This is posted in response to comments made in the forums concerning the Supreme Courts decsion over CG child porn. First, child porn is wrong in all forms. To be more specific, what I view child porn is images with children in sexual positions or in sexual acts. The intent of the orginal law was to protect children AND to stop this sick behavior. The part of the Child Pornography Prevention Act that was struck down was too vague and poorly written. I hope that Ashcroft will be able to get some lawmakers together to write a balenced law that will stop perverts and protect free speech. So, Little Victoria will not be used that way. Note: The image was originaly going to be used to show the ugly side of little kid beauty pagents. But, I felt this was more important. Please don't give me crap about her chest. I am trying to make a point about how children are used improperly. Also, those chest morphs that I made will never be available for download. That's one Pandora's box that I will not open.