Erlik opened this issue on May 14, 2002 ยท 8 posts
Erlik posted Tue, 14 May 2002 at 1:20 PM
What's wrong?
-- erlik
draculaz posted Tue, 14 May 2002 at 1:23 PM
take it out and do it in post
Erlik posted Tue, 14 May 2002 at 1:30 PM
Um, no. It's the May challenge picture.
-- erlik
AgentSmith posted Tue, 14 May 2002 at 6:12 PM
I suggest not using the volumetric world settings, ever, lol. Maybe it's just the pictures I have done, but I have never noticed a difference when using that option and it makes the render take forever...
Contact Me | Gallery |
Freestuff | IMDB
Credits | Personal
Site
"I want to be what I was
when I wanted to be what I am now"
Aldaron posted Tue, 14 May 2002 at 6:49 PM
What AgentSmith said, don't use the world settings.
Stephen Ray posted Tue, 14 May 2002 at 9:39 PM
Volumetric world setting is basically for a light environment. To make all light in the scene visible. Like sunbeams coming through the clouds. Looking at the little piece of your scene, I don't see where you need it. It also adds ages to the render time. You also can't have atmosphere turned off when you use it.
Erlik posted Wed, 15 May 2002 at 1:06 AM
I used the volumetric world to simulate distance in this case, which it did pretty well. I'll have to up haze instead, right? And yes, it multiplied the rendering time by ... twenty, I guess, if not even thirty.
-- erlik
Rayraz posted Sat, 18 May 2002 at 9:46 AM
Haze is a faster way. I hope Corel fixes the problem with those edges, it always keeps me from using multiple volumetric environments/objects in the same world-place (since verson 3).
(_/)
(='.'=)
(")(")This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your
signature to help him gain world domination.