Forum: Carrara


Subject: Community Picture or movie?

thomllama opened this issue on Dec 20, 2011 · 57 posts


thomllama posted Tue, 20 December 2011 at 1:12 PM

We/I did this some years ago over at 3Dcommune with carrara, it was a good time and we all got to play a little modelling something a tad different from the normal... 

Here's the Idea..  

It's cool if we all decide on something a little unusual. Like last time we decided on modeling a victorian style bathroom.. Not something you normally think of when it comes to 3D modeling right?  :tongue1:

 

anyone interested? 

 

going to try and find the original image, think I uploaded my version after we were done .... :unsure:






Hexagon, Carrara, Sculptris, and recently Sketchup. 



thomllama posted Tue, 20 December 2011 at 1:15 PM

found it.. I modeled the sink, someone else actually did the brackets under, another did the toliet, another did the TP and holder.. so on and so forth....

 

http://www.renderosity.com/mod/gallery/media/folder_65/display_640020.jpg






Hexagon, Carrara, Sculptris, and recently Sketchup. 



MarkBremmer posted Tue, 20 December 2011 at 4:37 PM

This sounds like fun!

Hmmmm, subject matter. Because of a recent moview release, how about Sherlock Holmes' study? It could contain all sorts of odds and ends.






thomllama posted Tue, 20 December 2011 at 5:23 PM

ya, that sounds interesting.... was thinking something like a laundry room/closet or corner of the basement...

 

any other Ideas?  the father fetched the better... :)






Hexagon, Carrara, Sculptris, and recently Sketchup. 



MarkBremmer posted Tue, 20 December 2011 at 5:35 PM

Corner of the basement could be really fun too.






thomllama posted Thu, 22 December 2011 at 8:00 AM

guess no one else is interested... 






Hexagon, Carrara, Sculptris, and recently Sketchup. 



Antaran posted Thu, 22 December 2011 at 9:18 AM

Well, I am interested, but I am not much of a modeler (and that's the understatemnt of the year right here). therefore I am not sure I could contribute anything worthy.

But I think the project could be fun. And I like Mark's idea of Sherlock Holmes' study. I think it could be useful for a lot of people. I could easily put together a basement corner using models already available for free here, at DAZ, ShareCG and places like Turbosquid. It would be much harder to scape together a Sherlock Holmes' study using available free models.

And I could add another twist to it :). How about a lighting challenge using the end result? :)


thomllama posted Thu, 22 December 2011 at 9:25 AM

Quote - Well, I am interested, but I am not much of a modeler (and that's the understatemnt of the year right here). therefore I am not sure I could contribute anything worthy.

But I think the project could be fun. And I like Mark's idea of Sherlock Holmes' study. I think it could be useful for a lot of people. I could easily put together a basement corner using models already available for free here, at DAZ, ShareCG and places like Turbosquid. It would be much harder to scape together a Sherlock Holmes' study using available free models.

And I could add another twist to it :). How about a lighting challenge using the end result? :)

 

well kinda the point of it is to learn to model - shade - compose..basically try something new, ask questions from the community if you need help,  bla bla bla... using pre-made stuff is cheating  ;)   

 

The study is great, though I think it may be a bit too many things and/or a tad busy to get a few people to model stuff easy.  but I'm not knocking anything.. if that's what you guys want to do.. let's do it.. 






Hexagon, Carrara, Sculptris, and recently Sketchup. 



Antaran posted Thu, 22 December 2011 at 9:40 AM

What do you mean "using pre-made stuff is cheating"?

If you mean for the modeling, then I don't think it's allowed with most things out there. Most meshes come with EULA, which don't allow distribution of models derived from the original mesh.

Well, if the whole study is too much, it can start with the desk corner perhaps?

And I'm all for learning. Always :). And speaking of which: Do you know of any resource out there, which would list some basic generic DOS and DONTS for modeling? Just a brief list of rules with short descriptions of things which need to be avoided to prevent broken meshes, or ugly corners or weird planes, or stuff like that, and how to avoid it.

I can follow tutorials for modeling, but since I don't know these basics, I tend to be completely lost on my own and often end up with something weird looking or impossible to UV map (although that's another can of worms altogether).


Kixum posted Thu, 22 December 2011 at 9:44 AM

I like the study idea.

 

When we are done, we could load the whole thing into the free stuff section and then do the lighting challenge.

