Badco opened this issue on Mar 19, 2002 ยท 11 posts
Badco posted Tue, 19 March 2002 at 7:24 PM
Last night an animation I posted of clothing being naughty was deleted for violation of tos. Now the animation showing the results of those naughty little clothing was not deleted. I guess the pregnant clothing was not against tos. I mean, we are talking about clothing here ! I did not think that the animation was against any rules and I just have no idea why it would be deleted. Does anyone have any thoughts as to why it would have been deleted ?
MissTara posted Tue, 19 March 2002 at 7:35 PM
I'm drawing a blank there, too. I guess some people just get offended easily. Or maybe some people think OTHER people might get offended too easily by it. I saw the animation in question and although I had no problem with it, I guess I can see where some people would. Especially those parental units who let their kids on the internet unsupervised. Might I point those people to Net Nanny or something? :)
PabloS posted Tue, 19 March 2002 at 7:38 PM
I haven't read the tos for awhile, but I recall a "sexual activity" restriction. I guess it doesn't matter what the objects are.
Tomsde posted Tue, 19 March 2002 at 7:45 PM
You might be able to post it at Renderotica, which I have found to be a very nice website which doesn't restrict artistic vision. Though some things I have seen there I have found to be disturbing, but I'd perfer that to censorship. Although I understand why Renderosity wants to keep such stuff off of here, what's obsene is highly subjective. Perhaps a better solution would be an adult verification system here that would only allow adults to see images with sexual content.
Legume posted Tue, 19 March 2002 at 9:39 PM
I'm sorry, BadCo, but I must agree with the admins on this. What I didn't see was FILTHY, and should have been removed to make sure that nobody else doesn't see what I didn't see either. My God, man, what if someone's CHILD didn't see that?
Huolong posted Tue, 19 March 2002 at 10:05 PM
Legume, Are you intimating an unequivical insinuation here?
Gordon
Legume posted Tue, 19 March 2002 at 10:11 PM
To be honest, I've seen more risque stuff on Comedy Central.
MissTara posted Tue, 19 March 2002 at 10:27 PM
LOL@Legume It takes someone with a dirty mind to see things that aren't there. :)
Legume posted Tue, 19 March 2002 at 10:29 PM
Not so dirty that I'd delete it ;)
neurocyber posted Tue, 19 March 2002 at 10:50 PM
Did anyone miss not seeing what it was that I didn't see? Hehehe... (Ok I just had to say that) :)
ScottA posted Tue, 19 March 2002 at 11:49 PM
Re-posting an item that a moderator has deleted is not allowed. The link has been removed from here. And if the situation warrants it. An Admin. will be contacting you personally. ScottA