brittmccary opened this issue on Jan 18, 2002 ยท 8 posts
brittmccary posted Fri, 18 January 2002 at 10:19 PM
Kiera posted Sat, 19 January 2002 at 2:39 AM
I would suggest Kozburo's hair, the wavy kind. I have made it VERY long it and still looked great. There are some red textures floating around for it, somewhere. You might want to consider bending her elbow a tad for the seated pose. Other than that, it looks great so far. Based on the portraits I have seen, she had a rather bumpy nose. Sort of a regal British bump, if you catch my drift. =D
dolly posted Sat, 19 January 2002 at 3:00 AM
Coming along nicely why not leave out the hair as she was as bald as a coot any way lol,good job cheers dolly
thip posted Sat, 19 January 2002 at 3:51 AM
I'm on expert on QE1, but I think she would've gathered her hair in some top-knot or other bunched-up style, rather than just letting it hang down. Several hair styles are available for that. The only way I've had any bit of luck w/ cloaks is by making them snake-posable, i.e. grouping them length-wise into a number of segments, and then combining this with morphs to make the cloak "curl around" the figure. And that face is getting really intriguing - brings back fond memories of the "Elizabeth" movie. Once you've done QE1, her lover (I forget his name), Walsingham, Norfolk, and even the french queen/princess would be fabulous characters, too. Damn - sorry, I'm getting carried away ;-)
brittmccary posted Sat, 19 January 2002 at 7:00 AM
kieraw, - that hair might work. I'll have to look into the that, - lol and dolly she wasn't bald when she was young. Not sure what age she was when she lost the hair. but she did have loose hair for the coronation, thip. That's why I'm looking for it. Hmm... snake-posable. I guess I'll have to take a look at a snake then. thip, I assume you still would use the body part names?? thip.. yes... there were a bunch of interesting characters... her parents would be a couple of them, wouldn't they?? kieraw.. lol I know about that bump on the nose, - but this looked cuter! g Britt
shadowcat posted Sat, 19 January 2002 at 11:14 AM
brittmccary posted Sat, 19 January 2002 at 11:36 AM
Definately, Shadowcat. That looks like it! Thank you! I'll test it out! :) Britt
thip posted Sat, 19 January 2002 at 5:40 PM
Britt - nope, I don't use the body part names. A cloak, after all, moves with "a will of its own", it seldom clings to the wearer (except when wet). It usually looks better when posed independently, as a poseable prop parented to the figure's top chest or neck.