Forum: Photography


Subject: New monitor question

MGD opened this issue on Oct 09, 2008 · 11 posts


MGD posted Thu, 09 October 2008 at 9:51 AM

I got an eMail offer from TigerDirect. 

It's a 21.6" widescreen monitor (with speakers) for $149.99 -- Hanns-G HG-216DPB

Some questions ... is that a good price? 

My current desktop has only VGA ... will it work or will I be buying a doorstop? 

Any opinions on Hanns-G? 

etc. 

Thanks

--
Martin


dhama posted Thu, 09 October 2008 at 12:12 PM

How many milliseconds is the update? if it's below 7ms  then i'd say it's a good deal on paper anyway. The proof in the pudding is actually seeing the display, so if you can find it in a local computer store, check it out first.


MGD posted Thu, 09 October 2008 at 12:16 PM

The specifications include ...

Response Time: 5 ms

Is that what you meant? 

--
Martin


MGD posted Thu, 09 October 2008 at 12:23 PM

I also got an eMail offer from buy.com -- Acer Widescreen LCD monitor for $166.99 ... as that includes shipping, they are both the same price ... plus don't have to bother getting a rebate. 

Similar specs; no speakers (not a big loss, though). 

what do you think of that one ... comparison. 

--
Martin


Tanchelyn posted Thu, 09 October 2008 at 12:46 PM

See the other thread on monitors.
Both are good for gaming but can give you no idea on what colour you really see as it changes depending on the angle of vision. So for photowork they aren't good enough.

There are no Borg. All resistance is fertile.


MGD posted Thu, 09 October 2008 at 1:02 PM

you no idea on what colour you really see as it changes
depending on the angle of vision.

So for photowork they aren't good enough.

Ouch!

That just saved me from making a $160, or so mistake. 

Thanks. 

--
Martin


inshaala posted Fri, 10 October 2008 at 8:05 AM

 Yup - good advice - check the reviews of said monitor and pay attention to anything which mentions photo work and calibration... while some may be good for gaming (when the average gamer doesnt care too much about colour rendition) they might not be good for photo work.  Contrast ratio is also a good one to look at 1:800 is generally a good benchmark (pay no attention to "Dynamic" contrast btw - that is mainly for games and film watching)

"In every colour, there's the light.
In every stone sleeps a crystal.
Remember the Shaman, when he used to say:
Man is the dream of the Dolphin"

Rich Meadows Photography


MGD posted Fri, 10 October 2008 at 8:35 AM

Thanks everyone. 

I also had additional information from prixat in the hardware forum.  

--
Martin


auntietk posted Sat, 11 October 2008 at 12:46 PM

I just bought a new monitor last year.  I went to all the stores in town and LOOKED at them.  Most of the monitors on the shelf were hooked up to the inernet, so I opened my gallery on RR and looked at my own work on the monitors I was considering.  That was a really good idea, since I knew exactly what the images I was viewing were supposed to look like!  (I didn't like the Acer at ANY price, btw.  The angle of viewing was too narrow, and the colors weren't right.)  I don't know jack about specs ... for me, seeing was believing.  I love the monitor I got (A 22" Samsung SyncMaster).  It was WAY worth the time and effort.  I paid more than what you're looking at with those on-line offers, but I use it every day, and it's been worth every penny. 

"If your pictures aren't good enough, you're not close enough."  ...  Robert Capa


MGD posted Sat, 11 October 2008 at 12:54 PM

I love the monitor I got (A 22" Samsung SyncMaster).

What is the model number? 

--
Martin


JuliusS-J posted Sat, 11 October 2008 at 7:18 PM

I really like my Asus PW201, but on the Photokina i had the chance too try some postwork on an Eizo TFT (think it was the Eizo HD244W- TS). It was much better, excellent colours, brightness, view angel and last but not least it's not a cheap thing :D. But for professional work it's necessary. It depends on what you want to do with your new monitor.