Forum: Poser - OFFICIAL


Subject: Pantyhose, stockings....?

DarkElegance opened this issue on Nov 08, 2014 · 7 posts


DarkElegance posted Sat, 08 November 2014 at 9:11 PM

Ok I was wishing for a shader/material setting that will give stockings...the sheen and look of stockings. I know there is a shader to apply to the legs of V4 that gives them the look of having stockings/pantyhose on...but is there a shader out there for cloth? That gives the highly transparent sheen of nylon?

https://www.darkelegance.co.uk/



Commission Closed till 2025



EClark1894 posted Sat, 08 November 2014 at 11:10 PM

 You could try BB's stocking shaders. I believe they can be applied to any figure, so I don't see why a cloth object wouldn't work just as well.




bagginsbill posted Sun, 09 November 2014 at 7:49 AM

http://www.renderosity.com/mod/forumpro/?thread_id=2803439


Renderosity forum reply notifications are wonky. If I read a follow-up in a thread, but I don't myself reply, then notifications no longer happen AT ALL on that thread. So if I seem to be ignoring a question, that's why. (Updated September 23, 2019)


pumeco posted Sun, 09 November 2014 at 8:02 AM

Sorry to hear that, baggins, the design mess is one thing but deleting the work you put in here is something else.
I hope whetever it is makes make you think it's deleted, turns out to be just a fixable cock-up!


DarkElegance posted Sun, 09 November 2014 at 2:02 PM

http://www.renderosity.com/mod/forumpro/?thread_id=2803439  Oh brilliant! thank you BB. I really wish I had your brains.

https://www.darkelegance.co.uk/



Commission Closed till 2025



DarkElegance posted Sun, 09 November 2014 at 2:02 PM

Sorry to hear that, baggins, the design mess is one thing but deleting the work you put in here is something else.
I hope whetever it is makes make you think it's deleted, turns out to be just a fixable cock-up!
Did  miss something? o.0

https://www.darkelegance.co.uk/



Commission Closed till 2025



pumeco posted Sun, 09 November 2014 at 2:15 PM

Sorry, DarkElegance, please ignore it, I was replying to Baggins but he's edited his post :-)