Legume opened this issue on Feb 06, 2002 ยท 21 posts
Legume posted Wed, 06 February 2002 at 10:45 AM
Penguinisto posted Wed, 06 February 2002 at 10:46 AM
I like it... and to be honest, a little less detail makes for a greater message. /P
SAMS3D posted Wed, 06 February 2002 at 10:49 AM
This is really good, love simplicity. Sharen
Jazzmin posted Wed, 06 February 2002 at 11:04 AM
Wow! Great posing, excellent point... I like it too!
Vive Bene. Spesso
L'Amore. Di Risata Molto.
Live Well. Love Often. Laugh Much.
thgeisel posted Wed, 06 February 2002 at 11:34 AM
woodies in love !!!Nice one!!
ScottA posted Wed, 06 February 2002 at 11:53 AM
Ouch! They'll get splinters! ;-)
pokeydots posted Wed, 06 February 2002 at 11:53 AM
Legume, Nice work! Simple is better :)
Poser 9 SR3 and 8 sr3
=================
Processor Type: AMD Phenom II 830 Quad-Core
2.80GHz, 4000MHz System Bus, 2MB L2 Cache + 6MB Shared L3 Cache
Hard Drive Size: 1TB
Processor - Clock Speed: 2.8 GHz
Operating System: Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit
Graphics Type: ATI Radeon HD 4200
•ATI Radeon HD 4200 integrated graphics
System Ram: 8GB
jaydiva posted Wed, 06 February 2002 at 12:25 PM
I like it alot, simple yet great !!
Mehndi posted Wed, 06 February 2002 at 2:21 PM
Attached Link: http://www.kreative.net/hbg/resume/gallery_menu.html
dlfurman posted Wed, 06 February 2002 at 2:36 PM
A word that should be taken out of the dictionary or where the defintion should be changed to "different CULTURES" not different RACES. After 10 years of work, scientists have discovered that if you are HUMAN, the only difference between you and any one of the other six billion PEOPLE on the the planet is 0.1%. (Or we are all 99.9% the SAME) Of course there are some of us who did not need the Human Genome Project to clue us in. It is also very interesting in the Biblical account of creation after all the LOWER life forms and plants were commanded to reproduce according to KIND, that command was NOT placed on Adam and Eve. Cool pic!
"Few are agreeable in conversation, because each thinks more of what he intends to say than that of what others are saying, and listens no more when he himself has a chance to speak." - Francois de la Rochefoucauld
Intel Core i7 920, 24GB RAM, GeForce GTX 1050 4GB video, 6TB HDD
space
Poser 12: Inches (Poser(PC) user since 1 and the floppies/manual to prove it!)
Mehndi posted Wed, 06 February 2002 at 2:40 PM
It is a rascist word invented during rascist times when it was against the law to commit miscengenation, and interacial couples could not even legally marry. Strangely enough, the word still exists in the laws in many states.
VirtualSite posted Wed, 06 February 2002 at 3:29 PM
We have several very stupid words in laws across this nation. For example, can anyone tell me what the legal definition of "sodomy" is? In some states, its simply having sex with someone youre not married to. In others, its something akin to beastiality. In others, it refers to a very specific sexual act under very specific circumstances. But no matter where you look, its always different.
Penguinisto posted Wed, 06 February 2002 at 4:20 PM
Not sure, VS - however, the military's Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) also has a prohibition against sodomy, which basically boils down to "no oral or anal sex" even if you're married to the one you're doing it with. 'course, no one ever paid attention to it, and rarely was anyone prosecuted for it (those folks that did get court-marshalled for it were almost always gay/lesbian.) /P
namja1955 posted Wed, 06 February 2002 at 5:04 PM
I suppose that on the brighter side of things we should consider the fact that most people don't know what the word means as a sign of some small progress.
Legume posted Wed, 06 February 2002 at 5:22 PM
"I suppose that on the brighter side of things we should consider the fact that most people don't know what the word means as a sign of some small progress." But on the darker side of things, we should consider the fact that most people don't know the meanings of LOTS of five-syllable words as a sign of the failure of our public education system. ;)
Cin- posted Wed, 06 February 2002 at 5:24 PM
In an article about the failure of public education in a local newspaper, while I was still IN a public high school, public was misspelled as pubic.
namja1955 posted Wed, 06 February 2002 at 5:38 PM
Not too long ago the New York Daily News had a profile on NYC's teacher of the year. They showed a picture of the gentleman standing at the blackboard,(I suppose I should be politically correct and say chalkboard but that'a another issue). According to the text of the article the teacher had just finished writing an assignment on the board and the students started to snicker. It seems that he had made a spelling error. Naturally the News published the photo.
Legume posted Wed, 06 February 2002 at 6:26 PM
What does the image "Miscegenation" depict? It's a very simple image, obviously, and the literal answer is "two Poser mannequins intertwined". But how do you perceive it? What do you see?
namja1955 posted Wed, 06 February 2002 at 6:45 PM
Well the first thing I notice is that there is no pink in the photo.
Penguinisto posted Wed, 06 February 2002 at 7:18 PM
pink ...what? Everyone pink on the inside anyhoo. /P
Little_Dragon posted Wed, 06 February 2002 at 8:21 PM
But how do you perceive it? What do you see?
Darth Vader and a Stormtrooper sharing a moment of forbidden pleasure.
(Forgive me. I've had Star Wars on my mind lately.)