Sun, Oct 6, 4:03 AM CDT

Hoodoo

Vue Landscape posted on Aug 14, 2008
Open full image in new tab Zoom on image
Close

Hover over top left image to zoom.
Click anywhere to exit.


Members remain the original copyright holder in all their materials here at Renderosity. Use of any of their material inconsistent with the terms and conditions set forth is prohibited and is considered an infringement of the copyrights of the respective holders unless specially stated otherwise.

Description


No art here..just piles of rocks. Something I've discovered working with displacement. Proximity to the camera affects both render time and stability. It's bizarre. What was taking 47 hours to render a quarter of the way before it crashed, takes just a few minutes when you move the camera back. Also, the polycount goes up and down like crazy. 'Dynamic' displacement? Go figure.

Comments (17)


)

gerberc

7:29AM | Thu, 14 August 2008

Cool rocks! Thanks for the hint of moving the camera. My Vue allways crashes when I try to render structures using displacement that take a large portion of the image. Far away or small portions of the image works fine.

)

Trepz

8:24AM | Thu, 14 August 2008

Apparently Vue handles it's displacement like it does its procedural terrains...Interesting to know though(;

)

brylaz

8:36AM | Thu, 14 August 2008

Excellent render!!!

)

wabe

10:35AM | Thu, 14 August 2008

Very stony. And something to report as bug. Sounds like one definitely. Oh yes, an excellent image as well!

)

Schnuck

10:54AM | Thu, 14 August 2008

Very beautiful work!!!

)

Xpleet

12:50PM | Thu, 14 August 2008

of how many rocks is the background rock composed? ;) also, I don't quite get what you mean by camera movement?!?! How can little cam movement change the rendertime so drastically? Also, is this "displace outwards only"?

)

Monsoon

1:04PM | Thu, 14 August 2008

The background rock is composed of two objects and the foreground is three objects. Camera movement....the displacement is evidently being calculated by Vue the same way dynamic subdivision is. The closer to the camera, the more polygons. It's only done that since the last build. Never had a problem before. I use both positive and negative displacement.

)

chippwalters

3:06PM | Thu, 14 August 2008

Hmmm. Nice find on the dynamic displacement issue. Cool. Really nice image :-)

)

jp3319

3:17PM | Thu, 14 August 2008

Very cool, and great scene!

)

rds

10:03PM | Thu, 14 August 2008

Well done. Vue6 still needs much work. Excellent scene.

)

FrenchKiss

12:55AM | Fri, 15 August 2008

Very interesting experiment and conclusions. I don't think Vue had displacement before version 6, though, but I'm not sure. Your rocks rock, btw!

)

Thelby

2:20AM | Fri, 15 August 2008

Yeah, but it looks So Cool, Very Nice Work Mark!!!!

)

prutzworks

3:42AM | Fri, 15 August 2008

love it

)

meselfr

6:23AM | Fri, 15 August 2008

fantastic :)

)

Trouble

5:59PM | Fri, 15 August 2008

Your rocks rock Mark! That displacement bug should be reported though

)

madmaxh

1:54AM | Mon, 01 September 2008

Killer rock work and thanks for the heads-up on the displacement quirk.

)

blankfrancine

4:05AM | Tue, 21 October 2008

an awesome image!


0 164 0

00
Days
:
19
Hrs
:
56
Mins
:
39
Secs
Premier Release Product
Hot Secrets - Poses for G9F-G8F-G3F
3D Figure Assets
Top-Selling Vendor Sale Item
$14.90 USD 40% Off
$8.94 USD

Privacy Notice

This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.