The Box 2.0 by DirtyFairy
Close
Hover over top left image to zoom.
Click anywhere to exit.
Members remain the original copyright holder in all their materials here at Renderosity. Use of any of their material inconsistent with the terms and conditions set forth is prohibited and is considered an infringement of the copyrights of the respective holders unless specially stated otherwise.
Description
okay so i reworked it a little....let me know how it looks! i highlighted her backside a bit more, and tried to center the lights on the left more on her, less reflection in the eyes....
Comments (11)
alessimarco
In my opinion, just as excellent as the first...with a different artistic emphasis. I like both!!
Primal
This looks Excellent..
Forevernyt
Yep, I like it. Lighting looks good.
Lenord
Looks good, maybe a bit too much ambient light but hell I aint no Spert. I'd overlay the 2 in Photoshop and do a 50/50 blend/normal then run a High Key Glow Action on it but that's me, a photoshopping fool. I think they both look good Lissa Peace
cv1
Awesome mood and very pretty render!
J5ive
It looks Great!! But I Think i like the Other!!
Tracesl
wonderful setting and scene, great looking character
thecytron
Fantastic rendering work!
Seaview123
Outstanding job on this picture!
dayna2
Pandora pandora dont open the box, dont open the box, shakes head..............
Ivory-Ivory
I've never critiqued an image on this site before, so pardon any "cultural ignorance." That said, I am generally pretty critical of the nature of the computer imaging...clothing doesn't mold or flow quite right, necklaces float around necks, feet don't actually seem to touch the ground, teeth often seem to glow and light shines up nostrils. THIS image the EYES are better. HOWEVER, they would be better on the first version. The first version is, in my opinion, much better lit. This one the girl is too bright. Amost like a spotlight is on her. It's just much too much light for only three candles, which granted, may not be the only light source in the room. On both of them, the shadowning of where the hands touch the body is a little off. I can't tell you what exactly, but it's like the hand is not creating shadow on the body. It's more pronounced on Box 1 because of the more subdued lighting. The shadowning of the sole of the right foot also seems too light. And Box 1 half the big toe is shaved off. BUT, Box 1 the character looks like she is actually kneeling on the ground, not cut and pasted in. Had you not asked for critiques, I wouldn't have even noticed most of the above on Box 1. It is clearly a superior image, not to just Box 2, but to most of the 3-D computer images on the site. It is EXCELLENT work. (PS: Sorry if this seems like a rant. I am not known for short e-mails at work either.)