Okay, so I spent Super Bowl Sunday on my weekend science (fiction) project and not watching the game. Shows how much of an ubergeek I am, I guess. Well, so far only two people expressed an interest in an annotated view, but I couldn't help myself. In any case, at least I know someone is interested, and two other people did add me as a favorite artist after that last image, even if it only has 29 views so far. So I have an excuse. Here is the Archimedes in various different views, including a partially decomposed annotated main image. All rendered in Bryce. All the text and annotations was put together in Visio (hey, I gotta work with the tools I have) and it should print as a nice 11X17 image. (I have to *ahem* test those printers at work to see if it looks okay) For those who want to try to print it, I put a zip (2MB) of the Visio (created in 2007, but 2003 should work) at : http://www.geir.org/transfer/Archimedes.zip I think this is a feasible, no "super tech" design, but any and all rocket science errors are my own. I only made it through the first two years of Engineering-Physics and that was over twenty years ago. Half of what I've learned about rocket science since comes from Wikipedia. I explained the design a bit in my previous image posting. All I can say about the feasibility (assuming no math errors) is that the mass is probably too low. And if you have to add more payload mass, then you'll have to add more power and radiator mass, and for every chunk of non-fuel mass, you have to add another two chunks of fuel mass. So pretty soon the three hundred ton ship becomes six hundred tons, and the people in the home district start making jokes about how much the "probe to Uranus" is costing and then the politicians start looking to pull the plug. So to speak. Anyway, the story is the image on this one. Not expecting a whole lot of views, but for those of you who take a gander, thanks for viewing, and your comments are always welcome.