-Kix


MarkBremmer posted Thu, 22 December 2011 at 9:47 AM

Indeed.






thomllama posted Thu, 22 December 2011 at 9:48 AM

Quote - Do you know of any resource out there, which would list some basic generic DOS and DONTS for modeling? Just a brief list of rules with short descriptions of things which need to be avoided to prevent broken meshes, or ugly corners or weird planes, or stuff like that, and how to avoid it.

well a good place to start is Mark's tut's linked in his footers are pretty good.. he's also got some awesome tut's on a web site.. umm errr can't remember the name. but for like $30 you get access to the site for a month.. lot of the stuff I learned was off that .. umm mark? what's the name of that site.. errrr  :unsure:






Hexagon, Carrara, Sculptris, and recently Sketchup. 



thomllama posted Thu, 22 December 2011 at 9:56 AM

Quote - I like the study idea. When we are done, we could load the whole thing into the free stuff section and then do the lighting challenge.

 

that's the general idea..  plus like Anteran is saying about not being great at modeling, you try something, if you get lost you post questions, upload what you got and let others see, fix, help.. it's all about the community working together

Quote - What do you mean "using pre-made stuff is cheating"?

 

well the point is to learn to model your own stuff, shade it, compose and light it, not just take pre made stuff and assemble a scene.  there's no "judging" what you do or how good it is.. it's the job of everyone involved to help each other out and learn off others, share ideas..  so on and so forth.. :)






Hexagon, Carrara, Sculptris, and recently Sketchup. 



thomllama posted Thu, 22 December 2011 at 10:05 AM

soo everyone seems to like the idea of a study.. so let's get a list of items to model for a start.. hopefully others will jump in..

anything else?






Hexagon, Carrara, Sculptris, and recently Sketchup. 



Antaran posted Thu, 22 December 2011 at 12:55 PM

I think the Sherlock Holmes study is impossible without a pipe and a magnifying glass. :) So I'd add those to the list, and I might actually attempt creating them. As a starting excersise.

Other items that could be useful in this project (mostly from the nik nacks category):

Also, what about walls, windows, door?

And yes, of course for this type of challenge using ready made models is cheating, but i was simply suggesting that modeling harder to find objects would be of more use to the rest of the community.


mmoir posted Fri, 23 December 2011 at 8:16 AM

Hey ,

 I think this is a great idea and I would think the Study would be cool to try. Whatever you guys decide I will model something for this.  


thomllama posted Fri, 23 December 2011 at 8:40 AM

Well, it seems we have at least a spark of interest so let's start ... everyone choose something they want to model..  Remember when modeling for something like this it's all about sharing so make it as simple or as detailed as you like, but make it easy to break down and/or modify so people can change-add-make it their own and fit in their scene and scale...

 

I think I'll start myself with a fireplace. I might even make a few diff mantles and surrounds ..?






Hexagon, Carrara, Sculptris, and recently Sketchup. 



mmoir posted Fri, 23 December 2011 at 8:49 AM

Is it okay to post a reference image , I found a nice image of Sherlock Holmes's study. This way people can pick what to model from the image.  Here is the image and  I will model his violin.  If you want me to remove this image let me know.

thomllama posted Fri, 23 December 2011 at 8:59 AM

nope, image is good.. was just thinking of finding one myself.  a few others of different studies might be cool too so we have a bit more variety and people don't get stuck on any one look.






Hexagon, Carrara, Sculptris, and recently Sketchup. 



thomllama posted Fri, 23 December 2011 at 6:25 PM

OK, holidays and all the time on this is going to be limited.. (as I'm guessing all of you will be) but I spent an hour or so getting the fireplace started.. little insperation for everyone.  still a LOT more to do but it's basically blocked out...  :)  textures are just thrown on to show the parts so far.. nothing special

 

 

 






Hexagon, Carrara, Sculptris, and recently Sketchup. 



mmoir posted Sat, 24 December 2011 at 9:13 AM

Thomllama,

  It is looking good.

  Here is my violin so far,I may change the backside of it. I know there is a bump or something on the back but maybe not quite like this .  Probably wont update this for 3 or 4 days. 

 


thomllama posted Sat, 24 December 2011 at 10:42 AM

that looks sweet Mmoir!!






Hexagon, Carrara, Sculptris, and recently Sketchup. 



Antaran posted Sun, 25 December 2011 at 9:11 PM

Happy Holidays, everyone!

I've started on the maginifying glass today. The image is attached.

