Sat, Oct 5, 2:39 PM CDT

General Atomics Lunar Shuttle

Bryce Science Fiction posted on Feb 26, 2011
Open full image in new tab Zoom on image
Close

Hover over top left image to zoom.
Click anywhere to exit.


Members remain the original copyright holder in all their materials here at Renderosity. Use of any of their material inconsistent with the terms and conditions set forth is prohibited and is considered an infringement of the copyrights of the respective holders unless specially stated otherwise.

Description


General Atomics Orbit-to-Orbit Lunar Shuttle System Part four of my Project Orion Series, previous installments at the links below. Part One: Project Orion: A Design Overview. Part Two: Right Before Part Three: Project Orion Historical Context Chart Lunar operations support vehicle designs include options for an earth-orbit-to-lunar-orbit re-usable nuclear propulsion system with a separate re-usable chemical-descent/ascent-stage cargo-Lander vehicle in both manned and unmanned versions. In protracted Lunar base support operations Cargo Landing vehicles would be transported one-way to a manned lunar base where they would serve on a serial basis, individually tanked for launch to lunar orbit for additional cargo retrieval missions. Surface to orbit vehicles carry only fuel for a single ascent or descent – arriving orbit-to-orbit cargo shuttles would need to carry a descent fuel load to be transferred to the Cargo-Lander in an orbital tanking operation. The system incorporates the basic nuclear 10-m (33 Ft) diameter propulsion module, includes a propulsion magazine section, cargo modules, a two-deck shielded command module with adaptor connections for up to two passenger modules. A base-line of three crew members was assumed for operation of the Orbit-to-Orbit Cargo Shuttle with a two man operational crew required for Cargo-Lander operations. The Command module is intended to separate from the cargo load and fly on station-keeping orbit with the propulsion module during cargo-transfer and tanking operations. The Command module is equipped with an independent orbital maneuvering hydrazine-fueled propulsion system Passenger modules can accommodate up to twenty passengers, and are serviced by independent life-support systems but carry no independent propulsion or maneuvering systems. A separate Passenger-Shuttle was designed to accommodate up to twenty passengers and two crew members within a single large cabin fed by an open-cycle life support system. The passenger Shuttle is equipped with a surface-excursion ladder while Cargo-Landers would require a roll-up gantry for crew egress and module systems access and maintenance. Credits: Diagram figure 3.8 and figure 3.9 from GA-5009, Vol. 1; Nuclear Pulse Space Vehicle Study. Note: It is only rarely that I elect use a model or model-element from an on-line source in these vehicle reproductions – and in that rare case it is because the model (or element) represents the best or most accurate resource – as in the case of the NASA EVA suits – NASA is the best source of this item. In this case I’ve chosen to use this G.V.C.S (Generic Vehicle Construction Set) module (with slight flattening and re-scaling) for the piloted command module element of the General Atomics landing craft – all other modeling is my own. Note: Update 3/1/2011 Due to a slight scaling error. As always, thank you all for your thoughtful comments, interest, and encouragement.

Comments (10)


)

TallPockets

12:36PM | Sat, 26 February 2011

EXCELLENT work, wblack! (PEACE & SALUTE!)

)

geirla

1:43PM | Sat, 26 February 2011

Very nicely modeled!

nobletrilogy

2:54PM | Sat, 26 February 2011

Im against nuclear propulsion Surface to orbit vehicles. just wanted to say that..

)

wblack

5:34PM | Sat, 26 February 2011

I am pleased that you have finally commented on an image (nobletrilogy has been favoriting my images for the past month -- and I do thank him for that). Contextually I find it odd that you make this particular comment on a system designed for launch on the Saturn V or up-rated Saturn 1C -- both are chemical launch vehicles, not nuclear. There are no nuclear powered atmospheric launched elements pictured here. So – your contextual choice is odd, nonetheless I will indulge your off-topic commentary. In principal opposition to nuclear launch vehicles is misplaced: one might as well be opposed to medical x-rays and nuclear power plants. There is nothing we do as a technological society that does not involve the possibility of risk – conversely there is a 100% certainty of zero benefit from abstinence in technological pursuit.

)

peedy

12:14AM | Sun, 27 February 2011

Fantastic modeling, as usual. :-) Corrie

)

Hubert

3:37AM | Sun, 27 February 2011

Awesome model and great presentation!!

)

flavia49

6:55AM | Sun, 27 February 2011

fantastic!!

)

wotan

4:30PM | Sun, 27 February 2011

Great work!

)

duo

6:42PM | Mon, 28 February 2011

Wonderful and realistic design! I like it!

WPL2

2:47PM | Wed, 02 March 2011

Again, amazing work.


0 324 0

00
Days
:
09
Hrs
:
20
Mins
:
56
Secs
Premier Release Product
Rock Formation
3D Models
Top-Selling Vendor Sale Item
$12.00 USD 40% Off
$7.20 USD

Privacy Notice

This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.