

 

When a teacher many a student would ask, “What should I do?”  Many felt that inspiration was something tangible they had to go look for and find so they could record that great masterpiece that would propel them to fame.     

 

Rembrandt was famous not because he was a good painter or a great artist, but because he made a mistake as a businessman. 

 

A professional has spent so much time learning the trade all is second nature for them. It isn’t fraud, it is experience turned into talent. You do not need gut wrenching events in your life to create good or great art work. Rarely does a “gut wrenching high riding wave,” give you the masterpiece you seek. If you spend your life around great artists you may find that out.

jankeen.com


Tablesaw posted Sun, 03 February 2008 at 2:23 AM

I have not seen your art, but I doubt you have spent your life around  great artists as you say I have not. I won't get into quoting other artists from our past, as what was written in their behalf was not in their own handwritings. You are the same school of thought that believes a diploma is equivalent  to talent and any artist worth their salt knows long before they reach the so called  professional arena you speak of that what they pull from within does not come easily. You seem to speak of masterpieces as if they plop from ones butt, not so... As you can fill one large bookshelf with all the memorable works created by the most talented (not experienced) artists of our times.


thefixer posted Sun, 03 February 2008 at 4:01 AM

Well purely from a personal point of view, I think I do some pretty good stuff in a diverse subject area, I also get frustrated when I know I've done a good piece and maybe scrape 15 comments and then see what I consider a pile of crap getting 60, 70 + comments when as you say the eyes are dead or the poses stiff etc.

So I guess I agree with you in some context but not all, I think there are still some good artists here but they are being stifled by the "I'll comment on yours if you comment on mine" menatlity which means often the flotsam floats to the top!
Of course there are still top artists that get to the top on merit and artistic talent like Blackerie for example!

Injustice will be avenged.
Cofiwch Dryweryn.


silverblade33 posted Sun, 03 February 2008 at 4:23 AM

The original post reminds me of a similar post from an undesirable person a while ago..it's too similar.

Anyway.
 

Quote - As you can fill one large bookshelf with all the memorable works created by the most talented (not experienced) artists of our times.

THAT is one of the most arrogant, crass and ignorant things I've heard on art in a long time.
it is YOUR opinion.

Art is "good" as long as the person viewing it likes it. Doesn'tmatter if it was made on a PC or with bits of shell on sand. Only the viewer can say if, to him, i'ts truly memorable and important.
And YOU certainly have not seen much of the world's art, it's simply impossible. How many wonders have you never seen because the artist never shows, them? Or carves them in wood in some backwater etc?

As we get older, wee get more critical, that maybe your problem. I can't stand much from Hollywood now, lol, too smooth, polished and utterly non-human (real people have scars, bad teeth etc and they don't pose for perfect shots on perfect film).

Originally, art here blew me away because it was NEW. you are missing that important point.
Your "digital art virginity" has passed away so, yer more cynical...natural, but foolish not to recognize it ;)

I still see fantastic work here. But my standard of what's "amazing" has gone up.
So stop being Mr Scrooge and enjoy, before yer weighed down with the chains of dispepsia, grumpiness, arrogance and hubris.

In othe words, stop being an old fart and ENJOY life and art while ye can! :tt2:

"I'd rather be a Fool who believes in Dragons, Than a King who believes in Nothing!" www.silverblades-suitcase.com
Free tutorials, Vue & Bryce materials, Bryce Skies, models, D&D items, stories.
Tutorials on Poser imports to Vue/Bryce, Postwork, Vue rendering/lighting, etc etc!


Trepz posted Sun, 03 February 2008 at 10:48 AM

It is indeed all up to the viewer.I for one have been here for almost 7 years and have seen the level of quality wane in some galleries,but i personally believe that the more we learn,and the better we get the more we have the ablility to percieve whats good and what isn't.I remember a time when i thought Poser art was the best thing in the world..in fact exactly what got me into digital art is the desire to learn how to make digital eyes..you know with the wetness and reflection ect.It absolutly amazed me.Now that it is old hat and a basic skill for ME I think it is rather trite,but i assure you there is someone out there right now putting out garbage that many people who arent "in the know" think is just fantastic.And it will always be this way.

Compared to a few years ago personally i think the quality of the Vue gallery has improved in the past year,but so has the software,as it is all getting closer to that magic "make art" button it makes it easier...It is still apparent who is just starting out,but the beginner quality has improved over all i feel.

"Many are willing to suffer for their art. Few are willing to learn to draw."


dburdick posted Sun, 03 February 2008 at 12:20 PM

There is a great a diverse group of artists all across Renderosity, and particularly, within the Vue gallery.  I think the art work has improved quite a bit in general within the Vue gallery over the years.  People are now rendering some great atmospheric stuff that you would never see two years ago.  And with all the great plants and veg from people like Linda and others, there is a much richer diversity of nature type renderings.  I think the character/poser stuff has also improved quite a bit.  So I would have to respectfully disagree with the opening premise.


thundering1 posted Sun, 03 February 2008 at 2:39 PM

T&A will always rule the ratings - sad fact of life. So in the "most viewed" section there is BOUND to be a high number of images most of us would scratch our heads and go, "huh...?" And it's funny to read their responses in some threads - they are completely cognoscente of the fact that it's not a great image - they simply made it to get the highest number of "views" as possible. THIS was their goal - how many people can they get to LOOK at it when they KNOW it's a POS.