Now I have a few questions:

  1. Housekeeping: Can we get a sticky thread for this? Either this one or a brand new one with a more specific title?

  2. How and where do we upload the WIP files for others to look at?

  3. Do I need to UV map this and how do I do this right?

Right now if I go into the UV map view, the thing looks scary. And I have no idea how to make any sense of it.

  1. What about scale? Right now this thing is huge. Where do I scale (assembly room? modeling room?) it and how do I do it correctly for best usability?

  2. This is a single vertex object with multiple sub-objects and shading domains. Is this the right way to do it or should I be separating all the internal objects into assembly-room objects and grouping them in the assembly room?

I am also using Carrara's smoothing. Is that a good thing to do or a bad practice? The model does look a bit different when smoothing is disabled. For example, the glass does not match the frame when smoothing is changed.

I'd like for someone here who is better experienced at modeling to take a look at the model itself and tell me what I can improve about it. Hence the question of how and where to upload it.


thomllama posted Sun, 25 December 2011 at 9:32 PM

Happy Holidays, everyone!

I've started on the maginifying glass today. The image is attached.

Now I have a few questions:

1. Housekeeping: Can we get a sticky thread for this? Either this one or a brand new one with a more specific title?

that'll be up to the big wigs

2. How and where do we upload the WIP files for others to look at?

not sure here, I could set up an community FTP for every on my site, but evryone would need to know how to use FTP..?

3. Do I need to UV map this and how do I do this right?

Right now if I go into the UV map view, the thing looks scary. And I have no idea how to make any sense of it.

someone else will have to jump in there, I'm just as lost as you basically.. that book helps a tad but I never got into it much

4. What about scale? Right now this thing is huge. Where do I scale (assembly room? modeling room?) it and how do I do it correctly for best usability?

Scale isn't that much of an issue everyone can scale it as they need

5. This is a single vertex object with multiple sub-objects and shading domains. Is this the right way to do it or should I be separating all the internal objects into assembly-room objects and grouping them in the assembly room?

I am also using Carrara's smoothing. Is that a good thing to do or a bad practice? The model does look a bit different when smoothing is disabled. For example, the glass does not match the frame when smoothing is changed.

I like to make each part seperate as it makes for easier modifications later if you want to change things. More a personal why of going about things.

 

I'd like for someone here who is better experienced at modeling to take a look at the model itself and tell me what I can improve about it. Hence the question of how and where to upload it.






Hexagon, Carrara, Sculptris, and recently Sketchup. 



thomllama posted Mon, 26 December 2011 at 8:13 AM

OK,  I set up an FTP acct over on my servers. FTP looks scarier than it really is. you will need a small FTP program (my server company recommends Filezilla or CoreFTP for windows and CyberDuck for Macs)   

once you have the program send me a PM and I'll send you location, user and Password info :biggrin: 






Hexagon, Carrara, Sculptris, and recently Sketchup. 



thomllama posted Mon, 26 December 2011 at 10:28 AM

Attached Link: Thomllama's Carrara Community Project folder

OK, I uploaded the base fireplace and these bottles I whipped up really quick.. if someone else also wants to play with the fireplace.. go to town... it's all about the fun :biggrin:

 

just follow the link above this image and control or command click on the item to download it

 






Hexagon, Carrara, Sculptris, and recently Sketchup. 



Antaran posted Mon, 26 December 2011 at 10:55 AM

I've uploaded my magnifying glass here:

http://ectrr.com/CCPWIP/Antara/

Please take a look at it and let me know what you think.

Since I personally prefer single objects (rather than groups) with easily selectable domains, I left it as a single object. But I am open to any improvement suggestions.


thomllama posted Mon, 26 December 2011 at 11:11 AM

Quote - I've uploaded my magnifying glass here:

http://ectrr.com/CCPWIP/Antara/

Please take a look at it and let me know what you think.

it's awesome... for a guy who said he couldn't model that is sweet.. probably better than anything I can do  (not that I'm really any great modeller) 

 

Quote - Since I personally prefer single objects (rather than groups) with easily selectable domains, I left it as a single object. But I am open to any improvement suggestions.

 

I kinda prefer "building" the object in the Assy Room .. ad here's why... let's say i want to change one or both the bolts/nuts to say a regular 6 point nut. In your set up it's kinda difficult, where if it was a seperate part you just delete it and build a new one. Also when applying things like smoothing as you stated before sometimes things distort out and don't fit right.  If the glass was a seperate piece you can play with hte smoothing and such to your hearts content then fit them together in the Assy Room without issue ..  But that's just a preferance and it's all about what woks for you.






