jschoen opened this issue on Feb 05, 2000 ยท 6 posts
jschoen posted Sat, 05 February 2000 at 9:19 PM
Sprout posted Sat, 05 February 2000 at 10:21 PM
That is simply AWESOME!! just the way it is and where I live we can never get enough of them :O) Sprout
Freakachu posted Sun, 06 February 2000 at 1:20 AM
jschoen--simple solution to your morph problem--double click on the morph dial. Set the values on the dial for a minimum value of 0.000, the maximum value for 1.000 and the sensitivity to 1.000. That way, the umbrella only has two states, open or closed. Morphs work well for things that open up, down, or sideways, but if the morph requires part of the object moves in an arch (like opening a hinged lid or a book) the in-between states look bizarre.
picnic posted Sun, 06 February 2000 at 1:30 AM
One more thing I think I want. Please post--altho' the morph to open or close would be nice if you can work it out. Diane B
jschoen posted Sun, 06 February 2000 at 1:36 AM
Thanls for the tip Freak, but i indeed wanted to have it open. Might just be a little to much for a morph. I'll more than likely just post it as a static prop. Oh well here's an update.
James My she's been standing there for a long time. heheh
Anthony Appleyard posted Sun, 06 February 2000 at 8:26 AM
jschoen wrote: but I kept getting garbage on the inbetween morph - You will. As a morph target scaling parameter dial is moved, the affected vertexes always move in straight lines. You would need a Poser model with each hinged or sliding part as a separate jointed part, and then wait until someone has put into Poser an ability for two parts which share vertexes but they are not parent and child, not to split apart in movement.