And yes, there are a ton of products used by what seems almost EVERYONE - while I LOVE the look of Stonemason's green dingy basemen machinery scenery (name anyone? - I'm blanking) how often do you see it every week?

I've only been here a few years, and even I have changed my opinions in that short amount of time - stuff I used to think was awesome is now pretty basic - comes with knowing more and more how to do it.

"Make Art Button" - that has always given me a giggle ;-)

There's a number of gifted artists here - yes, most may not be trained professionals - just hobbyists with a good sense of concepts and getting better and better at seeing them through. Since (like mentioned above) the galleries have a non-stop endless streaming-in of content a lot of them get knocked off of the 1st page making them harder to find, but they're there.

What I've found helpful to do is go to an artist's page you like, and look through THEIR favorites list - I've found a number of gems that way!

Sorry you're frustrated, but I'll be sticking around - still got plenty for me to see here.
-Lew ;-)


ShawnDriscoll posted Sun, 03 February 2008 at 5:49 PM

Quote - You may or may not agree with my view on this thread but as I browse the images I'm a bit disappointed at the quality of work  I view these days? Are people just getting lazy and not  taking pride in there work?

Quantity rather than quality is becoming more of the trend here.  That and more users without artist training are starting to use 3D apps.

www.youtube.com/user/ShawnDriscollCG


Tablesaw posted Sun, 03 February 2008 at 5:50 PM

Yes it is my opinion silverblade 33, but the only undesirable person I see is the one with a foolish grin wearing a skirt. You are not an artist so listening to you spout off means nothing to me.


ShawnDriscoll posted Sun, 03 February 2008 at 5:52 PM

Quote - What I don't get is why people feel so obligated to comment back on other images even when those images are not that interesting in the first place? Yet you read stuff like amazing, genius, awesome, fantastic...I sit here scratching my head many times asking...Am I not seeing it?

No one these days wants to hurt anyone's self-esteem for fear of getting sued.

www.youtube.com/user/ShawnDriscollCG


keenart posted Sun, 03 February 2008 at 6:16 PM

Tablesaw, your approach certainly is one way to get your work recognized.  It still does not make one a better artist than the rest, just clever.

jankeen.com


ShawnDriscoll posted Sun, 03 February 2008 at 6:57 PM

It would be nice if uploaded images that used content rather than original models would go into a gallery section called Content.  Then I could skip that gallery entirely and find better artwork to browse through.

www.youtube.com/user/ShawnDriscollCG


FrankT posted Sun, 03 February 2008 at 7:06 PM

Just avoiding the Poser, DAZ Studio and Vue galleries should stop most of them I'd have thought

My Freebies
Buy stuff on RedBubble


ShawnDriscoll posted Sun, 03 February 2008 at 7:06 PM

Quote - As a professional, you do not have to "get excited to get creative.

I wish I had a $ everytime someone told me they were a professional and it turned out they were not and they still got paid for just showing up.

www.youtube.com/user/ShawnDriscollCG


ShawnDriscoll posted Sun, 03 February 2008 at 7:10 PM

Quote - There is a great a diverse group of artists here...

And non-artists.

www.youtube.com/user/ShawnDriscollCG


Tablesaw posted Sun, 03 February 2008 at 7:22 PM

Keenart...I have been a painter in my country since I was a teen and my love of art began before I even entered school. I am not better, I see many that have talent far more superior to mine and I don't hate them for that as I don't hate the people here that enjoy creating images for whatever reason. I don't need an approach to be recognized here...As this place is only a hobby for me and not an income. I enjoy people downloading my models without a cost to them and I haven't  a desire to profit from them. Sorry but there are lousy cops, lousy doctors and there are lousy artists. Christ...The day I'm afraid to speak my mind is the day Poser gives their software away free of charge.


Trepz posted Sun, 03 February 2008 at 8:39 PM

Attached Link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Art

Well,this article leaves most of us out anyway..so i guess we all suck:D

"Many are willing to suffer for their art. Few are willing to learn to draw."


ShawnDriscoll posted Sun, 03 February 2008 at 8:51 PM

Don't believe what's posted on wiki.

www.youtube.com/user/ShawnDriscollCG


Trepz posted Sun, 03 February 2008 at 8:58 PM

It was mostly sarcasm.I think this conversation has gone from interesting to pretty damn useless,in the flash of an eye(; It can only go so far till someone starts to argue about it...

"Many are willing to suffer for their art. Few are willing to learn to draw."


ShawnDriscoll posted Sun, 03 February 2008 at 9:33 PM

This topic never ends well whenever it starts on Renderosity.  Reality hurts a lot of people's feelings.

www.youtube.com/user/ShawnDriscollCG


silverblade33 posted Sun, 03 February 2008 at 9:48 PM

Quote - Yes it is my opinion silverblade 33, but the only undesirable person I see is the one with a foolish grin wearing a skirt. You are not an artist so listening to you spout off means nothing to me.

