Contre ou por la Victoire by mickeyrony
Close
Hover over top left image to zoom.
Click anywhere to exit.
Members remain the original copyright holder in all their materials here at Renderosity. Use of any of their material inconsistent with the terms and conditions set forth is prohibited and is considered an infringement of the copyrights of the respective holders unless specially stated otherwise.
Description
Splendid of the Victoire porcelain milky white with ornament gold but the title of the part::Contre rules or for the Victoire ??Thank you with any Artists for their comments eulogistic and comforting..........................((Magnifiques statues de la Victoire en porcelaine blanc laiteux avec ornement or :Le titre de la pièce ::Contre ou pour la Victoire?? Merci à tout Artistes pour leurs commentaires élogieux et réconfortant
Comments (16)
MagikUnicorn
Superbe Photo Excellent choix por le titre ;-)
pewe67
Wonderful artwork, fantastic photo!!
Mondwin
Très superbè et magnifique image...bravissimo!V:DDD.Ciao
TwoPynts
These are lovely objects you have scanned, but as scans, please put them in the Mixed Medium gallery in the future, not the photography gallery. Thanks.
dalma
Pour ou contre la victoire??? je crois que tout dépand de quelle victoire, je pense qu'il faut croire et vouloir cette victoire, après......j'aime cette idée ;) Les statuts sont très belles!!!!!
Skydancer917
Very unique!
Skyback
Remarkable shot! 5+!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
awadissk
Excellent!!!!!!!!!
Denys234
Awesome!
VelvetMoxie
Hmmmm...I have to wonder what TwoPynts' theory is here. Though many of us are into digital photography, the last I heard film photography was not only considered "real" photography, but if you listen to the purists, the ONLY real photography. That being said, I know of no way to get those photos onto the net without scanning them. If scanning makes an image "mixed media" then just what, pray tell are we to consider a digital photo that has been enhanced, sharpened or otherwise adjusted with Photoshop? Many professional photographers (albeit the purists) will tell you it is in fact the scanned image that is "REAL"; not the digital one. As for me, I think this is an excellent shot which has picked up the opalescent finish on the bottle in a wonderful way. I would much more seriously consider a helpful critique citing suggestions for apurture, photographic technique or filters than one that criticizes the means by which we transfer the image to the net. (And yes, I do a wee bit of photographic work myself, LOL!) Keep 'em coming, Mickey!
LudyMelltSekher
{@}~>---Hello my dear friend, A wonderful Photography full of harmony and beauty. Fantastic work. Superbly done!! Congratulations!! It is a real luxury to visit your gallery. A million stars and applauses from me.** (Thanks you very much for the nice comments,they are very estimated for my) That this Friday be a beautiful day for youHug and kiss in Your heart. Luminous blesing. Ludy@>--->---
cmcc
nice texture study.
drifterlee
Very nice!!
brycek
Beautiful..excellent shot!!
Desiderius
Toutes plus surprenantes les unes que les autres ces pièces de collections!! Si je peux me permettre une petite suggestion, il serait bien (pour ceux que ça intéresse) de citer la date de fabrication et l'origine de l'objet (quand ces détails sont connus bien sûr) ainsi que la petite histoire qui lui est liée (car tous les objets ont une histoire. A moins que ce ne soit encore une devinette, mais là, je suis surpris de ne rien deviner sur cet objet)
Darkwish
Nice, really nice!