My dad was a real professional photographer. No shooting 50 rolls of film of the same subject and then searching out a few keepers. He never had to take more than two shots of a subject. 99.0 percent of the time he had two perfect shots. He processed all of the B&W stuff he shot,and retouched the negatives by hand. He sent all color work out the the professional labs for processing and printing. He said that "This is not a hobby. It is too expenxive and time consuming to do it in house. I do not have time to waste playing with the stuff" He would say. "Shooting more than two shots of any subject is a cop out, it reveals little or no talent. People who do that learn little and create by accident. Someone who shoots roll after roll varying angles poses, lighting, camera settings. Is relying for the accidental shot." To him they were hack amatures. I remember him teaching me how to compose, how to really look at the subject, behind it, in front of it. to examine shadows and dozens of other subtleties. He taught me patience and not to fire the shutter until everything was right. He said that anything less was a mere snapshot. "You can get lucky and get some terrific snapshots, but why rely on luck?. To make a long story short I never followed in his footsteps and persued photography as a profession. But it does not mean that his advice fell on deaf ears. So when I hear people gripe about their images being stolen. Heck you shoot digital and someone copies it. Those are the risks you take. You shoot on film, you have the negatives and no dispute. If you are a professional you already understand this. If you are a wannabe, well .... grow up. Do something about it, don't just gripe. My father never would, but then he was a pro and knew the price of the business. My Father, he photographed, wars, presidents, rock and roll stars, celebrities, weddings, bar mitzva's, and everyday people.