I'm uncertain to why this is, or what it is about my image titles/thumbnails that doesn't seem to be inviting to viewers. Maybe people are put off by my own comments at previous postings, as they don't get my kind of humor? And no you don't even have to pull up my whole images, since I'm not out to artificially inflate my viewings (but if you want to, that's fine.) You could look at the thumbs at my gallery and see the counts and let me know what it is about them that isn't all too inviting. I guess the little bits of bigger pictures doesn't work for me, as it does with other artists... Anyhow, it appears that my technically simple images seem to be much more popular than the ones which I consider more involved from the production side. Perhaps it is something to do with their conceptual nature. I could understand higher counts for the ones which I refer to for commentary, etc. as I post here. But some others seem like they should be sufficient for some interest in themselves and get skipped. Now mind you that I'm not the qualitive genius like hobbit, jmslee, pidjy, or some with names sounding like electronic age dutch masters. They all impress the hell out of me. But then again, I usually don't go into a project more than a couple hours (and 90% of the time that's including the rendering.) I'm lacking the kind of patience it would take to work on something for a month like they do. And no, I'll try not to resort to posting naked poser ladies just to boost my image counts. (Not that there's anything wrong with naked poser ladies, mind you.) I would hope that I'm a bit more creative than resorting to that. Just wondering what that special something is...

---

Barbequed Pixels?

Your friendly neighborhood Wings3D nut.
Also feel free to browse my freebies at ShareCG.
There might be something worth downloading.