You need something made of polygons? I've got your polygons right here pal! No, seriously! Don't run away! Just show me the drawings and I'll model it. Really. You want it for free? No, it'll still cost. I only do freebies on my own accord, and request jobs aren't up for grabs like that. Still here?
Need advice or direction? IÂ can consult too. I can also teach the basics of Catmull Clarke, provided you don't mind using Wings3D. It's the tool that has the essentials without getting fancy, like having copy paper and #2 pencils for drawing, but in the 3DÂ software sense. Perhaps it doesn't purvey the excitement of the more expensive tools of the trade, however if you want a solid foundation and understanding of the art - it does the job.
Oh yeah, I also do drawings/illustrations/animation/photography/photo manipulation/etc. I'm not just 3D, I'm a bit more multifaceted than that. No, I'm not talking about polygons in that case. But you know what IÂ mean. Look at my gallery, all kinds of stuff. Probably not the most inspired stuff at the moment, but nothing's really pushing my buttons much at the moment. I almost feel that my muse went on an unpaid vacation, so it's hard to do some things without the compulsion there. The right incentive might bring that back into working order.
BIO
A somewhat decent artist who hasn't figured out how to make it big yet. Email or something if you think you know where next big break is that might fit my niche. I could use the help.
Comments (2)
RETIRED
cool. I wonder if the cannard needs to be further forward so that the air flow from cannard to main wing is more seperated and defined. perhaps you could check out some of the cannard wing designss that have been designed and flown ...
pauljs75
I think it'll be ok. 1. It's not real. 2. Canard is below the wing plane a bit. 3. Forward swept wings do different and interesting things with pressure boundary than delta or backswept wings. 4. Russians are doing something similar with the Su-47 fighter prototype and it seems to work.