Thought as much.... :tt2:
Again: witth age and experience, comes a higher standard and expectation.  Quite normal, but not when taken to extremes or to snobbery.

Go read back on what you have written, how you came over form the start with vinegar...that's what wrankled with me, as it resembled a nasty diatribe from a poltroon a while back.

Now, as for myself, i simply don't have the TIME to spend weeks or months on each piece (except a model). my clock is ticking, I've too much to learn, too many stories ot be told and too little time. I like telling a story with what I make, while I can.

"Art" does not belong to YOU. Jeesh. Thank God (or whatever you believe in) for having your talent, enjoy it, but chill for goodness sake. 

Read what you have psoted, then imagine someone speaking to you like that.  You didn't come here for a debate, you came with an itchy keyboard finger and vim.
.303 Bookworms fly from Tablesaw's fingers :p

Why not debate it more calmly and logically, while also realizing that art is a deeply subjective thing? :) Like politics or religion, you can never be "right" except about hard facts, as your preferences are entirely personal: it works for YOU.

Shonner,

Quote - This topic never ends well whenever it starts on Renderosity.  Reality hurts a lot of people's feelings.

Agreed!
Well, "reality" hurts all of us, and I don't know about you, but art's one of my escapes from "Reality's" woes ;)
Rather talk useful things about art: how to's etc, or humorus, positive things, than this.

So...on the original topic:

I think that sums it up nicely? :)

"I'd rather be a Fool who believes in Dragons, Than a King who believes in Nothing!" www.silverblades-suitcase.com
Free tutorials, Vue & Bryce materials, Bryce Skies, models, D&D items, stories.
Tutorials on Poser imports to Vue/Bryce, Postwork, Vue rendering/lighting, etc etc!


Tablesaw posted Sun, 03 February 2008 at 10:06 PM

Holy F_ _ _ Yes reality does hurt!...And for those who can't stand for it should find solace in their mothers bosoms. This thread has become lame and if there was a delete I'd click on it.


Tablesaw posted Sun, 03 February 2008 at 10:19 PM

Listen pal...six months ago I had heart surgery and a cardiologist looked me in the eye and said I may not make it but I'm here and made it because I have guts and fearlessness. I don't whine about any of it or do I display it on my web page for all to see. You have to much time on your hands for someone who hasn't a lot of time.


replicand posted Sun, 03 February 2008 at 10:26 PM

 I was a musician for many years before I turned to visual art. My thing was "independent" artists - I believe that some great stuff goes unheard underneath the RADAR because it has no corporate backing - said another way, the corporate stuff wasn't worth my time because it was too formula, lacking passion and predictable. I came across a lot of crap (the journey's more important than the destination), but when I found that one gem in a thousand, I'd ask myself "why aren't more people into this?"

My whole reason for writing music was "what happens when I modulate x with y but invert it with q after running it through a theta filter". I think that's the difference between an artist and a hobbyist - the artist isn't looking for personal praise but have dedicated their lives to the studious pursuit of their craft, looking to push the envelope and really move peoples emotions, perhaps get them to see the world in a different way. Though it is not a lifestyle for everyone, I have no TV or significant other because I am married to my muse, and she is one jealous and demanding b*tch, whom I could not live without, or would want to compromise with distractions.

On the flip side, many so-called hobbyists will become great (though I believe it takes lots of study and experimentation - perhaps the lack of that is what the original poster is lamenting; there are far too many pin-ups with blank stares, pouty lips and small noses in the gallery), but before one can be great, or even good, they're gonna put out crap (speaking from experience). I love the crap that I put out, but that doesn't mean that I'm content to rest upon it. I want more.

Finally, it's funny that people are so "butt-hurt" by constructive criticism. Critics can be your best allies, if one takes their comments in stride. Art is subjective, but an artist must look at his / her work as objectively as possible. That, I believe, is in short supply in some of the larger galleries.


CobraEye posted Sun, 03 February 2008 at 10:30 PM

 I think everything is art to some degree because humans can be moved by anything.  Just a painting that is the color red speaks to the viewer if the viewer is opened to it.  At 1st I didn't understand it, but I see art in everything because everything speaks to me.

I did notice the art here does not speak to me as much as it did, but lately I've been enjoying  the fractal art.  

Does any of this make good sense?


replicand posted Sun, 03 February 2008 at 10:40 PM

Quote -  I think everything is art to some degree because humans can be moved by anything.....
 Does any of this make good sense?

Yes.

I like music that is not sung in English. I live within spitting distance of Mexico, so when I get bored I scan through radio stations until I hear something that catches my attention, which is usually  tuba mixed with accordian. I was listening to a song today that sounded like the opening credits to the 1956 version of Godzilla, if that movie was produced in Mexico instead of Japan. It was horribly awesome.

