johnfields opened this issue on Mar 03, 2008 · 8 posts
johnfields posted Mon, 03 March 2008 at 11:42 AM
I'm trying to spiff up my avatar- tought do with only 100 ppi! what do you think of the new one?
Acadia posted Mon, 03 March 2008 at 12:06 PM
It's not too bad. I'm not partial to the lettering in it. It seems to over power the small image and the figure in the middle gets lost. Now if that is what you were going for, it's bang on!
"It is good to see ourselves as
others see us. Try as we may, we are never
able to know ourselves fully as we
are, especially the evil side of us.
This we can do only if we are not
angry with our critics but will take in good
heart whatever they might have to
say." - Ghandi
nyguy posted Mon, 03 March 2008 at 12:08 PM
I agree with Acadia. For the size of the Avatar, best loose the words.
Poserverse The New Home
for NYGUY's Freebies
Jumpstartme2 posted Mon, 03 March 2008 at 3:04 PM
I agree about the lettering..and um, if the gal isn't dressed, you'll have to put some clothes on her. 
~Jani
Renderosity Community Admin
---------------------------------------
johnfields posted Tue, 04 March 2008 at 12:50 AM
Quote - I agree about the lettering..and um, if the gal isn't dressed, you'll have to put some clothes on her.
She's chrome no pubic hair or nipples...
nyguy posted Tue, 04 March 2008 at 8:14 AM
Quote - > Quote - I agree about the lettering..and um, if the gal isn't dressed, you'll have to put some clothes on her.
She's chrome no pubic hair or nipples...
If you want to keep the letters loose the figure in the middle, or change the posing. I am currently working on a new avatar for all sites including my own. I was originally going to go with a Monty Python sorta like this image below, but decided too busy. So I am working on a simple animated logo.
Poserverse The New Home
for NYGUY's Freebies
Acadia posted Tue, 04 March 2008 at 8:19 AM
Quote - > Quote - I agree about the lettering..and um, if the gal isn't dressed, you'll have to put some clothes on her.
She's chrome no pubic hair or nipples...
I don't think that matters. To my knowledge only statue props that are actually modelled as statures can be nude without the nudity flag required. Texturing a figure in a statue-like texture (stone, metal) is still a figure which is nude.
"It is good to see ourselves as
others see us. Try as we may, we are never
able to know ourselves fully as we
are, especially the evil side of us.
This we can do only if we are not
angry with our critics but will take in good
heart whatever they might have to
say." - Ghandi
johnfields posted Tue, 04 March 2008 at 9:12 AM
Quote - > Quote - > Quote - I agree about the lettering..and um, if the gal isn't dressed, you'll have to put some clothes on her.
She's chrome no pubic hair or nipples...
I don't think that matters. To my knowledge only statue props that are actually modelled as statures can be nude without the nudity flag required. Texturing a figure in a statue-like texture (stone, metal) is still a figure which is nude.
Even if the naughty bits are not there? I mean a statue with a bikini seems a bit odd- so robots need to be dressed? I'm not sure I get this rule - the point of clothing is to cover the nipples and pubis but if they are not there -what's the point of covering them- this seems a tad bit prudish.