Hexagon, Carrara, Sculptris, and recently Sketchup. 



Antaran posted Mon, 26 December 2011 at 11:58 AM

Small correction: I'm not a guy :). Also I've changed the folder name to Antara, which is my proper name (extra N was tacked on to make the username unique).

Thank you! But this is actually just spheres and cylinders with various parts scaled to be smaller and bigger. I have no idea how I'm going to approach the pipe yet. I have to think about that one...

I've separate the object into groupable elements. And I also discovered that doing it after a single object is created together is easier than it would have been if I had to create and assemble the object fromparts from scratch. At least for me. And it is very simple to do with selection by shading domains, so I can be doing it going forward.

I still need help with the mapping, though. So if anyone can offer suggestions, I'd greatly appreciate them.

The new file with groupable elements is uploaded to the same folder.


thomllama posted Mon, 26 December 2011 at 12:16 PM

> Quote - Small correction: I'm not a guy :). Also I've changed the folder name to Antara, which is my proper name (extra N was tacked on to make the username unique).

Umm opps...  sorry...






Hexagon, Carrara, Sculptris, and recently Sketchup. 



mmoir posted Mon, 26 December 2011 at 5:35 PM

Antaran,

 Like your model so far. Here are my comments.

 

Quote - 3. Do I need to UV map this and how do I do this right?

Right now if I go into the UV map view, the thing looks scary. And I have no idea how to make any sense of it.

 You don't have to UV Map it as it looks okay now, maybe add another "Basic Layer" on top of the handle in the Texture Room with an opacity of 50% or something . Layered shaders can add depth to your textures.

  Here is a quick way to UV Map something in the VM room with multiple meshes.

1.Shift + Select one "Edge" from each of you separate polymeshes in the vm room.

2.Dynamically extrude these edges , doesn't matter how much.

3.Ctrl+shift+w  and weld all the selected points together. You should be left with a single vertex.

4.Delete this Vertex.

 What we did here is connect all of our polymeshes into 1 polymesh but they are still separate polymeshes for selection purposes.

5.Now double click the entire polymesh ,click the UV icon in the VM room and choose Operations/Box/6 sided mapping.

Your whole object should be mapped although you could scale the UV's if you want.

 

  1. What about scale? Right now this thing is huge. Where do I scale (assembly room? modeling room?) it and how do I do it correctly for best usability?

 It is probably best to scale it in the Modeller but I generally scale things in the assembly room as it is quicker. If you like to have your models scale consistent with other models in the scene then use the correct scale in the modeler. 

  1. This is a single vertex object with multiple sub-objects and shading domains. Is this the right way to do it or should I be separating all the internal objects into assembly-room objects and grouping them in the assembly room?

This is how I model most things in the Vertex Modeller.

I am also using Carrara's smoothing. Is that a good thing to do or a bad practice? The model does look a bit different when smoothing is disabled. For example, the glass does not match the frame when smoothing is changed.

You can smooth both the Glass and the frame which sometimes makes things fit together better.

I'd like for someone here who is better experienced at modeling to take a look at the model itself and tell me what I can improve about it. Hence the question of how and where to upload it.


thomllama posted Mon, 26 December 2011 at 8:36 PM

Attached Link: Stamped Fire box

OK, next part.. been working on the fireplace more this eve,... trying to produce the stamped/formed firebox (look at the image supplied) only thing I haven't gotten is the decorative border on the last layer f the arches that trans to the flat face...  anyone got ideas?

 

 

the model is at the link above.. (you may have to select "download" by holding the Command or control key when clicking on the link here to actually download it.






Hexagon, Carrara, Sculptris, and recently Sketchup. 



Antaran posted Tue, 27 December 2011 at 4:38 PM

Quote - Antaran,  Like your model so far. Here are my comments.

Thank you! All your comments are extremely helpful. Most are straight forward, but the shading/UV-related stuff I still have some questions about:

Quote - You don't have to UV Map it as it looks okay now, maybe add another "Basic Layer" on top of the handle in the Texture Room with an opacity of 50% or something . Layered shaders can add depth to your textures.

Could you tell me more about the layered shaders, please? Right now I am confused. Are you talking about a multi-channel mixer shader where one of the multi-channels is replaced with a basic layer (for color?) Or am I totally misunderstanding the concept?

