Mosca opened this issue on May 14, 2002 ยท 18 posts
Mosca posted Tue, 14 May 2002 at 10:25 AM
Attached Link: http://www.renderosity.com/viewed.ez?galleryid=183762&Start=1&Sectionid=0&Form.Search=Mosca
For whatever reason, they haven't pulled this one (yet). Same figure, just as naked. Go figure.Kendra posted Tue, 14 May 2002 at 10:47 AM
I love it.
...... Kendra
milamber42 posted Tue, 14 May 2002 at 11:15 AM
LOL. Can this image make it to #1 in the Hot 20?
Turtle posted Tue, 14 May 2002 at 12:03 PM
I just voted for it. :O). I had already put a comment last night.
Love is Grandchildren.
Peej posted Tue, 14 May 2002 at 12:17 PM
Nice image, but the one with the flyswatter really kicked butt. I'd like to see more fairy pics with flyswatters. Many many more.
queri posted Tue, 14 May 2002 at 12:58 PM
I don't know, Mosca, all my furries fart more on Science Diet. I just voted for it.:))))))))) Emily
Mosca posted Tue, 14 May 2002 at 1:18 PM
Lordy. So I just got an email from one of the managers (nameless, for now), warning me that I'm on the verge of a 7 day suspension. I've asked his permission to post that particular email here (somehow I doubt that's gonna happen); suffice it to say, it was a little abrupt. No skateboarding in the mall, kids!
chohole posted Tue, 14 May 2002 at 1:28 PM
I put my vote in, even if I am repressed and hysterical.
The greatest part of wisdom is learning to develop the ineffable genius of extracting the "neither here nor there" out of any situation...."
bkaras posted Tue, 14 May 2002 at 1:28 PM
Sheesh. Mosca, This situation is going from absurd to surreal....
Hiram posted Tue, 14 May 2002 at 1:29 PM
Sounds like some folks are taking this thing (and themselves)way too seriously. A bad call on the part of an authority figure will inevitably be satirized. It's the "little people's" best way of giving them perspective.
bigdog1 posted Tue, 14 May 2002 at 3:58 PM
I like your attitude!
Mosca posted Tue, 14 May 2002 at 4:02 PM
Surreal is where I live, bkaras. And thanks to all who've voted the image into the Hot 20. What's with all those Indian pics, anyway?
KattMan posted Tue, 14 May 2002 at 4:40 PM
What's with all those indian pics? Who knows but eventually they may be banned also for promoting the fall of the Indian Nation. Let me go back to my previous statement: Forget telling us what we can't post in the TOS, tell us what we can. It will be a much easier list to manage. Let me start with what I think covers it all. You are only allowed to post things in this list: Naked Vicky with sword in a temple. Landscapes without animals (can't have anyone claiming a hunt is involved) Fractal art. Any image not falling into one of these catagories will result in immediate removal and a seven day ban on the artist. I could live with this if it were inforced. I'd just go somewhere else knowing that rosity has the right to limit what they want. We just want the TOS enforced and images deleted for going against the current TOS, not something that might be there in the future.
queri posted Tue, 14 May 2002 at 5:21 PM
Hey! There's good Fractal art. Mine, for instance! On the other hand, landscapes without animals is lame. Emily
ethertwist posted Tue, 14 May 2002 at 6:39 PM
Here I go again, laughing my a** off :D Thanks for making my day. BTW, has anyone noticed most of the lips in the Hot20 seem unnaturally swollen? Is that the collagen morph?
KattMan posted Tue, 14 May 2002 at 9:06 PM
oops sorry, guess I will have to remove fractals from there also. It could be considered promoting drug use, most notably acid.
EricofSD posted Tue, 14 May 2002 at 11:28 PM
Attached Link: http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=US&navby=case&vol=000&invol=00-795
Here's the link to the new case. It was decided April 16, 2002 and calls for a rewrite of the code to exclude digital virtual images. I'm not happy that some might abuse the daylights out of this, but I am delighted that the issue of real life abuse is distinguished from virtual images that are artistic.ronknights posted Wed, 15 May 2002 at 6:51 AM
Hey folks, in some ways Renderosity is far more liberal than other sites. I have a series of renders entitled "Tenderness." I was ordered to remove them from another site. I was informed that they showed "sexual intent." There was absolutely no indication of sexual activity. The couple had their underwear on.. They weren't even touching "intimate body parts." The series remains at Renderosity. I know you're upset about fairies being banned (I find that quite shocking myself). It's also important to keep some focus here. Renderosity is not a site over-run by rabid censors. Renderosity is more liberal than other sites. Ron