One must be open to influences wherever they come from.


keenart posted Sun, 03 February 2008 at 10:43 PM

If you really love your art no one can offend you with a comment.

 

Tablesaw;

 

I am glad to here you are just an ordinary person like all of the rest of us.   Whether a hobbyist or an artist your work speaks for itself.

 

Shonner;

 

How could you separate the content from 3D, since almost all of the materials the software contains we use or modify are in some way part of the original content?  

jankeen.com


Tablesaw posted Sun, 03 February 2008 at 10:50 PM

Cobra Eye...Do you know how many artists prey on people like you? I have a friend...maybe not so much a friend these days who makes a decent living putting out his trash. His philosophy is if I can talk you into purchasing a few red squares then we'll gladly call it art.


CobraEye posted Sun, 03 February 2008 at 11:19 PM

 I love it when I find a song sung in another language that I have never heard before yet can feel the emotional waves without knowing the meaning of the words.  

The heart of art is emotion.  The more honest the emotion the more moving.

There are many things that make art great, but honest emotion is special for me.

Tablesaw you seemed to have missed my point and I can easily see yours, so what else is there...

Good luck with all that.


ShawnDriscoll posted Sun, 03 February 2008 at 11:22 PM

Quote - Shonner;  

How could you separate the content from 3D, since almost all of the materials the software contains we use or modify are in some way part of the original content?

This site isn't programmed to do that.  But if it was, then I could hide the Content gallery while I browse new uploads.  It would be nice to see 18 thumbnails on my screen of original 3D (and 2D) artwork instead of page after page of nothing but quickly posed, positioned, somewhat lit, and then poorly rendered freebies and/or bought content.

www.youtube.com/user/ShawnDriscollCG


keenart posted Sun, 03 February 2008 at 11:58 PM

I get it and that would be much quicker.  Where is the suggestion box?

jankeen.com


Paloth posted Mon, 04 February 2008 at 12:53 AM

Generally, the best you can hope for in a Renderocity gallery are elements of originality garnished with preexisting content. Very few Vue artists populate their scene with homemade solidgrowth, for example. Most of what you see contains nothing original except perhaps the composition and combination. It is akin to collage or flower arrangement.

Download my free stuff here: http://www.renderosity.com/homepage.php?page=2&userid=323368


Trepz posted Mon, 04 February 2008 at 1:24 AM

As far as origionality goes EVERYTHING has been done already.We live on one planet.We can only do and see so much in a lifetime.It is up to you to decide what you like and what you do not.

"Many are willing to suffer for their art. Few are willing to learn to draw."


Paloth posted Mon, 04 February 2008 at 1:34 AM

I should clarify that by "original" I mean a likeness actually created by the artist rather than loaded from stock content.

Download my free stuff here: http://www.renderosity.com/homepage.php?page=2&userid=323368


Trepz posted Mon, 04 February 2008 at 2:00 AM

OH!!! you mean 98% of the Poser gallery:D And 25% of mine:p

"Many are willing to suffer for their art. Few are willing to learn to draw."


keenart posted Mon, 04 February 2008 at 5:36 AM

It is the same on the Gallery circuit, they want consistency; the same thing over and over again.  They are not interested in new and your fans (buyers) are pretty much the same, they want what the Gallery wants you to paint, or if fortunate you do best. 

So, as you say, if you are good at painting scenes of cars, how many ways can you pose a corvette?  We lost the print market because it had all been done after 20 years and investors inflated the prices of prints until few could afford to buy.  Now it is Kincaid, which is also finally beginning to wane.  

Art and peoples tastes are cyclic, as a professional you ride the economic demand or you perish.  Art is all business now and nothing will change that.  

jankeen.com


Trepz posted Mon, 04 February 2008 at 7:48 AM

Yep.Royo Valejo,Barber ect.same same same...But DAMN fine art pieces every one of them. If it aint broke dont fix it(;

"Many are willing to suffer for their art. Few are willing to learn to draw."


Rutra posted Mon, 04 February 2008 at 9:59 AM

Quote Paloth:

"Generally, the best you can hope for in a Renderocity gallery are elements of originality garnished with preexisting content. Very few Vue artists populate their scene with homemade solidgrowth, for example.
Most of what you see contains nothing original except perhaps the composition and combination. It is akin to collage or flower arrangement."

In my humble opinion, this statement overrates the value of a homemade mesh or object, in what concerns the creation of art, and underrates the combination and composition elements.

I would say originality and art are not about object creation. Personally, I could more easily call art to a scene that transmits an original idea using only stock content, than a common still life image full of normal objects whose meshes were laboriously and profissionally made by someone. Art is not technique and vice-versa. Personally, I've seen flower arrangements that I would more readily call art than a flower that someone created in some 3D tool.

In my humble opinion, originality lies not in an object, it lies in what ideas and emotions you transmit with it. And, for that, combination and composition are key elements.

 


thundering1 posted Mon, 04 February 2008 at 10:22 AM

Rendo is a site for "fun". People DO use it as their mode of viewing their portfolio, but for the most part, this is for fun.

