TheVelvetFoxx opened this issue on Nov 07, 2002 ยท 12 posts
TheVelvetFoxx posted Thu, 07 November 2002 at 7:55 AM
dpoosch posted Thu, 07 November 2002 at 9:57 AM
I have found that by using a program found on Fred Miranda's site (mainly photography) called "Stair Interpolation" I get excellent results in printing photos and artwork I do. The progran was free last time I checked. It is a photoshop action so you will of course need photoshop to run it.
TheVelvetFoxx posted Thu, 07 November 2002 at 1:22 PM
I have PS7. I'll try this. Thanks!
Slynky posted Thu, 07 November 2002 at 1:30 PM
if the image is actually THAT size, no interpolator in the world is gonna give you a nice picture man, sorry to say.
dpoosch posted Thu, 07 November 2002 at 1:39 PM
True....no program is going to give you more than what you have in the original image. But photoshop can improve how the data appears. A small image in reasonably good shape can look ok with the stair interpolation....much better than what photoshop can do by itself.
TheVelvetFoxx posted Thu, 07 November 2002 at 1:43 PM
This is the thumbnail. The actual image was a 3"x5".
TheVelvetFoxx posted Thu, 07 November 2002 at 1:44 PM
...which I only want to blow up to an 11" x 14". I blew it up to 8" x 10". That is when the pixelation occurred. I should mention that this only happens on the printed image. The digital image looks great on my screen!
Hoofdcommissaris posted Fri, 08 November 2002 at 4:06 AM
A digital image looking great on screen is one of the main problems I encounter almost daily. People want me to use their digital photographs in print. The issue is that to make a good print you need 300 dpi. Screen resolution is 72 dpi. For a 11"x14" print, the screen size should be 44"x56". Although modern fotoprinters seem to produce rather good images on lower resolutions. There is a lot more information in the Photoshop manual (that large book that came with the cd). There is other software that claims it can enlarge up to 300% with no loss of quality. But I can't remember the name. I have been trying for half an hour now.
TheVelvetFoxx posted Fri, 08 November 2002 at 7:33 AM
Hmmm...I'll go back and look it up in my manual again. I must have missed something. I admit to scanning the text and not always reading it thoroughly. ;) I did read through the help section which was hopefully confusing. The nasty printer lady did tell me that if I got this problem licked I'd be in good shape. I've changed the resolution on my digital camera for this reason. Thanks all for the terrific suggestions. I'll give'em a whirl.
retrocity posted Fri, 08 November 2002 at 9:33 AM
Actually you'll want to get as much information regarding "resolution" "DPI/PPI" "scanning for printing output" and other related topics because they are critical to getting the best output from your work. Trying to keep the information straight is another matter ;)
:)
retrocity
BTW, soon there will be a new "backroom" here in the forum, with many tutorials and tip sheets...
joe555 posted Mon, 11 November 2002 at 9:55 PM
I use genuine fractals. it works great
TheVelvetFoxx posted Wed, 13 November 2002 at 9:02 AM
Fractals...now that's an idea!