Quote -   Here is a quick way to UV Map something in the VM room with multiple meshes.1.Shift + Select one "Edge" from each of you separate polymeshes in the vm room.

2.Dynamically extrude these edges , doesn't matter how much.

3.Ctrl+shift+w  and weld all the selected points together. You should be left with a single vertex.

4.Delete this Vertex.

 What we did here is connect all of our polymeshes into 1 polymesh but they are still separate polymeshes for selection purposes.

5.Now double click the entire polymesh ,click the UV icon in the VM room and choose Operations/Box/6 sided mapping.

Your whole object should be mapped although you could scale the UV's if you want.

  This is a very neat method of uniting the mesh parts for UV mapping. I'll definitely adopt it. It din't work very well for this particular model though. I UV-mapped the 3 main parts which might require complex shading. (It's the UV1 version on the server)

I wouldn't be able to tell people how I did it though... I just kept messing with it until my UV shader starrted to look somewhat right. Still not perfect.


mmoir posted Tue, 27 December 2011 at 6:01 PM

Antaran,

  Here is a screen shot of a Layer list shader. I started out with a Multichannel shader , then for step 1. I clicked the "+" at the bottom of the shader tree then chose Basic layer and edit this layer the way I want then change the opacity of this layer so the bottom layer shows through.  See the screencapture.  Hope this helps.


mmoir posted Tue, 27 December 2011 at 8:13 PM

Okay , here is my Violin and Bow. No uvmapped textures although the main body has been mapped but just regular shaders. I will upload the Carrara file shortly.

 

Here is the link to get the .car file.

http://www.mediafire.com/?nxlv7wsxhppua0x

 


Antaran posted Wed, 28 December 2011 at 10:48 PM

Quote - Antaran,   Here is a screen shot of a Layer list shader. I started out with a Multichannel shader , then for step 1. I clicked the "+" at the bottom of the shader tree then chose Basic layer and edit this layer the way I want then change the opacity of this layer so the bottom layer shows through.  See the screencapture.  Hope this helps.

Thank you so much! I've never used this feature before and I've been missing out. It adds so many new possibilities and easy alteration options. It's one of those great things which, once you discover them, make you wonder how you've lived all this time without them.

I used to struggle with realistic looking polished wood, and turns out all I had to do was add this feature and use a glass shader at 50% opacity over any regular wood shader. Add brown color to the glass and you instantly get a realistic veneer finish. So beautifully simple. And you can swap out different wood shaders without needing to change all the relevant properties to get the necessary finish!

Seriously, I can't thank you enough for showing this to me. I think it's so far the strongest contestant for  my "Best Carrara Discovery of the Year" for 2011.

 

And I like your violin. There are some interesting polygons. I wonder how they came about. Also I'd be very curious to know how would something like this get full UV mapping?


Xerxes0002 posted Tue, 31 January 2012 at 8:28 PM

Nice.. sorry I didn't see this way back.. I hope something like this pops up again.


thomllama posted Tue, 31 January 2012 at 8:43 PM

Quote - Nice.. sorry I didn't see this way back.. I hope something like this pops up again.

Join in.  Still a LOT of stufftoo be modeled.  Just choose something and post up what ya want to do then go model it. :)






Hexagon, Carrara, Sculptris, and recently Sketchup. 



diomede posted Thu, 02 February 2012 at 12:10 AM

Just saw the thread and would like to jump in. Looking at the reference image I guess I'll try a clock for the mantelpiece. 


SirCamillo posted Mon, 06 February 2012 at 1:52 AM

Is this thread still alive? I'm new here, mostly been on DAZ forum. I'd like to join in. Camillo

Animation can explain whatever the mind of man can conceive.

Walt Disney


thomllama posted Mon, 06 February 2012 at 6:09 AM

Yup. Though everyone seems busy ( including myself). But still going.  Choose an item and have some fun






Hexagon, Carrara, Sculptris, and recently Sketchup. 



SirCamillo posted Mon, 06 February 2012 at 7:32 AM

Great, 

I'll make a chair and table.

Camillo

Animation can explain whatever the mind of man can conceive.

Walt Disney


Xerxes0002 posted Mon, 06 February 2012 at 2:52 PM

Cool I will be choosing something soon.. Life keeps rearing its ugly head


SirCamillo posted Tue, 07 February 2012 at 12:29 AM

Hi Everyone,

Here's My Chair and Table.  I added a book just because I could.