There are both "less" and "more" experienced creators on the site. And no matter how subjective your eye, no one can argue the statement that there are both "better" and "worse" creations in the galleries - comes with the territory of being a site specifically as an outlet open to anyone of any level of experience or ability.

A site like, say, CGTalk is for more experienced folk who are more discerning, and their entire goal is to GET BETTER while presenting what they can do at the moment.

Do some crap images slip by the CGTalk folks? Yeah, but not much because of the atmosphere there - when you put an image up on THAT site you know it's being viewed by VERY experienced people in their fields - so you are more likely to spend much more time on concept and execution because you don't want to look like the kid with his pencil drawing of stick-figures to them.

I'm somewhere in between as far as my expectations in the gallery - there IS a marketplace for a good reason - people are MEANT to buy and USE the products (you'll note, CGTalk has NO marketplace like this - you are expected to MAKE all your assets). I EXPECT to see the products used, but there is something else I WANT to see...

The more experienced you become, the more YOU should be creating as far as assets and clothing and such. The concepts, compositions, and execution of ideas should become BETTER with experience.

While I expect someone to grow as a creator, there is NO denying that this site is mainly an outlet for "fun". Therefore, I can't gripe TOO much because some folks just want to tinker in some fun software when they get home at night, and have a moment to themselves to not think about work.


silverblade33 posted Mon, 04 February 2008 at 12:22 PM

Quote - In my humble opinion, this statement overrates the value of a homemade mesh or object, in what concerns the creation of art, and underrates the combination and composition elements.

I would say originality and art are not about object creation. Personally, I could more easily call art to a scene that transmits an original idea using only stock content, than a common still life image full of normal objects whose meshes were laboriously and profissionally made by someone. Art is not technique and vice-versa. Personally, I've seen flower arrangements that I would more readily call art than a flower that someone created in some 3D tool.

In my humble opinion, originality lies not in an object, it lies in what ideas and emotions you transmit with it. And, for that, combination and composition are key elements.

 

Well said! :)
Sea shells, oil paint, or meshes, don't matter what the heck you use, it's what you DO with it, that counts.

If somoene despises a kid's cartoon because it's "rubbish that's not even art", they kind of miss the whole damned point.

I'll take Rolf Harris over a po-faced misanthrope, any day of the week ;)

"I'd rather be a Fool who believes in Dragons, Than a King who believes in Nothing!" www.silverblades-suitcase.com
Free tutorials, Vue & Bryce materials, Bryce Skies, models, D&D items, stories.
Tutorials on Poser imports to Vue/Bryce, Postwork, Vue rendering/lighting, etc etc!


craftycurate posted Mon, 04 February 2008 at 4:48 PM

I love the comments I get which are well thought through, constructive and insightful. The ones which say "that's great, but you could improve it by doing X Y and Z" - bring it on!

I'm also tired of the dull Poser images, and images which are little more than a selection of library objects dragged into a scene which is poorly lit and composed.

But a lot of what goes on, IMHO, is just emotional "stroking" and is far removed from quality artwork or the kind of constructive critical feedback that leads to the sharpening of creative gifts.

BUT there is some awesome stuff on here and loads of genuine talent and creative artistry and so I'm prepared to dig a bit to find it. Also I've bumped into some kindred spirits on here who have a similar passion to me - to really stretch my software to its limits and get the best out of it, to enjoy creating technically complex images that stretch our skill and artistic experience, so I'll stick around a bit longer.


Tablesaw posted Mon, 04 February 2008 at 10:20 PM

Reading your bio silverblade I kinda understand now why you go off on anyone who doesn't  fill your need to be cheery. Living under a constant cloud in the depths of depression  would probably make me act like a jerk !  You're just another slant on the neighborhood bully  Scotty.

You are right craftycurate in saying there are dull Poser images... As you are right in saying there are many that are awesome.


keenart posted Mon, 04 February 2008 at 11:20 PM

OH! I like Boris to, but Frank is still may all time favorite.  I did not know until a couple of years ago that the dark haired babe he painted in all of his works was his wife!  She is just as good looking in real life!

 

Depression does not make you a bully, it tears at the fabric of your mind, enslaves your consciousness in a pit of fear and cloaks you in an overwhelming state of senselessness.   A darkness that not even the most fearless can tolerate.

 

Tablesaw, this is not an illness to joke about, being dehumanized by such an illness can only be understood by those who suffer from this devastating illness. 

jankeen.com


Trepz posted Tue, 05 February 2008 at 12:14 AM

I have had Manic Depresssion with a dash of paranoid psychosis since the age of 12. Its like opening a box of chocolates every morning.theres only so much valium and clonapin one can eat...Gotta go out have a drink,put down the donuts and say F*&% IT once in a while...

"Many are willing to suffer for their art. Few are willing to learn to draw."


