. . . that addresses poser content development.  Various forum posts discussed why, formally, Poser vendors now develop content only for DAZ Studio. Clearly these vendors have the technical abilities to develop content for both DAZ and Poser. Not being a vendor, I have little insight into this issue-and may well exhibit my ignorance here (go figure?). But I’ve long wondered whether the vendors’ migration from poser to DAZ was financial. If so, what subsidiary would cause former Poser venders to once again develop content in both the DAZ and Poser format?  

 My knowledge of Renderosity’s business model varies from none to non-existent. Instead, I’m contemplating a private-sector LLC that subsidiarizes venders who develop poser content. So, my questions is this: how much would a vendor who developed a DAZ studio content expect to also create poser content?