mf193 opened this issue on Jun 20, 2001 ยท 7 posts
mf193 posted Wed, 20 June 2001 at 12:08 PM
ClintH posted Wed, 20 June 2001 at 1:34 PM
Nice image. Just curious what type of processor it took so long to render on. Sounds like a Bryce render time to me. ;) God Bryce is soo slow. Clint
Clint Hawkins
MarketPlace Manager/Copyright Agent
All my life I've been over the top ... I don't know what I'm doing
... All I know is I don't wana stop!
(Zakk Wylde (2007))
mf193 posted Wed, 20 June 2001 at 2:30 PM
The render didnt take 2 hrs, just playing with settings to get it to look right did. I have an 1 ghz athlon, so im set in terms of render power, it only took 1:02 to render. Thanx anyway guys...and no, bryce is crap, i wouldnt render anything there.
DigitalDream#3 posted Wed, 20 June 2001 at 5:21 PM
Blobs need to be opaque with a wax like texture. Looks nice otherwise.
AzChip posted Wed, 20 June 2001 at 5:42 PM
I agree -- cool pic, and the lava should be opaque.... I had a lava lamp when they were in vogue the first time, and have one again.... (mine's got more or less clear liquid with kind of pinkish lava.) Man, I miss the '70's.
mf193 posted Wed, 20 June 2001 at 10:20 PM
i was really unsure since i just bought one, and it looks almost a clear red (my pic is a decent likeness) so i didnt know, but if u guys think thats cool ill give that a shot
twillis posted Thu, 21 June 2001 at 7:31 AM
The lava in my lamp is opaque, also.