Tablesaw posted Tue, 05 February 2008 at 12:20 AM

Keenart...silverblade attacked me because I asked a simple question about the quality of images I've been viewing. He decided I was ignorant, crass, and whatever else he thought he could get away with saying. I don't like being called these things and all he did was put my back up against the wall. The bully comment had nothing to do with his state of health it was just a sentence after another.


silverblade33 posted Tue, 05 February 2008 at 12:22 AM

Tablesaw,
Look in the mirror before you start throwing those accusations. I'm not the one hunting through another person's website for items to harass and abuse them with.
That "skirt" is a "kilt". For someone to not know what that is, or to be so full of themselves as to insult it, knowing what it is...sigh.  

I ponder what skeletons you hide in the closet, that makes you act so?
Other posters are remarkably mature and calm, makes a nice change to  much of the rest of the world :)

I'm annoyed by your arrogant hubris, you are not here to debate, or amuse, or share. But since I'm an adult, I'd rather return fire with insight and humour, since there's more than just you and me here on this board.

Quote -
Listen pal...six months ago I had heart surgery and a cardiologist looked me in the eye and said I may not make it but I'm here and made it because I have guts and fearlessness.

"Guts" and "fearlessness" have nothing to do with surviving heart surgery. They help, but they don't make you survive it, medical studies even show that, fyi, at least with cancer.
You are alive because of Fate and damned good physicians, and THOSE are the folk you should be praising, not your own self.

Now, if you have managed to cope with severe pain, disablity, depression etc, then i'd be impressed.
Dying is easy, living is hard.

And I've seen a bit of what's on the Other Side, you obviosuly have not, or you would have lost your arrogance and thanked God or Whomever, for just being granted the privilege to see any art again.

Now, maybe I've picked you up wrong, maybe you are indeed a nice man, but your tone of writing is NOT that of a friendly, congenial, or enlightened person. Always hard to tell with the lack inflection of pure text, but your words by your 5th post in this thread suggested you were indeed "undesirable". Go back and read it. Plain out right insult to the poster referenced.

Quote -
I have not seen your art, but I doubt you have spent your life around  great artists as you say I have not. I won't get into quoting other artists from our past, as what was written in their behalf was not in their own handwritings. You are the same school of thought that believes a diploma is equivalent  to talent and any artist worth their salt knows long before they reach the so called  professional arena you speak of that what they pull from within does not come easily. You seem to speak of masterpieces as if they plop from ones butt, not so... As you can fill one large bookshelf with all the memorable works created by the most talented (not experienced) artists of our times.

Since this board doesn't have an "ignore" function, i dealt with you in a "Bugs Bunny vs Yosemite Sam" fashion. Much more fun for everyone ;)

Now,have I picked you up wrongly?  If so, I apologise, but t least I tried ot keep it funny.

 
Keenart,
no kidding, mate :/

"I'd rather be a Fool who believes in Dragons, Than a King who believes in Nothing!" www.silverblades-suitcase.com
Free tutorials, Vue & Bryce materials, Bryce Skies, models, D&D items, stories.
Tutorials on Poser imports to Vue/Bryce, Postwork, Vue rendering/lighting, etc etc!


ShawnDriscoll posted Tue, 05 February 2008 at 12:53 AM

Funny?  You're posts aren't funny.  Please stay on topic.

www.youtube.com/user/ShawnDriscollCG


Tablesaw posted Tue, 05 February 2008 at 12:54 AM

A bit about myself...Yes I am hard, maybe to hard for my own good but that comes from spending many years on the streets of a big city. I don't think I have a single unbroken bone in my hands or scars from the life and death situations I put myself in. I could write a book on what I have seen and been a part of but most of you here would only put the blame entirely on these broad shoulders. I'm now older and very tame if thats possible for me, but my art is and has always been my salvation. Its hard to leave old habits behind  but I f *#@% try!


silverblade33 posted Tue, 05 February 2008 at 1:07 AM

Tablesaw,
peace? :)

"I'd rather be a Fool who believes in Dragons, Than a King who believes in Nothing!" www.silverblades-suitcase.com
Free tutorials, Vue & Bryce materials, Bryce Skies, models, D&D items, stories.
Tutorials on Poser imports to Vue/Bryce, Postwork, Vue rendering/lighting, etc etc!


keenart posted Tue, 05 February 2008 at 4:55 AM

So, Tablesaw, you have the floor, now what would you change to make Rend a better place?

jankeen.com


Monsoon posted Tue, 05 February 2008 at 7:18 AM

This reply is not a response to what is art and what is not, or who's an artist and who isn't.  In my opinion, those topics are so subjective as to render argument on them moot. It simply does not matter....here or anywhere else.

These galleries are not the same as the Metro downtown or the Albright Knox, wherin finished, mounted and saleable pieces are displayed for layman, agent and critic alike. Nor are they like the studios which pump out art 'professionally'  for multitudes of clients. In my opinion, these galleries are simply a showcase for the 'user', be they hobbyist, beginner, veteran or professional to share their 'progress' in this particular art form and with this, or another particular tool. There are plenty of pieces here that would translate easily into the highbrow analog gallery and just as many that would better remain in the sketchbook.

