the Orb (stereo set) by zescanner
Open full image in new tab Members remain the original copyright holder in all their materials here at Renderosity. Use of any of their material inconsistent with the terms and conditions set forth is prohibited and is considered an infringement of the copyrights of the respective holders unless specially stated otherwise.
Description
A somewhat surreal image: as a woman wades in
the water she comes across "the Orb"
I think I have this set up so that you can use the two images on the left in the "crossed-eye" technique and the two on the right in the "parallel-viewing" technique.
Comments (11)
Incarnadine
well i got it to work, cool!
WyldeSnake
Cool way to post an image. But how did you do the 3d effect? I would like help on how to position the camera, etc.
the3dgm
Works for me! Nicely done.
gerry_g
Woah!! instant flash back to all those 'Magic Eye Books' I ruined my eyesight on some years back, very nice, and it works ;-)
zescanner
WyldeSnake, I positioned the camera twice to make two separate renders: one for the left eye and one for the right eye viewpoint. And in fact, for this image, I positioned the camera immediately in front of each eye of the poser figure so that it would hopefully look like what she was seeing.
CAMBOU
I love stereo picts and do love this one. The reflexions on the ball are outstanding. May I suggest you should sign on each image so that your signature would come clearly on the stereo image.
smiles95
That is wicked cool 3d! Tell me how to do that!
mjhatch
Hey I only just found this one, top work. Maybe we'll see some more stereo in the future?...;)
graphicguru
Personally, I like to cross my eyes all day, I find it relaxing. Hey Jeff, I will be doing some more stereo-scopic stuff soon as well. (I really like yours). VOTE! P.S. to answer snake, just render one version of the image first. Then move the camera to one side (not too far) and render it again. Be sure not to change the image lighting or ANYTHING, nor the angle or altitude of the camera, (just move it over a little to one side). (WOW this was posted a while ago!)
zescanner
Yeah, this was posted awhile back. When I did this image I was not able to get a handle on the cross-eyed viewing. I have since learned how to do it at will. And... when I come back to this image I play around with the two kinds of veiwing and try to figure out how they differ. Here are my observations: in cross-eyed viewing the other stuff on the screen outside of the image (menus etc.) seems to be more distracting, but the image itself seems more stable. In parallel viewing the image "seems" larger altho it isn't. But really strange - the image "moves" with my heartbeat. As for total comfort in viewing... I think it is just a matter of which you are most practiced with. I used to be far more comfortable with parallel but I am getting a lot better with the cross-eyed. One other difference: with free-viewing (no lens assistance) parallel viewing the images MUST be no farther apart than the distance between your eyes and that limits the size of the art. With cross-eyed viewing they can be bigger. Scan the galleries and you will see that this is so.
Naoo
Amazing! Excellent! Nice... It works :-)