Spent a better part of the day.  Should be working, but well....

 

Where and How are we up loading, and will it be Carrara format?

 

Camillo

Animation can explain whatever the mind of man can conceive.

Walt Disney


MarkBremmer posted Sat, 11 February 2012 at 10:28 AM

Really nice to see what's being produced here!






thomllama posted Sat, 11 February 2012 at 10:35 AM

Quote - Really nice to see what's being produced here!

 

yaa.. there is.. why don't you jump in Mark  :thumbupboth:






Hexagon, Carrara, Sculptris, and recently Sketchup. 



thomllama posted Sat, 11 February 2012 at 10:38 AM

Hey, Sir Camillo,  get my message on uploading?  I'll set you up on my server or maybe we can get Mark to set soething up here?  ;)

 






Hexagon, Carrara, Sculptris, and recently Sketchup. 



MarkBremmer posted Sat, 11 February 2012 at 2:53 PM

Yes, I need to actually do some 3D work for fun for a change - just doing it for work isn't quite the same. Let me  see what I can contribute. 

There is a way for me to put content in the 'back room' for download but there isn't an upload system to do it independently. I'd have to receive the files from you and then put them on the server here. Just let me know if you'd like that to happen. 






thomllama posted Mon, 13 February 2012 at 11:26 AM

OK, finished the Fireplace... the shaders could use a little work.. *(got to figure out that method posted up by Mmoir)*

Can be downloaded here ---  Fireplace in Cherrywood

 






Hexagon, Carrara, Sculptris, and recently Sketchup. 



Kixum posted Tue, 14 February 2012 at 6:25 AM

Mark,

I think it would be cool to setup an area of the back room but we could also just upload models to free stuff.

 

I thought we were talking about that earlier.

-Kix


MarkBremmer posted Tue, 14 February 2012 at 6:43 AM

Yea, let me check that out. 'Rosity has a procedure to follow for Free stuff, so I'll see if they would mind us simply putting some things in the Back Room without going through the "proper" steps. 






thomllama posted Tue, 21 February 2012 at 4:18 PM

Anyone else?  

 

Hey Sir camillo? you still around? would like to download the models we have so far and maybe do a render..?






Hexagon, Carrara, Sculptris, and recently Sketchup. 



MarkBremmer posted Tue, 21 February 2012 at 4:41 PM

The powers that be said, "OK" to to a download area in the backroom. I'll put it together. 






DarwinsMishap posted Fri, 30 March 2012 at 12:36 PM

Hm..Feb 21st this year is the last note on this.  Is this still going on?  I'd like to try my hand at a few knick knacks or something if so.  I'm busy as all heck myself, but I've been squeaking out a little time here and there to work on a few projects.

If this is still going on, I'll go through some photos and see what else of interest (and something I may be able to make) is there to do.


thomllama posted Fri, 30 March 2012 at 1:21 PM

ya.. haven't totally given up yet... been busy (as have everyone else I'm guessing) but no rush so go t otown.. choose something and model away.  

 

Hey Mark, what we gotz to do to the get download area up?






Hexagon, Carrara, Sculptris, and recently Sketchup. 



Antaran posted Fri, 20 July 2012 at 6:09 PM

OK, It's been a very long time, but I came back to this when my film project was done, and now I am here to report some results and frustration, and to ask for help.

So, I was going to model a pipe. And I did, but it's not nearly as nice as I intended it to be, and I keep thinking that I am actually doing it wrong.

I started in the spline modeler with a circle section and created a path that looked roughly like a pipe in profile. Then I converted the horrid shape that was thus created into the vertex modeler, removed extra (triangular and coplanar) edges and fiddled with the shape by hand to beat it into something actually resembling a pipe. With some heavy smoothing it now kinda sorta does...

But there must be a better way to do this, because what I did is in no way a good modeling technique. I kept trying to find a way to use a path in the vertex modeler to get some extrusion along it, but again, I must have been doing it wrong because that just didn't want to happen. I got some really funny shapes with the lathe tool, but that's no surprise, since that tool was never intended for the curved objects like the pipe.

So, is there a better way of doing this? and where are we uploading the objects for others to look at and use?

Thank you for your patience and help.


thomllama posted Fri, 20 July 2012 at 6:18 PM

only thing I could think of off hand is to use the excrusion in the vortex modeller?  some of the more knewledgeable people might have a better idea






Hexagon, Carrara, Sculptris, and recently Sketchup.