I, myself, am a professional in both art and music, if, by professional one means that I make money at it. I certainly do. Yet most of my work in these galleries are not 'finished' saleable pieces. They are simply illustrations of where I'm at and what I'm working on these days. I think the same is true of many of us. There are far more 'finished' artists here than I am for sure.

I don't comment much in the galleries if ever. That doesn't mean I don't view the works or participate. I simply avoid the commentary bog. I prefer to email a colleague or discuss technique in the forums. And as such, I'd like to take this opportunity to mention what I see going on in the gallery and which particulars float my boat.

I admire the fortitude it takes to work with a tool that is both wondrous and frustrating, quirky and unpredictable...sometimes working, sometimes not. I like it when a tool is bent to the artistic will and I see that a lot in the Vue galleries.

I like the work being done on different ways to do a thing...the emulation of Terragen, the use of Python for skin shaders and such and the marvelous array of new vegetation.  I am not good at Vue atmospheres or plants so I am thrilled when new awesome ones are created by the community.

I too, grow weary of the gratuitous Poser babe that's planted top heavy in the middle of a camera view....but I love it when an unusual lighting is added or an innovative costume that was modelled in Hexagon or an unexpected backdrop.

I am thoroughly enjoying the military and nautical scenes that are currently prevelant.

I love the sci fi/ fantasy scenes...especially the ones based on storyline and literature.

I like the experiments in lighting going on and as a lighting noob, I find viewing them valuable in my own efforts to learn.

I am very fond of the mixture of Vue and 2d...especially Vue and Painter.

I am excited about the tools to model within Vue. Again, different ways of doing things.

I like the works wherein styles of the Old World masters are emulated.

I like the stuff where the composition itself is the main subject....

I could go on but I gotta go to the day job. At any rate, this is all simply my opinion but one which I hope is well taken.

Live long and render...

M


wabe posted Tue, 05 February 2008 at 8:20 AM

I agree totally to what monsoon said, I have very similar thoughts.

Only one addition to threads like this. The problem with those is that they ask people that are (still) active in a forum and thereofre implies that their work is not as good as it was in "the good old days". So that there are a bit heavier reactions than it needs is natural in my eyes.

Tablesaw, therefore when you miss some of the old masters, you must find a way to ask them about why they do not post here (or somewhere else) anymore. And not tell the active ones that they are not as good as the old ones. Tricky I know but it avoids hard feelings.

One day your ship comes in - but you're at the airport.


Trepz posted Tue, 05 February 2008 at 9:38 AM

the majority of the reason i have found (and i have to agree) that people stop posting here is the "popularity" click that goes on around here,and the lack of HONESTY in comments.Simply because you are a "friend" of that person you feel it respectful to tell them there art is above what it really is or whatever.No one can deny that it does happen here,nor can they deny that are not guilty of it themselves.Since i myself have become a vendor over at C3D my comments here have tripled.I know my art isnt any better,it is just the way it is around here.I average 20-30 comments here,where over at C3D i get maybe 5-6.Thats just how it is. most people do not like this type of behavior so they move on.I know quite a few that have left here because they feel there not getting honest feedback.Who can blame them. Some people cannot handle criticism,and you get shit letters in your inbox next day,so it is best to not say anything at all.I feeel there should be no other option to have or not have criticism.If you put your work out there it becomes public domain and therefore open to scrutiny.

"Many are willing to suffer for their art. Few are willing to learn to draw."


silverblade33 posted Tue, 05 February 2008 at 10:32 AM

Well, there's certainly new and superb art out there..
http://www.renderosity.com/mod/gallery/index.php?image_id=1606864
Calum5's work is awesome, found it purely by accident.

The sheer volume of work here makes it hard to cope with at times.

Monsoon,
aye, lot of the Poser art is superbly well done, much better than I can do, but often, I see a superb item, ruined because the character has no expression! You're fighting monsters, posing seductively etc and....characters are in neutral. Terrible waste :(

"I'd rather be a Fool who believes in Dragons, Than a King who believes in Nothing!" www.silverblades-suitcase.com
Free tutorials, Vue & Bryce materials, Bryce Skies, models, D&D items, stories.
Tutorials on Poser imports to Vue/Bryce, Postwork, Vue rendering/lighting, etc etc!


Trepz posted Tue, 05 February 2008 at 10:51 AM

But man you gotta agree that when you see a popular vendors stuff in the galleries OVER AND OVER AND OVER it is overkill.Buying prefab poses/props/textures slapping it together and calling it art is a buncha crap!!! not unlike playing prefab campaigns in a D&D world.I havent played in years,but i to was a dungeon crawler.It is essentially the same really.Wheres the fun in that? I got so mad sometimes that i really wanted to PM them folks and flame the shit out of them,but it is best to just not open that gallery at all...and keep the piece.To quote some idiot a few years back "Cant we all just get along" And the answer is NO WE CANNOT,not as long as people like us feud over the same things...

"Many are willing to suffer for their art. Few are willing to learn to draw."


AboranTouristCouncil posted Tue, 05 February 2008 at 11:31 AM

    Let me preface by saying that I'm not a great artist, what I do, I do to entertain myself. If others like it, great.  (My art is a hobby that my wife puts up with as it keeps me out of the bars.)
I have no formal training, and everything I've done has been trail and error. I look at pictures I like, then try to figure it out WHY I like it. I stumble along, learning as I go.
     As my background is in Autocad, I don't have the time or skill to learn how to make things myself, other than the simple boolean operations Vue offers. (I'm trying to learn sketch-up now) I can use Photoshop to some degree, but am not a wizard with it.
    Being one that uses the prefab stuff, I have to agree that it can be overdone and overdone very badly. In my defense (and some others that DO use the prefab stuff) I try to find different ways of using what I have, whether by retexturing, cutting parts off of props, etc.
    In essence, I try to make mine.
    Its not the tools one uses, but how they use it. 
    And I agree with Silverblade33 that the expression is probably the most important aspect of the render. Without the expression, then its just a mannequin in a store front window. I'll spend hours trying to capture the expression I'm looking for. Sometimes its the expression that becomes the image.
    (Note: If you're not into big breasted women in the central pose, don't waste your time with the links- does this qualify as a shameless plug?)
     Renderosity, at least to me, is a place to see both the accomplished artist, and the novice. Its a giant gallery in which to showcase ones work. There are seperate wings, dedicated to the particular program that was used to create that art. A lot overlaps, but everyone favors one or several. But unlike a real life gallery, the foyer is continually changing, every few seconds as new art makes its way in. Some of it is good, a few spectacular and quite a bit is what you would expect from people just starting to learn how to use the tools they have. We all wish we had the skill and the eye of the masters, would love to see our stuff with the thousands of feedbacks. But not all of us can be Vallejo, Frazzeta, Parrish, Rembrandt, (---insert favorite artist here---)
     Renderosity is the giant refrigerator that everyone puts their art on, whether from Pre-k to Grand Master
     So no, getting back to Tablesaw's original statement, I don't think we're losing the grandmasters, we're just seeing more and more of those who are either starting out (like me) or those progressing. We have the tools, and we have the will, and we are very dangerous to the eyes and senses!

...Insert some witty or thought provoking comment here...


Paula Sanders posted Tue, 05 February 2008 at 11:47 AM

I have been following this thread and vowed I wasn't going to get involved, but I'd like to comment from Monsoon through Wabe and Trepz's latter posts. Anything after his last post I have not seen so it is not included in this commentary.

First let me state that I agree with Monsoon and others who have said this. This should be a LEARNING environment. Personally, the  pictures I find objectionable are when Poser people are stuck in the middle of the screen without much work done on them especially half clad to titilate. I'm not against nudity in art. I have a nude gallery. What I don't like is lowering nudity as an art form so it verges on porn. Yes, I know we could have a whole discussion on what is porn, but I think the people who produce pictures to titulate others know what I am talking about..

I, also, object to bashing of other people. There is no place in a forum for this. Let's stick to ideas and grow with and from them.

I used to put up work in my Rendo gallery. I don't bother any more. I got tired of some of the comments so I put them all in a Vue gallery on my website. I consider myself an artist. I have worked in the field professionally on and off since my early twenties. I have shown my photographs in galleries in NYC and sold prints all over the world. So if this makes me a professional in some eyes, hurray. To me the definition of a professional artists does not need to revolve around selling of their work. Some people who call themselves artists sell like crazy and their work is just churned out crap. I am not speaking about work to sell and work for oneself. I know that often to sell, certain types of work need to be produced, but in one's spare time, one works differently. That is not what I am addressing.

 If don't work on an image, a little of me feels like it is dying. I feel unfulfilled. I need to do art work. I have studied hard and long and taught various forms of art. I do not believe to be a professional one has to go to art school, but one must study and learn. I have taught subjects from Kindergarten to College Level. The love of learning has always been a point I have stressed as well as creativity regardless of the field. I started teaching in the slums of NYC and have also been subject to "hard knocks" as well as debilitating migraine headaches. It either makes one stronger or breaks one.

If comments were actually constructive, I'd put my work up again, but I have felt why bother, one can go to my gallery and e-mail me or IM me if they want.

Anyway, enough. Let's be constructive here and grow. If somebody says they don't feel that the art work is as good as it used to be, that is a valid point if the point was made to start a good discussion on why or not why  this is the case and what is the purpose of this forum. Let's just not get personal and let's use this forum as a GROWTH tool.  I am not pointing any fingers. I am speaking in general as regards this thread as well as others.


agiel posted Tue, 05 February 2008 at 4:42 PM

My apologies in advance for the disruption of this thread.

I am closing it down temporarily to give me time to review it and decide what to do about it.

I saw the original post had a deleted comment, which made it look like the original post was canceled. I lost track of the thread since and didn't get ebots about new posts.

Threads like this one have rarely turned into a positive direction.

It is the age old debate between different definition of Art, between those who expect only quality work and members with different experience, motivation, time.... the beauty of the current democratization of 3D software is that these tools are really accessible for anyone to express themselves.

There are other more elitist sites out there if you are only interested in reviewed and curated work, whatever that means.